Long-Term survival of Acumed Anatomical Radial Head implant for Mason Type III-IV fractures: a 15-year follow-up.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Luigi Tarallo, Andrea Celli, Laura Benedetti, Matilde Delvecchio, Grazia Ciacca, Giuseppe Porcellini, Fabio Catani
{"title":"Long-Term survival of Acumed Anatomical Radial Head implant for Mason Type III-IV fractures: a 15-year follow-up.","authors":"Luigi Tarallo, Andrea Celli, Laura Benedetti, Matilde Delvecchio, Grazia Ciacca, Giuseppe Porcellini, Fabio Catani","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radial head fractures account for 1.7% to 5.4% of all skeletal fractures and approximately one-third of elbow fractures. These injuries are often associated with other concurrent injuries, such as fractures of the coronoid, ligamentous injuries of the elbow, or trauma to other regions of the upper limb. Intra-articular fractures, especially Mason type III and IV, often require anatomical reduction to restore the articular surface, but such procedures can yield suboptimal results, highlighting the role of radial head implants in complex cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated patients treated with Acumed Anatomical Radial Head implant from 2008 to 2023, specifically those with Mason type III and IV fractures. A total of 149 patients were included, with an average follow-up of 7 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinical outcomes, assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), showed an average score of 90, with an average range of motion of 130° in flexion and 78° in pronation and supination. Implant survival at 15 years exceeded 95%, confirming the long-term effectiveness of anatomical radial head implants. The most common complications included: heterotopic ossification with reduced joint mobility (35%), postoperative stiffness with functional limitations (9.4%), and implant loosening (4.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radial head implants offer a reliable treatment for complex Mason type III and IV fractures, with good functional and survival outcomes and a low incidence of complications. However, careful implant sizing is crucial to avoid complications such as premature loosening, joint stiffness and pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Radial head fractures account for 1.7% to 5.4% of all skeletal fractures and approximately one-third of elbow fractures. These injuries are often associated with other concurrent injuries, such as fractures of the coronoid, ligamentous injuries of the elbow, or trauma to other regions of the upper limb. Intra-articular fractures, especially Mason type III and IV, often require anatomical reduction to restore the articular surface, but such procedures can yield suboptimal results, highlighting the role of radial head implants in complex cases.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients treated with Acumed Anatomical Radial Head implant from 2008 to 2023, specifically those with Mason type III and IV fractures. A total of 149 patients were included, with an average follow-up of 7 years.

Discussion: Clinical outcomes, assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), showed an average score of 90, with an average range of motion of 130° in flexion and 78° in pronation and supination. Implant survival at 15 years exceeded 95%, confirming the long-term effectiveness of anatomical radial head implants. The most common complications included: heterotopic ossification with reduced joint mobility (35%), postoperative stiffness with functional limitations (9.4%), and implant loosening (4.7%).

Conclusions: Radial head implants offer a reliable treatment for complex Mason type III and IV fractures, with good functional and survival outcomes and a low incidence of complications. However, careful implant sizing is crucial to avoid complications such as premature loosening, joint stiffness and pain.

尖尖解剖桡骨头植入治疗Mason III-IV型骨折的长期生存率:15年随访
桡骨头骨折占所有骨骼骨折的1.7% - 5.4%,约占肘部骨折的三分之一。这些损伤通常伴有其他并发损伤,如冠状骨骨折、肘关节韧带损伤或上肢其他部位的创伤。关节内骨折,特别是Mason III型和IV型骨折,通常需要解剖复位来恢复关节面,但这种手术可能产生不理想的结果,突出了桡骨头植入物在复杂病例中的作用。材料和方法:本回顾性研究评估了2008年至2023年接受尖锐解剖桡骨头植入治疗的患者,特别是Mason III型和IV型骨折患者。共纳入149例患者,平均随访7年。讨论:临床结果,使用梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)评估,显示平均得分为90,平均屈曲活动范围为130°,旋前和旋后活动范围为78°。15年的种植成活率超过95%,证实了解剖性桡骨头种植体的长期有效性。最常见的并发症包括:异位骨化伴关节活动度降低(35%),术后僵硬伴功能限制(9.4%)和植入物松动(4.7%)。结论:桡骨头植入是治疗复杂Mason III型和IV型骨折的可靠方法,具有良好的功能和生存预后,并发症发生率低。然而,小心种植体的大小是至关重要的,以避免并发症,如过早松动,关节僵硬和疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信