The resource requirements of perioperative patient warming in German hospitals - the results of a prospective, multicenter activity-based costing study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Stefan Nardi-Hiebl, Jan Wallenborn, Martin Schniertshauer, Tilo Koch, Tobias Gruebl, Alexander Torossian
{"title":"The resource requirements of perioperative patient warming in German hospitals - the results of a prospective, multicenter activity-based costing study.","authors":"Stefan Nardi-Hiebl, Jan Wallenborn, Martin Schniertshauer, Tilo Koch, Tobias Gruebl, Alexander Torossian","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03240-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative warming is essential in preventing hypothermia during surgery, a condition linked to adverse outcomes like increased infection rates, impaired coagulation, and extended hospital stays. Despite the availability of various active warming methods, such as forced-air warming (FAW) and electric warming systems, their implementation and associated costs vary significantly across hospitals, impacting resource allocation and patient care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used a prospective, multicenter, activity-based costing approach across four German hospitals with diverse capacities. The activity-based costing model identified and measured staff time, material use, and direct costs linked to perioperative warming processes in a sample of 225 surgical patients. Warming processes were assessed across stages, including pre-warming, intraoperative warming, and post-anesthesia care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings show significant variability in the time and cost associated with perioperative warming across institutions. The average total cost per patient between all sites ranged from EUR 3.52 to EUR 49.26, with an overall mean cost of EUR 12.29 per patient. Staff time also varied, with nurses contributing most of the required time dedicated to warming activities. At all sites, FAW was the available method during surgery, but inconsistent practices and reliance on supplemental strategies lead to considerable cost variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study illustrates potential operational and financial challenges of perioperative warming, revealing significant variability in costs and resource requirements across hospitals, influenced by institutional infrastructure, workflow efficiency and case mix. The findings also emphasize the importance of optimizing workflows and adopting best practices tailored to resource constraints. Future research should address these gaps by exploring cost-effective warming protocols, balancing efficiency with care quality, and refining workflows to enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03240-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perioperative warming is essential in preventing hypothermia during surgery, a condition linked to adverse outcomes like increased infection rates, impaired coagulation, and extended hospital stays. Despite the availability of various active warming methods, such as forced-air warming (FAW) and electric warming systems, their implementation and associated costs vary significantly across hospitals, impacting resource allocation and patient care.

Method: This study used a prospective, multicenter, activity-based costing approach across four German hospitals with diverse capacities. The activity-based costing model identified and measured staff time, material use, and direct costs linked to perioperative warming processes in a sample of 225 surgical patients. Warming processes were assessed across stages, including pre-warming, intraoperative warming, and post-anesthesia care.

Results: Findings show significant variability in the time and cost associated with perioperative warming across institutions. The average total cost per patient between all sites ranged from EUR 3.52 to EUR 49.26, with an overall mean cost of EUR 12.29 per patient. Staff time also varied, with nurses contributing most of the required time dedicated to warming activities. At all sites, FAW was the available method during surgery, but inconsistent practices and reliance on supplemental strategies lead to considerable cost variations.

Conclusion: This study illustrates potential operational and financial challenges of perioperative warming, revealing significant variability in costs and resource requirements across hospitals, influenced by institutional infrastructure, workflow efficiency and case mix. The findings also emphasize the importance of optimizing workflows and adopting best practices tailored to resource constraints. Future research should address these gaps by exploring cost-effective warming protocols, balancing efficiency with care quality, and refining workflows to enhance patient outcomes.

德国医院围手术期患者暖化的资源需求——一项前瞻性、多中心活动成本研究的结果。
背景:围手术期保温对于预防手术期间的低温至关重要,低温与感染率增加、凝血功能受损和住院时间延长等不良后果有关。尽管有各种主动加热方法,如强制空气加热(FAW)和电加热系统,但它们的实施和相关成本在医院之间差异很大,影响了资源分配和患者护理。方法:本研究采用前瞻性、多中心、基于作业的成本核算方法,跨越四家不同能力的德国医院。基于作业的成本计算模型确定并测量了225例手术患者围手术期加热过程相关的员工时间、材料使用和直接成本。暖化过程在不同阶段进行评估,包括暖化前、术中暖化和麻醉后护理。结果:研究结果显示各机构围手术期暖化相关的时间和成本存在显著差异。所有地点的每位患者的平均总成本从3.52欧元到49.26欧元不等,每位患者的总平均成本为12.29欧元。工作人员的时间也各不相同,护士贡献了大部分所需的时间用于暖场活动。在所有地点,FAW是手术期间可用的方法,但不一致的做法和对补充策略的依赖导致了相当大的成本变化。结论:本研究揭示了围手术期暖化的潜在运营和财务挑战,揭示了医院成本和资源需求的显著差异,受机构基础设施、工作流程效率和病例组合的影响。研究结果还强调了优化工作流程和采用针对资源限制的最佳实践的重要性。未来的研究应通过探索具有成本效益的升温方案,平衡效率与护理质量,改进工作流程以提高患者的治疗效果来解决这些差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信