Dissociation and psychotic symptoms in a non-psychotic inpatient sample, a latent profile analysis

Stefan Tschoeke , Lukas Stürner , Erich Flammer , Leonhard Kratzer , Benjamin Grieb , Susanne Jaeger
{"title":"Dissociation and psychotic symptoms in a non-psychotic inpatient sample, a latent profile analysis","authors":"Stefan Tschoeke ,&nbsp;Lukas Stürner ,&nbsp;Erich Flammer ,&nbsp;Leonhard Kratzer ,&nbsp;Benjamin Grieb ,&nbsp;Susanne Jaeger","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2025.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Considering the clinical relevance of the association between dissociation and psychotic symptoms for the differential diagnosis of psychotic symptoms, we investigated the distribution and type of dissociative and psychotic symptoms in inpatients with non-psychotic disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Basic procedures</h3><div>We used routine data from 1020 patients to conduct latent profile analyses using the German version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale and items from the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, which captures psychotic symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>Exploratory factor analysis revealed two qualitatively distinct factors of psychotic symptoms, one comprising paranoid ideation and the other perceptual and self-disturbances. Subsequent latent profile analysis revealed a three profile solution of dissociative and psychotic symptoms. One profile was characterized by almost no paranoid ideation and no perceptual and self-disturbances, one profile was characterized by almost exclusively paranoid ideation and the last profile was characterized by up to the most severe perceptual and self-disturbances combined with paranoid ideation. The first profile showed no pathological dissociation, in the second profile mainly absorption and derealization/depersonalization in particular were elevated, while the last profile was associated with severe dissociation on all subscales.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>The results indicate a close relationship between dissociation and psychotic symptoms in non-psychotic disorders. While paranoid ideation appears to be associated with moderate dissociation, perceptual and self-disturbances are almost exclusively present in the profile with the strongest dissociation. Therefore, dissociation should be considered in the differential diagnosis of psychotic symptoms, and psychotic symptoms in non-psychotic disorders may benefit from approaches that address dissociation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598725000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Considering the clinical relevance of the association between dissociation and psychotic symptoms for the differential diagnosis of psychotic symptoms, we investigated the distribution and type of dissociative and psychotic symptoms in inpatients with non-psychotic disorders.

Basic procedures

We used routine data from 1020 patients to conduct latent profile analyses using the German version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale and items from the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, which captures psychotic symptoms.

Main findings

Exploratory factor analysis revealed two qualitatively distinct factors of psychotic symptoms, one comprising paranoid ideation and the other perceptual and self-disturbances. Subsequent latent profile analysis revealed a three profile solution of dissociative and psychotic symptoms. One profile was characterized by almost no paranoid ideation and no perceptual and self-disturbances, one profile was characterized by almost exclusively paranoid ideation and the last profile was characterized by up to the most severe perceptual and self-disturbances combined with paranoid ideation. The first profile showed no pathological dissociation, in the second profile mainly absorption and derealization/depersonalization in particular were elevated, while the last profile was associated with severe dissociation on all subscales.

Principal conclusions

The results indicate a close relationship between dissociation and psychotic symptoms in non-psychotic disorders. While paranoid ideation appears to be associated with moderate dissociation, perceptual and self-disturbances are almost exclusively present in the profile with the strongest dissociation. Therefore, dissociation should be considered in the differential diagnosis of psychotic symptoms, and psychotic symptoms in non-psychotic disorders may benefit from approaches that address dissociation.
一个非精神病住院病人样本的分离和精神病症状,一个潜在的特征分析
目的考虑到精神分离和精神病症状之间的相关性对精神病症状的鉴别诊断的临床意义,我们调查了非精神病性障碍住院患者中精神分离和精神病症状的分布和类型。我们使用来自1020名患者的常规数据,使用德文版本的解离体验量表和症状检查表-90-修订版中的项目进行潜在特征分析,该量表捕获精神病症状。主要发现探索性因素分析揭示了两种定性不同的精神病症状因素,一种包括偏执观念,另一种包括知觉和自我障碍。随后的潜在侧写分析揭示了解离和精神病症状的三侧写解决方案。一份档案的特征是几乎没有妄想妄想也没有知觉和自我干扰,一份档案的特征是几乎完全有妄想妄想最后一份档案的特征是最严重的知觉和自我干扰并伴有妄想妄想。第一种特征没有表现出病理性的分离,第二种特征主要表现为吸收和现实感丧失/人格解体,而最后一种特征在所有子量表上都与严重的分离相关。结论:非精神障碍患者的精神分裂与精神症状有密切关系。虽然偏执观念似乎与中度分离有关,但知觉和自我障碍几乎只存在于最强烈分离的侧面。因此,在精神病症状的鉴别诊断中应考虑解离,非精神病性障碍的精神病症状可能受益于解离的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信