Primary health care professionals' experiences of using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: an interview study.

IF 1.7
Amelie Mazya, Anne-Marie Boström, Christina Sandlund, Anne Wissendorff Ekdahl
{"title":"Primary health care professionals' experiences of using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: an interview study.","authors":"Amelie Mazya, Anne-Marie Boström, Christina Sandlund, Anne Wissendorff Ekdahl","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625100297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore primary health care professionals' (PHCP) experiences of frailty assessment with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) with focus on feasibility aspects.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary health care (PHC) is often the first point of contact for older people and assessment of frailty is therefore often recommended in this setting. There is however a lack of awareness of frailty in PHC. The TFI has been proposed as a suitable instrument for frailty assessment in PHC. It consists of 25 questions, where ten questions aim to identify risk factors for frailty and 15 questions assess physical, psychological, and social frailty. There are no previous studies of feasibility aspects of TFI in PHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative interview study with physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists that had used TFI in face-to-face interviews during a care visit. Interviews were transcribed and the text was thematically analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nine interviews were performed. The PHCPs experiences were expressed in one theme: <i>TFI is useful and feasible but requires time and knowledge</i>. TFI was described as easy to use and providing a holistic assessment of the patient. Using the TFI was time-consuming but provided useful information for care planning. In conclusion, the TFI could be a clinically useful tool to assess frailty in PHC. The result indicates a need of educational efforts to increase knowledge about frailty and a need for primary health care to adjust to older people in order to allow care visits to include both assessment and management of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625100297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore primary health care professionals' (PHCP) experiences of frailty assessment with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) with focus on feasibility aspects.

Background: Primary health care (PHC) is often the first point of contact for older people and assessment of frailty is therefore often recommended in this setting. There is however a lack of awareness of frailty in PHC. The TFI has been proposed as a suitable instrument for frailty assessment in PHC. It consists of 25 questions, where ten questions aim to identify risk factors for frailty and 15 questions assess physical, psychological, and social frailty. There are no previous studies of feasibility aspects of TFI in PHC.

Methods: A qualitative interview study with physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists that had used TFI in face-to-face interviews during a care visit. Interviews were transcribed and the text was thematically analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Findings: Nine interviews were performed. The PHCPs experiences were expressed in one theme: TFI is useful and feasible but requires time and knowledge. TFI was described as easy to use and providing a holistic assessment of the patient. Using the TFI was time-consuming but provided useful information for care planning. In conclusion, the TFI could be a clinically useful tool to assess frailty in PHC. The result indicates a need of educational efforts to increase knowledge about frailty and a need for primary health care to adjust to older people in order to allow care visits to include both assessment and management of frailty.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

初级卫生保健专业人员使用蒂尔堡虚弱指标的经验:一项访谈研究。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨初级卫生保健专业人员(PHCP)使用蒂尔堡虚弱指数(TFI)进行虚弱评估的经验,重点是可行性方面。背景:初级卫生保健(PHC)往往是老年人的第一个接触点,因此经常建议在这种情况下进行虚弱评估。然而,在初级保健中缺乏对脆弱性的认识。TFI已被建议作为初级保健脆弱程度评估的合适工具。它由25个问题组成,其中10个问题旨在确定脆弱的风险因素,15个问题评估身体,心理和社会脆弱性。在PHC中没有关于TFI可行性方面的研究。方法:对在一次护理访问中使用TFI的医生、护士和物理治疗师进行定性访谈研究。采访记录下来,文本使用定性内容分析进行主题分析。结果:进行了9次访谈。初级保健提供者的经验表达在一个主题中:TFI是有用和可行的,但需要时间和知识。TFI被描述为易于使用并提供对患者的整体评估。使用TFI耗时,但为护理计划提供了有用的信息。总之,TFI可作为评估PHC患者虚弱程度的临床有用工具。结果表明,需要开展教育工作,增加对虚弱的认识,初级保健需要适应老年人,以便使护理访问包括对虚弱的评估和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信