Breast and Gynecological Cancer Benefit Finding Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sıdıka Pelit Aksu , Serap Alkaş , Şengül Yaman Sözbir
{"title":"Breast and Gynecological Cancer Benefit Finding Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study","authors":"Sıdıka Pelit Aksu ,&nbsp;Serap Alkaş ,&nbsp;Şengül Yaman Sözbir","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the “Benefit Finding Scale” (BFS) in Turkish breast and gynecologic cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the methodological research, 322 women were included. Data was collected using the “Descriptive Information Form” and the “BFS.” The language, content, construct, criterion, and convergent validity of the “BFS” were examined. Content validity was assessed using the scale and the item content validity index. Construct validity was determined by Exploratory factor analysis and Confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was evaluated using internal consistency analysis, Cronbach’s <em>α</em>, and the test-retest method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses established that the scale consisted of 15 items with three factors, explaining 72.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices Goodness of Fit Index: 0.96, AGFI: 0.95, NFI: 0.95, PGFI: 0.70, RMR: 0.08. The Cronbach’s <em>α</em> for the total scale is 0.92. Within the scope of the test-retest analysis, an interclass correlation coefficient = 0.961 was determined. The scale evaluation is based on the mean scores of the subdimensions and total scores; as the score obtained from the scale increases, the benefit finding for cancer increases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings from this study conducted on a sample of breast and gynecologic cancer showed that the “BFS” is both valid and reliable for the Turkish population.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>Assessing benefit findings in women with breast and gynecologic cancer may enable nurses to provide care and psychosocial support tailored to patient’s needs, which can enhance their well-being and improve treatment adherence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"41 4","pages":"Article 151949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208125001421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the “Benefit Finding Scale” (BFS) in Turkish breast and gynecologic cancer patients.

Methods

In the methodological research, 322 women were included. Data was collected using the “Descriptive Information Form” and the “BFS.” The language, content, construct, criterion, and convergent validity of the “BFS” were examined. Content validity was assessed using the scale and the item content validity index. Construct validity was determined by Exploratory factor analysis and Confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was evaluated using internal consistency analysis, Cronbach’s α, and the test-retest method.

Results

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses established that the scale consisted of 15 items with three factors, explaining 72.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices Goodness of Fit Index: 0.96, AGFI: 0.95, NFI: 0.95, PGFI: 0.70, RMR: 0.08. The Cronbach’s α for the total scale is 0.92. Within the scope of the test-retest analysis, an interclass correlation coefficient = 0.961 was determined. The scale evaluation is based on the mean scores of the subdimensions and total scores; as the score obtained from the scale increases, the benefit finding for cancer increases.

Conclusions

The findings from this study conducted on a sample of breast and gynecologic cancer showed that the “BFS” is both valid and reliable for the Turkish population.

Implications for Nursing Practice

Assessing benefit findings in women with breast and gynecologic cancer may enable nurses to provide care and psychosocial support tailored to patient’s needs, which can enhance their well-being and improve treatment adherence.
乳腺癌和妇科癌症获益发现量表:土耳其效度和信度研究。
目的:本研究旨在确定“获益发现量表”(BFS)在土耳其乳腺癌和妇科癌症患者中的效度和信度。方法:在方法学研究中,纳入322名妇女。使用“描述性信息表”和“BFS”收集数据。考察了“BFS”的语言、内容、结构、标准和收敛效度。采用量表和项目内容效度指数评估内容效度。构念效度采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析。量表的信度采用内部一致性分析、Cronbach’s α和重测法进行评估。结果:探索性和验证性因子分析确定量表由15个条目组成,包含3个因子,解释总方差的72.5%。验证性因子分析拟合指标拟合优度指数:0.96,AGFI: 0.95, NFI: 0.95, PGFI: 0.70, RMR: 0.08。总量表的Cronbach's α为0.92。在检验-重检验分析的范围内,确定了类间相关系数 = 0.961。量表评估基于子维度的平均得分和总分;随着从量表中获得的分数增加,对癌症的益处也会增加。结论:本研究对乳腺癌和妇科癌症样本进行的研究结果表明,“BFS”对土耳其人口是有效和可靠的。对护理实践的启示:评估乳腺癌和妇科癌症患者的获益结果可能使护士能够根据患者的需求提供护理和心理社会支持,从而增强患者的幸福感并提高治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信