Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with mitral annular calcification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8
Abiodun Idowu, Olayinka Adebolu, Bakhtawer Siraj, Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul, Omotola Balogun, Kevin Bryan Lo, Christian Witzke, Emmanuel Akintoye, Behnam Bozorgnia, Gregg Pressman
{"title":"Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with mitral annular calcification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abiodun Idowu, Olayinka Adebolu, Bakhtawer Siraj, Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul, Omotola Balogun, Kevin Bryan Lo, Christian Witzke, Emmanuel Akintoye, Behnam Bozorgnia, Gregg Pressman","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is common in patients with functional mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER). However, the safety and effectiveness of TEER systems in patients with MAC is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed multiple online databases to identify studies that reported outcomes in patients undergoing TEER with underlying moderate/severe MAC versus those with no/mild MAC. Random-effect model meta-analysis at a 95 % confidence interval was done via Cochrane Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 studies with a pooled 2808 patients (no/mild MAC: 84.5 % vs moderate/severe MAC: 15.5 %) were included. Compared to those with no/mild MAC, patients undergoing TEER with moderate/severe MAC have an insignificant trend towards a lower immediate procedural success (OR: 0.62, 95 % CI: 0.37 - 1.04, p = 0.07). After one year of TEER, the two groups had similar rates of repeat mitral valve intervention or surgery (OR: 1.67, 95 %CI: 0.92 - 3.05, p = 0.09), sustained clinical improvement (NYHA ≤ 2) (OR: 0.86, 95 %CI: 0.64 - 1.15, p = 0.30), and heart failure re-admission (OR: 0.84, 95 %CI: 0.52 - 1.36, p = 0.48). All-cause mortality was, however, higher in the moderate/severe MAC patients (OR: 1.82, 95 %CI: 1.15 - 2.86, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEER appears safe and effective in carefully selected patients with significant MAC. A standardized selection algorithm is needed to identify MAC patients that would benefit most from TEER.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.07.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is common in patients with functional mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER). However, the safety and effectiveness of TEER systems in patients with MAC is poorly understood.

Methods: We systematically reviewed multiple online databases to identify studies that reported outcomes in patients undergoing TEER with underlying moderate/severe MAC versus those with no/mild MAC. Random-effect model meta-analysis at a 95 % confidence interval was done via Cochrane Review Manager 5.4.

Results: A total of 6 studies with a pooled 2808 patients (no/mild MAC: 84.5 % vs moderate/severe MAC: 15.5 %) were included. Compared to those with no/mild MAC, patients undergoing TEER with moderate/severe MAC have an insignificant trend towards a lower immediate procedural success (OR: 0.62, 95 % CI: 0.37 - 1.04, p = 0.07). After one year of TEER, the two groups had similar rates of repeat mitral valve intervention or surgery (OR: 1.67, 95 %CI: 0.92 - 3.05, p = 0.09), sustained clinical improvement (NYHA ≤ 2) (OR: 0.86, 95 %CI: 0.64 - 1.15, p = 0.30), and heart failure re-admission (OR: 0.84, 95 %CI: 0.52 - 1.36, p = 0.48). All-cause mortality was, however, higher in the moderate/severe MAC patients (OR: 1.82, 95 %CI: 1.15 - 2.86, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: TEER appears safe and effective in carefully selected patients with significant MAC. A standardized selection algorithm is needed to identify MAC patients that would benefit most from TEER.

二尖瓣环钙化患者的经导管边缘到边缘修复:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:二尖瓣环钙化(MAC)在功能性二尖瓣反流接受经导管边缘到边缘二尖瓣修复(TEER)的患者中很常见。然而,TEER系统在MAC患者中的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。方法:我们系统地回顾了多个在线数据库,以确定报告TEER中潜在中度/重度MAC患者与无/轻度MAC患者预后的研究。通过Cochrane Review Manager 5.4进行95%置信区间的随机效应模型荟萃分析。结果:共纳入6项研究,共纳入2808例患者(无/轻度MAC: 84.5% vs中/重度MAC: 15.5%)。与无/轻度MAC患者相比,接受TEER治疗的中度/重度MAC患者的即时手术成功率较低(OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.37 - 1.04, p=0.07)。TEER治疗一年后,两组重复二尖瓣介入或手术的比率相似(or: 1.67, 95%CI: 0.92 - 3.05, p=0.09),持续临床改善(NYHA≤2)(or: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.64 - 1.15, p=0.30),心力衰竭再入院(or: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.52 - 1.36, p=0.48)。然而,中/重度MAC患者的全因死亡率更高(OR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.15 - 2.86, p = 0.01)。结论:在精心挑选的MAC显著患者中,TEER是安全有效的。需要一种标准化的选择算法来确定从TEER中获益最多的MAC患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信