Associations Between Contraceptive Counseling Quality and Contraceptive Use in a National Survey of Women Veterans.

Samantha K Benson, Siobhan Mahorter, Xinhua Zhao, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, Sonya Borrero, Lisa S Callegari
{"title":"Associations Between Contraceptive Counseling Quality and Contraceptive Use in a National Survey of Women Veterans.","authors":"Samantha K Benson, Siobhan Mahorter, Xinhua Zhao, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, Sonya Borrero, Lisa S Callegari","doi":"10.1177/15409996251360153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Contraceptive counseling quality is associated with trust in providers, method satisfaction, and method continuation. Little is known, however, about associations between counseling quality and method choice, particularly for methods requiring a high level of involvement of providers to initiate and stop the method. <b><i>Objective(s):</i></b> Investigate associations between experiences of high- or low-quality counseling and contraceptive method type. <b><i>Research Design:</i></b> We analyzed data from a national survey of women veterans ages 18-44 receiving care at the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Among participants who received contraceptive services at VA in the past year (<i>n</i> = 358), counseling quality was assessed with six Likert-scale items capturing key elements of patient-centered care. We explored two independent counseling quality variables: (1) high-quality (strongly agree on all items) versus all other responses and (2) low-quality (neutral/disagree/strongly disagree on ≥4 items) versus all other responses. Contraceptive methods were categorized based on the level of provider involvement required for initiation and discontinuation: long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) procedures, prescription methods, and those that require no provider involvement. We examined associations between quality and method type used using logistic regression models, controlling for potential confounding covariates. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Veterans reporting high-quality counseling were more likely (aOR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.48), and those reporting low-quality counseling were less likely (aOR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.90), to have undergone LARC placement. Veterans reporting low-quality counseling were more likely to have used a method that required no provider involvement (aOR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.26, 5.83). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> High-quality contraceptive counseling is associated with use of LARC methods, while low-quality counseling is associated with use of contraceptives that require no provider involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251360153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contraceptive counseling quality is associated with trust in providers, method satisfaction, and method continuation. Little is known, however, about associations between counseling quality and method choice, particularly for methods requiring a high level of involvement of providers to initiate and stop the method. Objective(s): Investigate associations between experiences of high- or low-quality counseling and contraceptive method type. Research Design: We analyzed data from a national survey of women veterans ages 18-44 receiving care at the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Among participants who received contraceptive services at VA in the past year (n = 358), counseling quality was assessed with six Likert-scale items capturing key elements of patient-centered care. We explored two independent counseling quality variables: (1) high-quality (strongly agree on all items) versus all other responses and (2) low-quality (neutral/disagree/strongly disagree on ≥4 items) versus all other responses. Contraceptive methods were categorized based on the level of provider involvement required for initiation and discontinuation: long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) procedures, prescription methods, and those that require no provider involvement. We examined associations between quality and method type used using logistic regression models, controlling for potential confounding covariates. Results: Veterans reporting high-quality counseling were more likely (aOR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.48), and those reporting low-quality counseling were less likely (aOR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.90), to have undergone LARC placement. Veterans reporting low-quality counseling were more likely to have used a method that required no provider involvement (aOR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.26, 5.83). Conclusions: High-quality contraceptive counseling is associated with use of LARC methods, while low-quality counseling is associated with use of contraceptives that require no provider involvement.

在一项全国女性退伍军人调查中,避孕咨询质量与避孕使用之间的关系。
背景:避孕咨询的质量与对提供者的信任、方法满意度和方法的延续有关。然而,人们对咨询质量和方法选择之间的关系知之甚少,特别是对于需要提供者高度参与来启动和停止方法的方法。目的:调查高质量或低质量咨询经验与避孕方法类型之间的关系。研究设计:我们分析了在退伍军人健康管理局(VA)接受护理的18-44岁女性退伍军人的全国调查数据。在过去一年在VA接受避孕服务的参与者中(n = 358),咨询质量通过六个李克特量表项目进行评估,这些项目捕获了以患者为中心的护理的关键要素。我们探索了两个独立的咨询质量变量:(1)高质量(在所有项目上都非常同意)与所有其他回答相比;(2)低质量(在≥4个项目上中立/不同意/非常不同意)与所有其他回答相比。根据开始和停止所需提供者参与的程度对避孕方法进行分类:长效可逆避孕(LARC)程序、处方方法和不需要提供者参与的方法。我们使用逻辑回归模型检查了质量和方法类型之间的关联,控制了潜在的混杂协变量。结果:退伍军人报告高质量咨询的可能性更大(aOR: 1.95;95% CI: 1.09, 3.48),报告低质量咨询的可能性较小(aOR: 0.12;95% CI: 0.02, 0.90)。报告低质量咨询的退伍军人更有可能使用不需要提供者参与的方法(aOR: 2.71;95% ci: 1.26, 5.83)。结论:高质量的避孕咨询与LARC方法的使用有关,而低质量的咨询与不需要提供者参与的避孕措施的使用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信