Paula R Langner, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Lucas N Marzec, Gary K Grunwald, John D Rice
{"title":"Efficiency loss with binary pre-processing of continuous monitoring data.","authors":"Paula R Langner, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Lucas N Marzec, Gary K Grunwald, John D Rice","doi":"10.1007/s12561-025-09473-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In studies with a recurrent event outcome, events may be captured as counts during subsequent intervals or follow-up times either by design or for ease of analysis. In many cases, recurrent events may be further coarsened such that only an indicator of one or more events in an interval is observed at the follow-up time, resulting in a loss of information relative to a record of all events. In this paper, we examine efficiency loss when coarsening longitudinally observed counts to binary indicators and aspects of the design which impact the ability to estimate a treatment effect of interest. The investigation was motivated by a study of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in which investigators aimed to examine the effect of a treatment on events detected by the devices over time. In order to study components of such a recurrent event process impacted by data coarsening, we derive the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of a treatment effect estimator utilizing a coarsened binary outcome relative to an alternative estimator using the count outcome. We compare the efficiencies and consider conditions where the binary process maintains good efficiency in estimating a treatment effect. We present an application of the methods to a data set consisting of seizure counts in a sample of patients with epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45094,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Biosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-025-09473-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In studies with a recurrent event outcome, events may be captured as counts during subsequent intervals or follow-up times either by design or for ease of analysis. In many cases, recurrent events may be further coarsened such that only an indicator of one or more events in an interval is observed at the follow-up time, resulting in a loss of information relative to a record of all events. In this paper, we examine efficiency loss when coarsening longitudinally observed counts to binary indicators and aspects of the design which impact the ability to estimate a treatment effect of interest. The investigation was motivated by a study of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices in which investigators aimed to examine the effect of a treatment on events detected by the devices over time. In order to study components of such a recurrent event process impacted by data coarsening, we derive the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of a treatment effect estimator utilizing a coarsened binary outcome relative to an alternative estimator using the count outcome. We compare the efficiencies and consider conditions where the binary process maintains good efficiency in estimating a treatment effect. We present an application of the methods to a data set consisting of seizure counts in a sample of patients with epilepsy.
期刊介绍:
Statistics in Biosciences (SIBS) is published three times a year in print and electronic form. It aims at development and application of statistical methods and their interface with other quantitative methods, such as computational and mathematical methods, in biological and life science, health science, and biopharmaceutical and biotechnological science.
SIBS publishes scientific papers and review articles in four sections, with the first two sections as the primary sections. Original Articles publish novel statistical and quantitative methods in biosciences. The Bioscience Case Studies and Practice Articles publish papers that advance statistical practice in biosciences, such as case studies, innovative applications of existing methods that further understanding of subject-matter science, evaluation of existing methods and data sources. Review Articles publish papers that review an area of statistical and quantitative methodology, software, and data sources in biosciences. Commentaries provide perspectives of research topics or policy issues that are of current quantitative interest in biosciences, reactions to an article published in the journal, and scholarly essays. Substantive science is essential in motivating and demonstrating the methodological development and use for an article to be acceptable. Articles published in SIBS share the goal of promoting evidence-based real world practice and policy making through effective and timely interaction and communication of statisticians and quantitative researchers with subject-matter scientists in biosciences.