Efficiency loss with binary pre-processing of continuous monitoring data.

IF 0.8 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Paula R Langner, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Lucas N Marzec, Gary K Grunwald, John D Rice
{"title":"Efficiency loss with binary pre-processing of continuous monitoring data.","authors":"Paula R Langner, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Lucas N Marzec, Gary K Grunwald, John D Rice","doi":"10.1007/s12561-025-09473-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In studies with a recurrent event outcome, events may be captured as counts during subsequent intervals or follow-up times either by design or for ease of analysis. In many cases, recurrent events may be further coarsened such that only an indicator of one or more events in an interval is observed at the follow-up time, resulting in a loss of information relative to a record of all events. In this paper, we examine efficiency loss when coarsening longitudinally observed counts to binary indicators and aspects of the design which impact the ability to estimate a treatment effect of interest. The investigation was motivated by a study of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in which investigators aimed to examine the effect of a treatment on events detected by the devices over time. In order to study components of such a recurrent event process impacted by data coarsening, we derive the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of a treatment effect estimator utilizing a coarsened binary outcome relative to an alternative estimator using the count outcome. We compare the efficiencies and consider conditions where the binary process maintains good efficiency in estimating a treatment effect. We present an application of the methods to a data set consisting of seizure counts in a sample of patients with epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45094,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Biosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-025-09473-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In studies with a recurrent event outcome, events may be captured as counts during subsequent intervals or follow-up times either by design or for ease of analysis. In many cases, recurrent events may be further coarsened such that only an indicator of one or more events in an interval is observed at the follow-up time, resulting in a loss of information relative to a record of all events. In this paper, we examine efficiency loss when coarsening longitudinally observed counts to binary indicators and aspects of the design which impact the ability to estimate a treatment effect of interest. The investigation was motivated by a study of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in which investigators aimed to examine the effect of a treatment on events detected by the devices over time. In order to study components of such a recurrent event process impacted by data coarsening, we derive the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of a treatment effect estimator utilizing a coarsened binary outcome relative to an alternative estimator using the count outcome. We compare the efficiencies and consider conditions where the binary process maintains good efficiency in estimating a treatment effect. We present an application of the methods to a data set consisting of seizure counts in a sample of patients with epilepsy.

连续监测数据二进制预处理的效率损失。
在具有重复事件结果的研究中,出于设计或便于分析的目的,可以在后续间隔或随访时间内以计数的形式捕获事件。在许多情况下,反复发生的事件可能会进一步粗化,以便在后续时间中只观察到间隔内一个或多个事件的指标,从而导致相对于所有事件记录的信息丢失。在本文中,我们研究了当纵向观察到的计数粗化到二元指标和影响估计感兴趣的治疗效果的设计方面时的效率损失。这项调查的动机是一项对心脏植入式电子设备患者的研究,研究人员旨在检查治疗对设备随时间检测到的事件的影响。为了研究这种受数据粗化影响的反复事件过程的组成部分,我们推导了使用粗化二进制结果的治疗效果估计器相对于使用计数结果的替代估计器的渐近相对效率(ARE)。我们比较了效率,并考虑了二元过程在估计处理效果时保持良好效率的条件。我们提出了一个应用的方法,以数据集组成的癫痫患者的样本发作计数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Biosciences
Statistics in Biosciences MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Statistics in Biosciences (SIBS) is published three times a year in print and electronic form. It aims at development and application of statistical methods and their interface with other quantitative methods, such as computational and mathematical methods, in biological and life science, health science, and biopharmaceutical and biotechnological science. SIBS publishes scientific papers and review articles in four sections, with the first two sections as the primary sections. Original Articles publish novel statistical and quantitative methods in biosciences. The Bioscience Case Studies and Practice Articles publish papers that advance statistical practice in biosciences, such as case studies, innovative applications of existing methods that further understanding of subject-matter science, evaluation of existing methods and data sources. Review Articles publish papers that review an area of statistical and quantitative methodology, software, and data sources in biosciences. Commentaries provide perspectives of research topics or policy issues that are of current quantitative interest in biosciences, reactions to an article published in the journal, and scholarly essays. Substantive science is essential in motivating and demonstrating the methodological development and use for an article to be acceptable. Articles published in SIBS share the goal of promoting evidence-based real world practice and policy making through effective and timely interaction and communication of statisticians and quantitative researchers with subject-matter scientists in biosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信