Academic achievement of undergraduate health students: Effect of learning styles and personal-familial factors

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Meltem Koç , Ayşen Canan Pakeloğlu , Banu Bayar , Kılıçhan Bayar
{"title":"Academic achievement of undergraduate health students: Effect of learning styles and personal-familial factors","authors":"Meltem Koç ,&nbsp;Ayşen Canan Pakeloğlu ,&nbsp;Banu Bayar ,&nbsp;Kılıçhan Bayar","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between academic achievement and learning styles, personal characteristics (e.g., age, gender), and family characteristics (e.g., family structure, income) among undergraduate health sciences students. The study included 735 undergraduate students from four health sciences departments—Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Dietetics, Health Management, and Nursing—each with a four-year curriculum. Learning styles were assessed using the Index of Learning Styles, while academic performance was measured by Grade Point Averages (GPA) ranging from 1.00 to 4.00. Students with a GPA below 3.00 were categorised as low achievers (n = 499), and those with a GPA of 3.00 or higher as high achievers (n = 236). The Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test compared numerical data, and the chi-squared test analysed categorical variables. Significant differences in daily leisure time, daily study time, gender, department, high school graduation type, and accommodation were observed between low and high achievers (p &lt; 0.05). However, age did not significantly differ between groups (p &gt; 0.05). Among family factors, no significant differences were found in family structure, family income, or paternal education level (p &gt; 0.05), but maternal education level showed a significant difference (χ<sup>2</sup> = 27.371, p &lt; 0.001). Visual/verbal learning styles differed significantly between groups (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.024, p = 0.03), while no significant differences were found for active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, or sequential/global learning styles. The study highlights the significant impact of personal and family characteristics on the academic success of health sciences students, emphasizing the crucial role of learning styles in academic achievement. These findings can inform strategies to enhance academic performance in health sciences education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925003548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between academic achievement and learning styles, personal characteristics (e.g., age, gender), and family characteristics (e.g., family structure, income) among undergraduate health sciences students. The study included 735 undergraduate students from four health sciences departments—Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Dietetics, Health Management, and Nursing—each with a four-year curriculum. Learning styles were assessed using the Index of Learning Styles, while academic performance was measured by Grade Point Averages (GPA) ranging from 1.00 to 4.00. Students with a GPA below 3.00 were categorised as low achievers (n = 499), and those with a GPA of 3.00 or higher as high achievers (n = 236). The Mann-Whitney U test compared numerical data, and the chi-squared test analysed categorical variables. Significant differences in daily leisure time, daily study time, gender, department, high school graduation type, and accommodation were observed between low and high achievers (p < 0.05). However, age did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Among family factors, no significant differences were found in family structure, family income, or paternal education level (p > 0.05), but maternal education level showed a significant difference (χ2 = 27.371, p < 0.001). Visual/verbal learning styles differed significantly between groups (χ2 = 7.024, p = 0.03), while no significant differences were found for active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, or sequential/global learning styles. The study highlights the significant impact of personal and family characteristics on the academic success of health sciences students, emphasizing the crucial role of learning styles in academic achievement. These findings can inform strategies to enhance academic performance in health sciences education.
本科卫生系学生学业成绩:学习方式与个人家庭因素的影响
摘要本研究旨在探讨健康科学本科学生学业成绩与学习风格、个人特征(如年龄、性别)和家庭特征(如家庭结构、收入)的关系。这项研究包括来自四个健康科学系的735名本科生——物理治疗与康复、营养与饮食学、健康管理和护理——每个系都有四年的课程。学习风格是用学习风格指数来评估的,而学习成绩是用平均绩点(GPA)来衡量的,平均分在1.00到4.00之间。平均绩点低于3.00的学生被归类为低成就学生(n = 499),平均绩点在3.00以上的学生被归类为高成就学生(n = 236)。Mann-Whitney U检验比较数值数据,卡方检验分析分类变量。在日常休闲时间、日常学习时间、性别、系、高中毕业类型和住宿方面,低、高成就生之间存在显著差异(p <;0.05)。然而,年龄在两组间无显著差异(p >;0.05)。在家庭因素中,家庭结构、家庭收入、父亲受教育程度无显著差异(p >;0.05),但产妇受教育程度差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 27.371, p <;0.001)。视觉/语言学习风格在组间差异显著(χ2 = 7.024, p = 0.03),而主动/反思、感知/直觉或顺序/全局学习风格无显著差异。该研究强调了个人和家庭特征对健康科学学生学业成功的显著影响,强调了学习方式在学业成就中的关键作用。这些发现可以为提高健康科学教育的学习成绩的策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信