Ryuji Suzuki, Toshihiko Takada, Jun Miyashita, Shunichi Fukuhara
{"title":"Utility of Triage Nurses' Quick-Look Assessments of Adults in the Emergency Department for Predicting Hospital Admission.","authors":"Ryuji Suzuki, Toshihiko Takada, Jun Miyashita, Shunichi Fukuhara","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses use quick-look assessments, vital signs, and interviews to predict hospital admission, but evidence for the predictive accuracy of quick-look assessments remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of quick-look assessments in predicting hospital admission for adult patients, compare their performance with the National Early Warning Score, and assess the added value of combining quick-look assessments and the National Early Warning Score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted in the emergency department of an acute care hospital. During triage, nurses predicted admission likelihood based only on quick-look assessments, without any other data such as vital signs or history of illness, with higher quick-look assessment scores indicating greater admission likelihood. The National Early Warning Score was calculated from vital sign data. Three predictive models (quick-look assessment alone, National Early Warning Score alone, and quick-look assessment + National Early Warning Score) were developed using logistic regression modeling. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve and calibration plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1588 patients, 144 (9.1%) were admitted. Higher quick-look assessment scores were associated with admission, with odds ratios of 83.8 (95% CI, 26.6-263.8) and 145.2 (95% CI, 21.4-986.4) for quick-look assessment scores of 4 and 5, respectively. The quick-look assessment model had an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), outperforming the National Early Warning Score (area under the curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.62-0.73). Adding the National Early Warning Score to quick-look assessments led to minimal improvement (area under the curve, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90). Calibration showed that quick-look assessments underestimated moderate-to-high-risk predictions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Quick-look assessments allow nurses to make accurate predictions of hospital admissions during ED triage, outperform the National Early Warning Score, and support better patient prioritization.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.06.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Nurses use quick-look assessments, vital signs, and interviews to predict hospital admission, but evidence for the predictive accuracy of quick-look assessments remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of quick-look assessments in predicting hospital admission for adult patients, compare their performance with the National Early Warning Score, and assess the added value of combining quick-look assessments and the National Early Warning Score.
Methods: This prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted in the emergency department of an acute care hospital. During triage, nurses predicted admission likelihood based only on quick-look assessments, without any other data such as vital signs or history of illness, with higher quick-look assessment scores indicating greater admission likelihood. The National Early Warning Score was calculated from vital sign data. Three predictive models (quick-look assessment alone, National Early Warning Score alone, and quick-look assessment + National Early Warning Score) were developed using logistic regression modeling. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve and calibration plots.
Results: Of 1588 patients, 144 (9.1%) were admitted. Higher quick-look assessment scores were associated with admission, with odds ratios of 83.8 (95% CI, 26.6-263.8) and 145.2 (95% CI, 21.4-986.4) for quick-look assessment scores of 4 and 5, respectively. The quick-look assessment model had an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), outperforming the National Early Warning Score (area under the curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.62-0.73). Adding the National Early Warning Score to quick-look assessments led to minimal improvement (area under the curve, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90). Calibration showed that quick-look assessments underestimated moderate-to-high-risk predictions.
Discussion: Quick-look assessments allow nurses to make accurate predictions of hospital admissions during ED triage, outperform the National Early Warning Score, and support better patient prioritization.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice.
The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics.
The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.