Optimizing radiation therapy for merkel cell carcinoma: evaluating prognostic factors and treatment outcomes.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Minori Niwa, Masanari Niwa, Natsuo Tomita, Hiromichi Ishiyama, Ayaka Uchida, Yukihiko Oshima, Hirota Takano, Masayuki Matsuo, Mayu Kuno, Akifumi Miyakawa, Shinya Otsuka, Toru Matsui, Shintaro Yamamoto, Taiki Takaoka, Dai Okazaki, Akira Torii, Nozomi Kita, Seiya Takano, Motoki Nakamura, Hiroshi Kato, Akimichi Morita, Akio Hiwatashi
{"title":"Optimizing radiation therapy for merkel cell carcinoma: evaluating prognostic factors and treatment outcomes.","authors":"Minori Niwa, Masanari Niwa, Natsuo Tomita, Hiromichi Ishiyama, Ayaka Uchida, Yukihiko Oshima, Hirota Takano, Masayuki Matsuo, Mayu Kuno, Akifumi Miyakawa, Shinya Otsuka, Toru Matsui, Shintaro Yamamoto, Taiki Takaoka, Dai Okazaki, Akira Torii, Nozomi Kita, Seiya Takano, Motoki Nakamura, Hiroshi Kato, Akimichi Morita, Akio Hiwatashi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02838-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. Surgery and radiation therapy (RT) are common treatment options; however, an optimal RT strategy has yet to be established. Therefore, the present study examined the outcomes of MCC patients treated with RT, with the aim of elucidating current RT practices and identifying prognostic factors for RT optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of 32 non-metastatic MCC patients treated with RT. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Log-rank test was used to examine the effect of each factor on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 80 years, with a median follow-up period of 26 months. The median dose was 52 Gy in 26 fractions and combined with surgery in 23 patients. Two-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 94, 61, and 74%, respectively. The Log-rank test showed that tumor size ≥ 5 cm was associated with worse LC (p = 0.03). Male sex and the absence of surgery correlated with worse PFS (p = 0.047 and 0.023, respectively). Performance status ≥ 2, the absence of surgery, and RT margin < 3 cm correlated with worse OS (p = 0.006, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). RT dose, intensity-modulated RT, and elective nodal irradiation were not associated with any outcomes in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RT achieved high local control; however, the metastasis rates were high. A wide RT margin and the combination of RT with surgery may improve the outcomes of MCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02838-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. Surgery and radiation therapy (RT) are common treatment options; however, an optimal RT strategy has yet to be established. Therefore, the present study examined the outcomes of MCC patients treated with RT, with the aim of elucidating current RT practices and identifying prognostic factors for RT optimization.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 32 non-metastatic MCC patients treated with RT. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Log-rank test was used to examine the effect of each factor on outcomes.

Results: Median age was 80 years, with a median follow-up period of 26 months. The median dose was 52 Gy in 26 fractions and combined with surgery in 23 patients. Two-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 94, 61, and 74%, respectively. The Log-rank test showed that tumor size ≥ 5 cm was associated with worse LC (p = 0.03). Male sex and the absence of surgery correlated with worse PFS (p = 0.047 and 0.023, respectively). Performance status ≥ 2, the absence of surgery, and RT margin < 3 cm correlated with worse OS (p = 0.006, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). RT dose, intensity-modulated RT, and elective nodal irradiation were not associated with any outcomes in this population.

Conclusion: RT achieved high local control; however, the metastasis rates were high. A wide RT margin and the combination of RT with surgery may improve the outcomes of MCC patients.

优化放射治疗默克尔细胞癌:评估预后因素和治疗结果。
背景:默克尔细胞癌(MCC)是一种高度侵袭性的神经内分泌皮肤癌。手术和放射治疗(RT)是常见的治疗选择;然而,一个最优的RT策略尚未建立。因此,本研究考察了MCC患者接受RT治疗的结果,旨在阐明目前的RT做法,并确定RT优化的预后因素。方法:回顾性分析32例接受rt治疗的非转移性MCC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算局部对照(LC)、无进展生存(PFS)和总生存(OS)率。采用Log-rank检验检验各因素对结果的影响。结果:中位年龄80岁,中位随访26个月。中位剂量为52 Gy,分26个部分,23例患者联合手术。两年LC、PFS和OS率分别为94%、61%和74%。Log-rank检验显示肿瘤大小≥5 cm与LC恶化相关(p = 0.03)。男性和未手术与较差的PFS相关(p分别= 0.047和0.023)。功能状态≥2,无手术,RT切缘结论:RT达到了较高的局部控制性;然而,转移率高。较宽的放疗范围和手术联合放疗可改善MCC患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信