MET Alterations in Cancer and MET-Targeted Therapy: Detection Strategies, Treatment Efficacy, and Emerging Technologies.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jieun Park, Chaithanya Chelakkot, Ji-Hye Nam, Hun Seok Lee, Chae Rin Kim, Yeonwoo Lee, Mi-Sook Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Young Kee Shin
{"title":"MET Alterations in Cancer and MET-Targeted Therapy: Detection Strategies, Treatment Efficacy, and Emerging Technologies.","authors":"Jieun Park, Chaithanya Chelakkot, Ji-Hye Nam, Hun Seok Lee, Chae Rin Kim, Yeonwoo Lee, Mi-Sook Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Young Kee Shin","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01166-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The MET signaling pathway is dysregulated in several cancers through various mechanisms, including gene mutations, amplifications, rearrangements, and protein overexpression. MET inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefits in solid tumors including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), highlighting the importance of optimizing MET alteration detection methods and cut-off values to enhance the efficacy of MET-targeted therapies and improve patient outcomes. Research on MET alterations has primarily focused on MET exon 14 skipping mutations, MET amplification, and MET overexpression. This review summarizes the frequency of MET alterations across different cancer types and the clinical validation of MET alterations in MET-targeted therapies, offering a detailed comparison of objective response rates (ORR) for therapies including crizotinib, capmatinib, tepotinib, savolitinib, telisotuzumab vedotin, telisotuzumab adizutecan, and amivantamab. The review also addresses the challenges in detecting MET exon 14 skipping mutations, such as issues with false positives and negatives, and underscores the need for standardization in MET amplification detection. Trials vary in their cut-offs for MET gene copy number (GCN) and MET/CEP7 ratio and MET expression detection methods, leading to inconsistencies in detection. Additionally, emerging technologies such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cell (CTC) analyses have been investigated for their potential to improve MET alterations detection. This review also highlights studies that demonstrate the potential of MET ctDNA and CTC analyses to predict treatment responses and identify resistance mechanisms in MET-targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01166-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The MET signaling pathway is dysregulated in several cancers through various mechanisms, including gene mutations, amplifications, rearrangements, and protein overexpression. MET inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefits in solid tumors including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), highlighting the importance of optimizing MET alteration detection methods and cut-off values to enhance the efficacy of MET-targeted therapies and improve patient outcomes. Research on MET alterations has primarily focused on MET exon 14 skipping mutations, MET amplification, and MET overexpression. This review summarizes the frequency of MET alterations across different cancer types and the clinical validation of MET alterations in MET-targeted therapies, offering a detailed comparison of objective response rates (ORR) for therapies including crizotinib, capmatinib, tepotinib, savolitinib, telisotuzumab vedotin, telisotuzumab adizutecan, and amivantamab. The review also addresses the challenges in detecting MET exon 14 skipping mutations, such as issues with false positives and negatives, and underscores the need for standardization in MET amplification detection. Trials vary in their cut-offs for MET gene copy number (GCN) and MET/CEP7 ratio and MET expression detection methods, leading to inconsistencies in detection. Additionally, emerging technologies such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cell (CTC) analyses have been investigated for their potential to improve MET alterations detection. This review also highlights studies that demonstrate the potential of MET ctDNA and CTC analyses to predict treatment responses and identify resistance mechanisms in MET-targeted therapies.

癌症中的MET改变和MET靶向治疗:检测策略、治疗效果和新兴技术。
MET信号通路在多种癌症中通过多种机制失调,包括基因突变、扩增、重排和蛋白质过表达。MET抑制剂在包括非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)在内的实体肿瘤中已显示出临床益处,这突出了优化MET改变检测方法和临界值以增强MET靶向治疗疗效和改善患者预后的重要性。对MET改变的研究主要集中在MET外显子14跳跃突变、MET扩增和MET过表达。本综述总结了MET改变在不同癌症类型中的频率,以及MET靶向治疗中MET改变的临床验证,并详细比较了包括克唑替尼、卡马替尼、替波替尼、萨沃替尼、特利妥珠单抗、特利妥珠单抗和阿米万他单抗在内的治疗的客观缓解率(ORR)。本文还讨论了检测MET外显子14跳过突变的挑战,如假阳性和假阴性问题,并强调了MET扩增检测标准化的必要性。试验对MET基因拷贝数(GCN)、MET/CEP7比率和MET表达检测方法的截止值不同,导致检测结果不一致。此外,诸如循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)和循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)分析等新兴技术已经被研究用于改善MET改变检测的潜力。本综述还重点介绍了MET ctDNA和CTC分析在MET靶向治疗中预测治疗反应和确定耐药机制方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信