Appropriate Timing and Interval for Surveillance Colonoscopy after Liver Transplantation Based on a Single-Centre Experience.

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Canadian liver journal Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.3138/canlivj-2024-0041
Dae Gon Ryu, Hongqun Liu, Samuel S Lee, Ki Tae Yoon, Mayur Brahmania
{"title":"Appropriate Timing and Interval for Surveillance Colonoscopy after Liver Transplantation Based on a Single-Centre Experience.","authors":"Dae Gon Ryu, Hongqun Liu, Samuel S Lee, Ki Tae Yoon, Mayur Brahmania","doi":"10.3138/canlivj-2024-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colon cancer surveillance post liver transplantation (LT) is generally recommended. This study aimed to determine the appropriate timing for the first colonoscopy after LT and the interval for subsequent surveillance colonoscopies based on our single-centre real-world experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients who underwent LT at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital between December 2008 and March 2024 were reviewed. Patients who underwent colonoscopy at least once after LT were analyzed. After the first post-transplant colonoscopy, subsequent colonoscopies were divided into an intensive and a nonintensive surveillance group based on a 3-year interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 404 LT recipients with 1,076 colonoscopies were analyzed. The analysis included pre-transplant (n = 219), first post-transplant (n = 404), and subsequent colonoscopies (n = 453). Cecal intubation failure and poor bowel preparation were higher in the pre-transplant colonoscopy than the post-transplant colonoscopy (3.2% versus 0.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.010; 13.2% versus 4.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Although high-risk polyps were resected in 17 recipients (7.8%) through pre-transplant colonoscopy, they were also discovered in 17 recipients (4.2%) at the first post-transplant colonoscopy. There were no differences in malignancy or high-risk polyp detection between recipients who underwent intensive surveillance (median interval, 22 months) after the first post-transplant colonoscopy and those who did not (median interval, 52 months; 0.6% versus 2.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.381 and 3.7% versus 2.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.598).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colonoscopy prior to LT may be insufficient; therefore, the first colonoscopy after LT should be performed within 1 year. Subsequent colonoscopies should follow the general surveillance interval.</p>","PeriodicalId":510884,"journal":{"name":"Canadian liver journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian liver journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2024-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colon cancer surveillance post liver transplantation (LT) is generally recommended. This study aimed to determine the appropriate timing for the first colonoscopy after LT and the interval for subsequent surveillance colonoscopies based on our single-centre real-world experience.

Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent LT at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital between December 2008 and March 2024 were reviewed. Patients who underwent colonoscopy at least once after LT were analyzed. After the first post-transplant colonoscopy, subsequent colonoscopies were divided into an intensive and a nonintensive surveillance group based on a 3-year interval.

Results: A total of 404 LT recipients with 1,076 colonoscopies were analyzed. The analysis included pre-transplant (n = 219), first post-transplant (n = 404), and subsequent colonoscopies (n = 453). Cecal intubation failure and poor bowel preparation were higher in the pre-transplant colonoscopy than the post-transplant colonoscopy (3.2% versus 0.8%, p = 0.010; 13.2% versus 4.4%, p < 0.001). Although high-risk polyps were resected in 17 recipients (7.8%) through pre-transplant colonoscopy, they were also discovered in 17 recipients (4.2%) at the first post-transplant colonoscopy. There were no differences in malignancy or high-risk polyp detection between recipients who underwent intensive surveillance (median interval, 22 months) after the first post-transplant colonoscopy and those who did not (median interval, 52 months; 0.6% versus 2.1%, p = 0.381 and 3.7% versus 2.1%, p = 0.598).

Conclusions: Colonoscopy prior to LT may be insufficient; therefore, the first colonoscopy after LT should be performed within 1 year. Subsequent colonoscopies should follow the general surveillance interval.

基于单中心经验的肝移植术后监测结肠镜检查的适当时机和间隔。
背景:肝移植(LT)后结肠癌监测是普遍推荐的。本研究旨在根据我们的单中心真实世界经验,确定LT后第一次结肠镜检查的合适时机和随后结肠镜检查的间隔时间。方法:回顾性分析2008年12月至2024年3月在釜山大学梁山医院行肝移植的患者病历。对肝移植后至少进行一次结肠镜检查的患者进行分析。在第一次移植后结肠镜检查后,根据3年的间隔将后续结肠镜检查分为强化和非强化监测组。结果:共分析404例肝移植受者和1076例结肠镜检查。分析包括移植前(n = 219)、首次移植后(n = 404)和随后的结肠镜检查(n = 453)。移植前结肠镜检查中盲肠插管失败和肠道准备不良的发生率高于移植后结肠镜检查(3.2%对0.8%,p = 0.010;13.2% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001)。尽管17例(7.8%)移植前结肠镜切除了高危息肉,但17例(4.2%)移植后第一次结肠镜检查也发现了高危息肉。在第一次移植后结肠镜检查后接受强化监测(中位间隔,22个月)和未接受强化监测(中位间隔,52个月;0.6%对2.1%,p = 0.381; 3.7%对2.1%,p = 0.598)。结论:肝移植前结肠镜检查可能不够;因此,肝移植术后第一次结肠镜检查应在1年内进行。后续结肠镜检查应遵循一般监测间隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信