Re-consent practices in biobanks in Japan: current status and stakeholder perspectives.

IF 1.8 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Journal of Community Genetics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s12687-025-00820-4
Hiroko Terui-Kohbata, Hiyori Ueda, Masayuki Yoshida
{"title":"Re-consent practices in biobanks in Japan: current status and stakeholder perspectives.","authors":"Hiroko Terui-Kohbata, Hiyori Ueda, Masayuki Yoshida","doi":"10.1007/s12687-025-00820-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric research in rare diseases relies on sharing biological specimens, clinical data, and analytical information among researchers. Re-consent is essential in longitudinal biobank (BB) research to ensure that pediatric participants remain informed and willing to continue. However, the issue of re-consent-obtaining consent once participants reach adulthood-remains a significant ethical concern. This study examined the current practices of re-consent acquisition in Japanese BBs and explores stakeholder opinions regarding genomic data sharing. A survey of 41 BBs revealed that only 25% of those handling pediatric samples obtained re-consent, all via written informed consent. Although 71% of respondents recognized the necessity of re-consent, the methods used to obtain it varied. Stakeholders identified ethical and logistical challenges, including privacy concerns and administrative burden. Various re-consent methods were suggested, with preferences depending on feasibility and ethical considerations. The findings highlight the need for policy discussions to balance data-sharing benefits with participant rights and privacy protection in pediatric genomic research. Determining optimal re-consent methods requires continued stakeholder engagement, including research participants and the public.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"639-645"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00820-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric research in rare diseases relies on sharing biological specimens, clinical data, and analytical information among researchers. Re-consent is essential in longitudinal biobank (BB) research to ensure that pediatric participants remain informed and willing to continue. However, the issue of re-consent-obtaining consent once participants reach adulthood-remains a significant ethical concern. This study examined the current practices of re-consent acquisition in Japanese BBs and explores stakeholder opinions regarding genomic data sharing. A survey of 41 BBs revealed that only 25% of those handling pediatric samples obtained re-consent, all via written informed consent. Although 71% of respondents recognized the necessity of re-consent, the methods used to obtain it varied. Stakeholders identified ethical and logistical challenges, including privacy concerns and administrative burden. Various re-consent methods were suggested, with preferences depending on feasibility and ethical considerations. The findings highlight the need for policy discussions to balance data-sharing benefits with participant rights and privacy protection in pediatric genomic research. Determining optimal re-consent methods requires continued stakeholder engagement, including research participants and the public.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

日本生物银行的再同意实践:现状和利益相关者的观点。
罕见病的儿科研究依赖于研究人员之间共享生物标本、临床数据和分析信息。再次同意在纵向生物库(BB)研究中至关重要,以确保儿科参与者保持知情并愿意继续。然而,重新同意的问题——一旦参与者成年后获得同意——仍然是一个重要的伦理问题。本研究考察了日本BBs中重新获得同意的现行做法,并探讨了利益相关者对基因组数据共享的看法。一项对41个BBs的调查显示,只有25%的处理儿科样本的人通过书面知情同意获得了再次同意。尽管71%的受访者承认再次同意的必要性,但获得再次同意的方法各不相同。利益相关者确定了道德和后勤方面的挑战,包括隐私问题和行政负担。提出了各种重新同意的方法,选择取决于可行性和伦理考虑。研究结果强调了在儿童基因组研究中进行政策讨论以平衡数据共享利益与参与者权利和隐私保护的必要性。确定最佳的再同意方法需要利益相关者的持续参与,包括研究参与者和公众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信