Looking back and abroad while (not) moving forward. Migration, ideas and the stability of citizenship in Spain.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1570110
Francesco Pasetti, Reinhard Schweitzer
{"title":"Looking back and abroad while (not) moving forward. Migration, ideas and the stability of citizenship in Spain.","authors":"Francesco Pasetti, Reinhard Schweitzer","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2025.1570110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article addresses the remarkable stability of the Spanish citizenship regime. Since it was established in 1982, it has remained largely unchanged, despite the country's rapid transformation from a country of emigration to a major destination for non-EU immigrants. We complement existing explanations for this phenomenon by shifting the analytical focus to the realm of ideas. Based on a close analysis of the law-making process and parliamentary debates about citizenship reforms between 1978 and 2024, we argue that this puzzling stability can partly be attributed to the widely shared and remarkably stable way in which the country's political elite conceives nationality. We identify three constitutive elements that make this dominant citizenship frame: (i) the preference for blood-ties over territorial presence, (ii) the preferential treatment of emigrants (and their descendants) over immigrants, and (iii) the predilection for potential citizens' historical over contemporary connections to Spain. This set of ideas, in which political parties' views overlap, has constituted the tracks along which the country's nationality laws have evolved. It has outlived not only demographic but also political changes including the appearance of the country's first far-right, anti-immigrant party. By focusing on ideas, this article offers a new analytical and less deterministic perspective, complementing the explanatory backdrop provided to date by the scholarship concerned with citizenship law-making. Our findings and analysis contribute to a fuller understanding of the politics of citizenship in Spain and-more generally-of the ambiguous role that past, present, and future migratory dynamics (can) play in shaping-the evolution of citizenship law-making. It thereby also contributes to the literature on the multifaceted nexus between citizenship and migration and to broader debates on the importance of ideas in public policymaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"10 ","pages":"1570110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1570110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the remarkable stability of the Spanish citizenship regime. Since it was established in 1982, it has remained largely unchanged, despite the country's rapid transformation from a country of emigration to a major destination for non-EU immigrants. We complement existing explanations for this phenomenon by shifting the analytical focus to the realm of ideas. Based on a close analysis of the law-making process and parliamentary debates about citizenship reforms between 1978 and 2024, we argue that this puzzling stability can partly be attributed to the widely shared and remarkably stable way in which the country's political elite conceives nationality. We identify three constitutive elements that make this dominant citizenship frame: (i) the preference for blood-ties over territorial presence, (ii) the preferential treatment of emigrants (and their descendants) over immigrants, and (iii) the predilection for potential citizens' historical over contemporary connections to Spain. This set of ideas, in which political parties' views overlap, has constituted the tracks along which the country's nationality laws have evolved. It has outlived not only demographic but also political changes including the appearance of the country's first far-right, anti-immigrant party. By focusing on ideas, this article offers a new analytical and less deterministic perspective, complementing the explanatory backdrop provided to date by the scholarship concerned with citizenship law-making. Our findings and analysis contribute to a fuller understanding of the politics of citizenship in Spain and-more generally-of the ambiguous role that past, present, and future migratory dynamics (can) play in shaping-the evolution of citizenship law-making. It thereby also contributes to the literature on the multifaceted nexus between citizenship and migration and to broader debates on the importance of ideas in public policymaking.

回顾过去和国外,而(不)前进。移民、思想和西班牙公民身份的稳定。
本文论述了西班牙公民制度的显著稳定性。自1982年成立以来,尽管该国迅速从一个移民国家转变为非欧盟移民的主要目的地,但它在很大程度上保持不变。我们通过将分析焦点转移到思想领域来补充对这一现象的现有解释。基于对1978年至2024年间关于公民身份改革的立法过程和议会辩论的仔细分析,我们认为,这种令人费解的稳定在一定程度上可以归因于该国政治精英对国籍的普遍认同和非常稳定的看法。我们确定了构成这一主导公民身份框架的三个构成要素:(i)对血缘关系的偏好高于领土存在,(ii)对移民(及其后代)的优待高于移民,以及(iii)对潜在公民与西班牙的历史联系的偏好高于当代联系。这一套观点,即各政党的观点重叠,构成了国家国籍法演变的轨迹。它不仅经受住了人口结构的考验,也经受住了政治变革的考验,包括该国第一个反移民的极右翼政党的出现。通过关注思想,本文提供了一个新的分析性的、不那么确定性的视角,补充了迄今为止有关公民立法的学术所提供的解释背景。我们的发现和分析有助于更全面地理解西班牙的公民政治,以及更广泛地理解过去、现在和未来的移民动态在塑造公民立法演变过程中所扮演的模糊角色。因此,它也有助于关于公民身份和移民之间多方面联系的文献,以及关于公共政策制定中思想重要性的更广泛辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信