The Influence of Artificial Intelligence Scribes on Clinician Experience and Efficiency among Pediatric Subspecialists: A Rapid, Randomized Quality Improvement Trial.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2657-8087
H Stella Shin, Herb Williams, Nikolay Braykov, Afrin Jahan, Jeremy Meller, Evan W Orenstein
{"title":"The Influence of Artificial Intelligence Scribes on Clinician Experience and Efficiency among Pediatric Subspecialists: A Rapid, Randomized Quality Improvement Trial.","authors":"H Stella Shin, Herb Williams, Nikolay Braykov, Afrin Jahan, Jeremy Meller, Evan W Orenstein","doi":"10.1055/a-2657-8087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) scribes may reduce the documentation burden and improve clinician experience through generative AI automatically producing provider note sections from recordings of patient-provider encounters.We aimed to examine the impact of AI scribes on clinician experience, clinician efficiency, and business efficiency measures among pediatric subspecialty physicians.We randomized pediatric subspecialty providers with ≥0.5 clinical full-time equivalent and stable electronic health record (EHR) log metrics to use Microsoft/Nuance Digital Ambient eXperience (DAX) Copilot from May 1, 2024, to July 31, 2024 (intervention group) or controls. Using difference-in-differences, we compared quantitative measures of subjective clinician experience using the KLAS Net EHR Experience survey, objective measures of clinician efficiency from EHR logs (e.g., pajama time), and business efficiency measures. At-the-elbow support checked in with intervention providers approximately weekly, and we assessed the sentiment of qualitative comments.Twelve providers were randomized to the intervention and 11 to the control group. One intervention provider stopped using DAX due to ineffectiveness. In the intervention group, DAX was used to populate one or more characters in 53% of visit notes (range across providers: 10.6-98.2%). Nine intervention and eight control providers completed pre- and postsurveys. KLAS Net EHR Experience improved among intervention providers from 52.6 (70th percentile) to 75.2 (99th percentile) but dropped from 37.3 (38th percentile) to 30 (14th percentile) among control providers. Experiencing burnout dropped from 8 (89%) to 5 (56%) among intervention providers but remained stable at 3 (38%) in the control group. There was no significant change to pajama time (-9.4 minutes per scheduled day, 95% CI: -41.2 to +22.4), time in notes per encounter (+0.2 minutes per note, 95% CI: -6.6 to +6.9), or work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) per encounter (-0.03, 95% CI: -0.5 to +0.44). Of 48 qualitative comments, 69% had a positive sentiment, 15% neutral, and 17% negative.Among pediatric subspecialists, AI scribes improved clinician experience and burnout without changing charting time or EHR work outside work hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"1041-1052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2657-8087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) scribes may reduce the documentation burden and improve clinician experience through generative AI automatically producing provider note sections from recordings of patient-provider encounters.We aimed to examine the impact of AI scribes on clinician experience, clinician efficiency, and business efficiency measures among pediatric subspecialty physicians.We randomized pediatric subspecialty providers with ≥0.5 clinical full-time equivalent and stable electronic health record (EHR) log metrics to use Microsoft/Nuance Digital Ambient eXperience (DAX) Copilot from May 1, 2024, to July 31, 2024 (intervention group) or controls. Using difference-in-differences, we compared quantitative measures of subjective clinician experience using the KLAS Net EHR Experience survey, objective measures of clinician efficiency from EHR logs (e.g., pajama time), and business efficiency measures. At-the-elbow support checked in with intervention providers approximately weekly, and we assessed the sentiment of qualitative comments.Twelve providers were randomized to the intervention and 11 to the control group. One intervention provider stopped using DAX due to ineffectiveness. In the intervention group, DAX was used to populate one or more characters in 53% of visit notes (range across providers: 10.6-98.2%). Nine intervention and eight control providers completed pre- and postsurveys. KLAS Net EHR Experience improved among intervention providers from 52.6 (70th percentile) to 75.2 (99th percentile) but dropped from 37.3 (38th percentile) to 30 (14th percentile) among control providers. Experiencing burnout dropped from 8 (89%) to 5 (56%) among intervention providers but remained stable at 3 (38%) in the control group. There was no significant change to pajama time (-9.4 minutes per scheduled day, 95% CI: -41.2 to +22.4), time in notes per encounter (+0.2 minutes per note, 95% CI: -6.6 to +6.9), or work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) per encounter (-0.03, 95% CI: -0.5 to +0.44). Of 48 qualitative comments, 69% had a positive sentiment, 15% neutral, and 17% negative.Among pediatric subspecialists, AI scribes improved clinician experience and burnout without changing charting time or EHR work outside work hours.

人工智能抄写员对儿科专科临床医生经验和效率的影响:一项快速随机质量改进试验。
背景:人工智能(AI)抄写员可以通过生成式AI自动从患者-提供者接触的记录中生成提供者笔记部分,从而减轻文档负担并改善临床医生的体验。方法:从2024年5月1日至7月31日(干预组),随机选择临床全职当量≥0.5且电子健康记录(EHR)日志指标稳定的儿科亚专科医生使用Microsoft/Nuance Digital Ambient eXperience (DAX) Copilot辅助驾驶。利用差异中的差异,我们比较了使用KLAS网络电子病历经验调查的主观临床医生经验的定量测量,从电子病历日志(如睡衣时间)中获得的临床医生效率的客观测量,以及业务效率测量。在肘部支持大约每周与干预提供者进行检查,我们评估定性评论的情绪。结果:干预组12名,对照组10名。一家干预提供者由于无效而停止使用DAX。在干预组中,DAX被用于在53%的就诊记录中填充≥1个字符(各提供者的范围:10.6%至98.2%)。9个干预提供者和7个对照提供者完成了前后调查。干预提供者的KLAS净电子病历体验从52.6(第70百分位数)改善到75.2(第99百分位数),但对照组提供者从37.3(第38百分位数)下降到30(第14百分位数)。在干预提供者中,经历过倦怠的人数从8人(89%)下降到5人(56%),但在对照组中保持稳定在3人(43%)。睡衣时间(每个预定日-9.4分钟,95% CI: -41.2至+22.4)、每次就诊记录时间(每次就诊记录+0.2分钟,95% CI: -6.6至+6.9)或每次就诊工作相对价值单位(wRVUs) (-0.03, 95% CI: -0.5至+0.44)均无显著变化。在48条定性评论中,69%的人持积极态度,15%的人持中立态度,17%的人持消极态度。结论:在儿科专科医生中,人工智能书写员在不改变工作时间或电子病历工作的情况下改善了临床医生的经验和倦怠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信