The stabilization and destabilization of marine carbon observations: Co-producing knowledge in murky waters.

IF 2.3
Maritime studies : MAST Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s40152-025-00435-y
Ramona Haegele
{"title":"The stabilization and destabilization of marine carbon observations: Co-producing knowledge in murky waters.","authors":"Ramona Haegele","doi":"10.1007/s40152-025-00435-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the complexities of marine carbon observations by exploring how non-humans and humans, including: scientists, floats, and geopolitics, (de-)stabilize these processes. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Brazil and Germany, the study uses Karen Barad's (2007) concept of agential realism to understand how these diverse actors are mutually co-producing knowledge on marine carbon. Instead of viewing entities as separate, intra-action emphasizes their co-constitution. Through theme-based coding, the analysis identifies both stabilizing and destabilizing forces in marine carbon observations. Stabilizing forces include the dedication of scientists, two-way communication between floats and humans, and the global accessibility of data on marine carbon observations. In contrast, destabilizing forces involve climate change's impact on data collection and quality, funding shortages, and national borders. The research highlights how geopolitical and scientific practices are deeply dynamic and often overlooked in discussions of marine carbon observations. By following non-humans and humans and incorporating diverse perspectives from the sea and land, the study provides new insights into the (un-)becoming of marine carbon observations, emphasizing the importance of the more-than-human in shaping knowledge production practices. This work underscores the value of thinking with Science and Technology Studies and new materialism about marine environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":74110,"journal":{"name":"Maritime studies : MAST","volume":"24 3","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime studies : MAST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-025-00435-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the complexities of marine carbon observations by exploring how non-humans and humans, including: scientists, floats, and geopolitics, (de-)stabilize these processes. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Brazil and Germany, the study uses Karen Barad's (2007) concept of agential realism to understand how these diverse actors are mutually co-producing knowledge on marine carbon. Instead of viewing entities as separate, intra-action emphasizes their co-constitution. Through theme-based coding, the analysis identifies both stabilizing and destabilizing forces in marine carbon observations. Stabilizing forces include the dedication of scientists, two-way communication between floats and humans, and the global accessibility of data on marine carbon observations. In contrast, destabilizing forces involve climate change's impact on data collection and quality, funding shortages, and national borders. The research highlights how geopolitical and scientific practices are deeply dynamic and often overlooked in discussions of marine carbon observations. By following non-humans and humans and incorporating diverse perspectives from the sea and land, the study provides new insights into the (un-)becoming of marine carbon observations, emphasizing the importance of the more-than-human in shaping knowledge production practices. This work underscores the value of thinking with Science and Technology Studies and new materialism about marine environments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

海洋碳观测的稳定与不稳定:混浊水域的共同生产知识。
本文通过探索非人类和人类(包括:科学家、漂浮物和地缘政治)如何(破坏)稳定这些过程,考察了海洋碳观测的复杂性。利用在巴西和德国进行的民族志田野调查,该研究使用Karen Barad(2007)的代理现实主义概念来理解这些不同的参与者如何相互共同产生关于海洋碳的知识。而不是将实体视为独立的,intra-action强调它们的共同构成。通过基于主题的编码,分析确定了海洋碳观测中的稳定和不稳定力量。稳定的力量包括科学家的奉献精神、漂浮物与人类之间的双向交流以及全球海洋碳观测数据的可及性。相反,不稳定因素包括气候变化对数据收集和质量的影响、资金短缺和国界。这项研究强调了地缘政治和科学实践在海洋碳观测的讨论中是如何深刻地动态变化的,而且经常被忽视。通过跟踪非人类和人类,并结合来自海洋和陆地的不同观点,该研究为海洋碳观测的(非)演变提供了新的见解,强调了超越人类在塑造知识生产实践中的重要性。这项工作强调了科学技术研究和新唯物主义对海洋环境的思考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信