Utility of Triage Nurses' Quick-Look Assessments of Adults in the Emergency Department for Predicting Hospital Admission.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ryuji Suzuki, Toshihiko Takada, Jun Miyashita, Shunichi Fukuhara
{"title":"Utility of Triage Nurses' Quick-Look Assessments of Adults in the Emergency Department for Predicting Hospital Admission.","authors":"Ryuji Suzuki, Toshihiko Takada, Jun Miyashita, Shunichi Fukuhara","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses use quick-look assessments, vital signs, and interviews to predict hospital admission, but evidence for the predictive accuracy of quick-look assessments remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of quick-look assessments in predicting hospital admission for adult patients, compare their performance with the National Early Warning Score, and assess the added value of combining quick-look assessments and the National Early Warning Score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted in the emergency department of an acute care hospital. During triage, nurses predicted admission likelihood based only on quick-look assessments, without any other data such as vital signs or history of illness, with higher quick-look assessment scores indicating greater admission likelihood. The National Early Warning Score was calculated from vital sign data. Three predictive models (quick-look assessment alone, National Early Warning Score alone, and quick-look assessment + National Early Warning Score) were developed using logistic regression modeling. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve and calibration plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1588 patients, 144 (9.1%) were admitted. Higher quick-look assessment scores were associated with admission, with odds ratios of 83.8 (95% CI, 26.6-263.8) and 145.2 (95% CI, 21.4-986.4) for quick-look assessment scores of 4 and 5, respectively. The quick-look assessment model had an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), outperforming the National Early Warning Score (area under the curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.62-0.73). Adding the National Early Warning Score to quick-look assessments led to minimal improvement (area under the curve, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90). Calibration showed that quick-look assessments underestimated moderate-to-high-risk predictions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Quick-look assessments allow nurses to make accurate predictions of hospital admissions during ED triage, outperform the National Early Warning Score, and support better patient prioritization.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.06.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nurses use quick-look assessments, vital signs, and interviews to predict hospital admission, but evidence for the predictive accuracy of quick-look assessments remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of quick-look assessments in predicting hospital admission for adult patients, compare their performance with the National Early Warning Score, and assess the added value of combining quick-look assessments and the National Early Warning Score.

Methods: This prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted in the emergency department of an acute care hospital. During triage, nurses predicted admission likelihood based only on quick-look assessments, without any other data such as vital signs or history of illness, with higher quick-look assessment scores indicating greater admission likelihood. The National Early Warning Score was calculated from vital sign data. Three predictive models (quick-look assessment alone, National Early Warning Score alone, and quick-look assessment + National Early Warning Score) were developed using logistic regression modeling. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve and calibration plots.

Results: Of 1588 patients, 144 (9.1%) were admitted. Higher quick-look assessment scores were associated with admission, with odds ratios of 83.8 (95% CI, 26.6-263.8) and 145.2 (95% CI, 21.4-986.4) for quick-look assessment scores of 4 and 5, respectively. The quick-look assessment model had an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), outperforming the National Early Warning Score (area under the curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.62-0.73). Adding the National Early Warning Score to quick-look assessments led to minimal improvement (area under the curve, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90). Calibration showed that quick-look assessments underestimated moderate-to-high-risk predictions.

Discussion: Quick-look assessments allow nurses to make accurate predictions of hospital admissions during ED triage, outperform the National Early Warning Score, and support better patient prioritization.

急诊科分诊护士对成人的快速评估对预测住院的效用。
导读:护士使用快速评估、生命体征和访谈来预测住院情况,但快速评估预测准确性的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估快看评估在预测成年患者住院情况中的准确性,比较其与国家预警评分的表现,并评估快看评估与国家预警评分相结合的附加价值。方法:本前瞻性、单中心、观察性研究在一家急症护理医院的急诊科进行。在分诊过程中,护士仅根据快速评估预测入院可能性,而没有任何其他数据,如生命体征或病史,快速评估得分越高,入院可能性越大。国家早期预警评分是根据生命体征数据计算得出的。采用logistic回归模型建立了3个预测模型(单独快速评估、单独国家预警评分、快速评估+国家预警评分)。使用曲线下面积和校准图评估模型性能。结果:1588例患者中144例(9.1%)入院。较高的快速检查评分与入院相关,快速检查评分为4分和5分的比值比分别为83.8 (95% CI, 26.6-263.8)和145.2 (95% CI, 21.4-986.4)。快速评估模型的曲线下面积为0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88),优于国家预警评分(曲线下面积,0.67;95% ci, 0.62-0.73)。在快速评估中加入国家预警评分导致的改善最小(曲线下面积,0.87;95% ci, 0.83-0.90)。校准显示,快速评估低估了中等至高风险的预测。讨论:快速评估允许护士在急诊室分诊时准确预测住院情况,优于国家早期预警评分,并支持更好的患者优先排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信