Faecal occult blood testing: a review of its use and common misutilisation.

IF 2.9 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gabriela Méndez, Lucía Rivera-Matos, Asim Shuja
{"title":"Faecal occult blood testing: a review of its use and common misutilisation.","authors":"Gabriela Méndez, Lucía Rivera-Matos, Asim Shuja","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with early detection being crucial for improving patient outcomes. While colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening, stool-based tests such as guaiac-based faecal occult blood test and faecal immunochemical test offer non-invasive and cost-effective alternatives. These tests have proven value in the outpatient screening of asymptomatic, average-risk individuals; however, their frequent misuse in inpatient settings limits their diagnostic accuracy and utility. Inappropriate use of faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) in hospitalised patients often results in false-positive or false-negative findings, leading to unnecessary diagnostic procedures, delayed treatment, increased healthcare costs and potential patient harm. Addressing this issue requires promoting adherence to guideline-based use of FOBT, alongside targeted provider education to reduce misuse, improve diagnostic precision and optimise patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with early detection being crucial for improving patient outcomes. While colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening, stool-based tests such as guaiac-based faecal occult blood test and faecal immunochemical test offer non-invasive and cost-effective alternatives. These tests have proven value in the outpatient screening of asymptomatic, average-risk individuals; however, their frequent misuse in inpatient settings limits their diagnostic accuracy and utility. Inappropriate use of faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) in hospitalised patients often results in false-positive or false-negative findings, leading to unnecessary diagnostic procedures, delayed treatment, increased healthcare costs and potential patient harm. Addressing this issue requires promoting adherence to guideline-based use of FOBT, alongside targeted provider education to reduce misuse, improve diagnostic precision and optimise patient care.

粪便隐血检测:回顾其使用和常见的误用。
结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是世界范围内癌症相关发病率和死亡率的主要原因,早期发现对于改善患者预后至关重要。结肠镜检查是CRC筛查的金标准,基于粪便的检查,如愈创木粪便隐血检查和粪便免疫化学检查提供了非侵入性和成本效益高的替代方法。这些测试已被证明在门诊筛查无症状,平均风险个体的价值;然而,他们在住院设置频繁误用限制了他们的诊断准确性和效用。在住院患者中不恰当地使用粪便隐血检查(FOBTs)往往会导致假阳性或假阴性结果,从而导致不必要的诊断程序、延误治疗、增加医疗保健费用和潜在的患者伤害。解决这一问题需要促进遵守基于指南的FOBT使用,同时有针对性地对提供者进行教育,以减少滥用,提高诊断准确性和优化患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信