Using media to enhance paediatric patient recruitment for research in primary care.

IF 1.7
Ilse N Ganzevoort, Marjolein Y Berger, Marc A Benninga, Arine M Vlieger, Gea A Holtman
{"title":"Using media to enhance paediatric patient recruitment for research in primary care.","authors":"Ilse N Ganzevoort, Marjolein Y Berger, Marc A Benninga, Arine M Vlieger, Gea A Holtman","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625100315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recruitment of participants for research is often difficult in primary care, especially children and adolescents. Poor recruitment often leads to extension or discontinuation of randomized controlled trials involving patients. This study describes the impact of media recruitment compared to recruitment via general practitioners (GPs) on characteristics of 152 children aged 7-17 years with functional abdominal pain (FAP) and irritable bowel syndrome. Demographics, clinical and psychosocial characteristics were compared. No clinically relevant differences were found, except for longer pain symptom duration and more diagnoses of FAP in children recruited via media compared to children recruited by their GP. Our results suggest that recruitment via media is effective to recruit children in primary care without inducing relevant baseline characteristic differences and this might decrease research recruitment load for GPs. Subgroup analyses on recruitment method are recommended because recruitment strategy might induce differences in unknown baseline characteristics between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625100315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recruitment of participants for research is often difficult in primary care, especially children and adolescents. Poor recruitment often leads to extension or discontinuation of randomized controlled trials involving patients. This study describes the impact of media recruitment compared to recruitment via general practitioners (GPs) on characteristics of 152 children aged 7-17 years with functional abdominal pain (FAP) and irritable bowel syndrome. Demographics, clinical and psychosocial characteristics were compared. No clinically relevant differences were found, except for longer pain symptom duration and more diagnoses of FAP in children recruited via media compared to children recruited by their GP. Our results suggest that recruitment via media is effective to recruit children in primary care without inducing relevant baseline characteristic differences and this might decrease research recruitment load for GPs. Subgroup analyses on recruitment method are recommended because recruitment strategy might induce differences in unknown baseline characteristics between groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用媒体加强初级保健研究的儿科患者招募。
在初级保健中,招募研究参与者往往很困难,尤其是儿童和青少年。招募不良往往导致涉及患者的随机对照试验延期或中止。本研究描述了媒体招募与全科医生招募对152名7-17岁功能性腹痛(FAP)和肠易激综合征儿童特征的影响。比较了人口统计学、临床和社会心理特征。与全科医生招募的儿童相比,通过媒体招募的儿童疼痛症状持续时间更长,FAP诊断更多,未发现临床相关差异。我们的研究结果表明,通过媒体招募儿童在初级保健中是有效的,而不会引起相关的基线特征差异,这可能会减少全科医生的研究招募负荷。建议对招募方法进行亚组分析,因为招募策略可能导致组间未知基线特征的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信