The nationwide survey of Japanese public opinion about off-label use of anticancer drugs recommended by comprehensive genomic profiling.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Junichi Matsubara, Kumi Mukai, Manabu Muto
{"title":"The nationwide survey of Japanese public opinion about off-label use of anticancer drugs recommended by comprehensive genomic profiling.","authors":"Junichi Matsubara, Kumi Mukai, Manabu Muto","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02809-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)-guided precision medicine enables identification of molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT), including off-label uses of anticancer drugs for rare genomic alterations. However, in Japan, access to such off-label drugs is limited despite their potential therapeutic benefits. This study aimed to investigate public attitudes toward off-label use of anticancer drugs in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide online survey was conducted in Japan from February 15 to 19, 2024, targeting cancer patients (CA), medical professionals (MP), and non-cancer volunteers (non-CA) aged 40 + years. This included explanatory materials on CGP and MBRT, and questionnaires assessing willingness to use off-label drugs in various cost scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,261 responses were analyzed: 419 CA, 430 MP, and 412 non-CA participants (median age: 59, range 40-89). Approximately 80% of MPs reported high comprehension of the explanatory materials (Top-2 box on a 5-point Likert scale), compared with ~ 60% of CA and < 50% of non-CA participants. Willingness to use off-label drugs (Top-2 box) was as follows: \"No cost burden\": 51% CA, 62% MP, and 50% non-CA; \"Cost ¥200,000 per month (approximately $US1,300)\": 15% CA, 31% MP, and 15% non-CA; \"Cost ¥1,000,000 per month (approximately $US6,700)\": 6% CA, 16% MP, and 4% non-CA. Higher comprehension of explanatory materials was associated with greater willingness to use off-label drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over half of respondents were willing to use off-label anticancer drugs if they were free of charge. However, willingness declined significantly with cost. Policy frameworks are needed in Japan to improve access to CGP-guided off-label therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1692-1699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02809-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)-guided precision medicine enables identification of molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT), including off-label uses of anticancer drugs for rare genomic alterations. However, in Japan, access to such off-label drugs is limited despite their potential therapeutic benefits. This study aimed to investigate public attitudes toward off-label use of anticancer drugs in Japan.

Methods: A nationwide online survey was conducted in Japan from February 15 to 19, 2024, targeting cancer patients (CA), medical professionals (MP), and non-cancer volunteers (non-CA) aged 40 + years. This included explanatory materials on CGP and MBRT, and questionnaires assessing willingness to use off-label drugs in various cost scenarios.

Results: A total of 1,261 responses were analyzed: 419 CA, 430 MP, and 412 non-CA participants (median age: 59, range 40-89). Approximately 80% of MPs reported high comprehension of the explanatory materials (Top-2 box on a 5-point Likert scale), compared with ~ 60% of CA and < 50% of non-CA participants. Willingness to use off-label drugs (Top-2 box) was as follows: "No cost burden": 51% CA, 62% MP, and 50% non-CA; "Cost ¥200,000 per month (approximately $US1,300)": 15% CA, 31% MP, and 15% non-CA; "Cost ¥1,000,000 per month (approximately $US6,700)": 6% CA, 16% MP, and 4% non-CA. Higher comprehension of explanatory materials was associated with greater willingness to use off-label drugs.

Conclusions: Over half of respondents were willing to use off-label anticancer drugs if they were free of charge. However, willingness declined significantly with cost. Policy frameworks are needed in Japan to improve access to CGP-guided off-label therapies.

Abstract Image

综合基因组图谱推荐的抗肿瘤药物超说明书使用的日本公众意见的全国性调查。
背景:综合基因组谱(CGP)引导的精准医学能够识别基于分子的推荐疗法(MBRT),包括针对罕见基因组改变的抗癌药物的标签外使用。然而,在日本,尽管有潜在的治疗益处,但获得此类非标签药物的机会有限。本研究旨在调查日本公众对超说明书使用抗癌药物的态度。方法:于2024年2月15日至19日在日本进行了一项全国性的在线调查,目标是40岁以上的癌症患者(CA),医疗专业人员(MP)和非癌症志愿者(non-CA)。这包括关于CGP和MBRT的解释性材料,以及评估在各种成本情况下使用超说明书药物意愿的问卷。结果:共分析了1,261份应答:419名CA, 430名MP和412名非CA参与者(中位年龄:59岁,范围40-89岁)。大约80%的MPs报告了对解释性材料的高度理解(5点李克特量表的前2框),相比之下,约60%的CA和结论:超过一半的受访者愿意使用非标签抗癌药物,如果他们是免费的。然而,意愿随着成本的增加而显著下降。日本需要制定政策框架,以改善获得cgp指导的标签外治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信