The effectiveness of combining ursodeoxycholic acid with vitamin D in treating patients with primary biliary cholangitis and its impact on hepatic fibrosis: a randomized trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yilihamu Abulitifu, Mierzhati Maimaiti, Fengcong Zhao, Munire Adilijiang, Wen Qian, Yongping Zhang
{"title":"The effectiveness of combining ursodeoxycholic acid with vitamin D in treating patients with primary biliary cholangitis and its impact on hepatic fibrosis: a randomized trial.","authors":"Yilihamu Abulitifu, Mierzhati Maimaiti, Fengcong Zhao, Munire Adilijiang, Wen Qian, Yongping Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-04118-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of combining ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and vitamin D (VitD) in treating patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and its impact on hepatic fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective analysis was conducted on 60 treatment-naive PBC patients who were admitted to our Infectious Diseases Department and outpatient clinic from May 2021 to December 2022. All patients were taking UDCA capsules orally for one year and were randomly divided into two groups: UDCA + VitD group, which received UDCA combined with VitD (1200 IU/day) treatment, and the UDCA monotherapy group. After one year of treatment, the UDCA monotherapy group was then further stratified into two subgroups using the same method, and treatment was extended for an additional year, to further verify the role of VitD in the treatment of PBC with UDCA. Clinical manifestations, blood tests, and imaging tests were collected before and after treatment. The efficacy was evaluated using the Paris I and Barcelona standards, and the improvement of liver stiffness value was assessed according to the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using FibroTouch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After one year of treatment, the UDCA + VitD group showed statistically significant decreases in AST, GGT, ALP, Tbil, PT, INR, IgM and LSM levels, and increases in ALB and 25(OH)D levels compared to the UDCA monotherapy group. The 25(OH)D levels had a negative correlation with LSM levels. Additionally, 80.0% of patients in the UDCA + VitD group responded according to the Paris I criteria, while 86.7% responded according to the Barcelona criteria, 50.0% of patients in the UDCA monotherapy group responded according to the Paris I criteria and 63.3% responded according to the Barcelona criteria. The response rate in the UDCA + VitD group was higher than that in the UDCA monotherapy group under both criteria. In the second year of the study after the second randomization, 86.7% of patients responded according to the Paris I criteria in the UDCA + VitD subgroup, while 93.3% responded according to the Barcelona criteria. 53.3% of patients in the UDCA monotherapy subgroup responded according to the Paris I criteria and 66.7% according to the Barcelona criteria. The UDCA + VitD subgroup had a higher Paris I response rate compared with the UDCA monotherapy subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of UDCA and VitD can increase the drug response rate of UDCA and improve liver function and hepatic fibrosis in PBC patients. VitD may plays an important role in the treatment of PBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12272999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04118-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of combining ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and vitamin D (VitD) in treating patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and its impact on hepatic fibrosis.

Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted on 60 treatment-naive PBC patients who were admitted to our Infectious Diseases Department and outpatient clinic from May 2021 to December 2022. All patients were taking UDCA capsules orally for one year and were randomly divided into two groups: UDCA + VitD group, which received UDCA combined with VitD (1200 IU/day) treatment, and the UDCA monotherapy group. After one year of treatment, the UDCA monotherapy group was then further stratified into two subgroups using the same method, and treatment was extended for an additional year, to further verify the role of VitD in the treatment of PBC with UDCA. Clinical manifestations, blood tests, and imaging tests were collected before and after treatment. The efficacy was evaluated using the Paris I and Barcelona standards, and the improvement of liver stiffness value was assessed according to the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using FibroTouch.

Results: After one year of treatment, the UDCA + VitD group showed statistically significant decreases in AST, GGT, ALP, Tbil, PT, INR, IgM and LSM levels, and increases in ALB and 25(OH)D levels compared to the UDCA monotherapy group. The 25(OH)D levels had a negative correlation with LSM levels. Additionally, 80.0% of patients in the UDCA + VitD group responded according to the Paris I criteria, while 86.7% responded according to the Barcelona criteria, 50.0% of patients in the UDCA monotherapy group responded according to the Paris I criteria and 63.3% responded according to the Barcelona criteria. The response rate in the UDCA + VitD group was higher than that in the UDCA monotherapy group under both criteria. In the second year of the study after the second randomization, 86.7% of patients responded according to the Paris I criteria in the UDCA + VitD subgroup, while 93.3% responded according to the Barcelona criteria. 53.3% of patients in the UDCA monotherapy subgroup responded according to the Paris I criteria and 66.7% according to the Barcelona criteria. The UDCA + VitD subgroup had a higher Paris I response rate compared with the UDCA monotherapy subgroup.

Conclusions: The combination of UDCA and VitD can increase the drug response rate of UDCA and improve liver function and hepatic fibrosis in PBC patients. VitD may plays an important role in the treatment of PBC.

熊去氧胆酸联合维生素D治疗原发性胆管炎的有效性及其对肝纤维化的影响:一项随机试验
目的:探讨熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)联合维生素D (VitD)治疗原发性胆道胆管炎(PBC)的疗效及对肝纤维化的影响。方法:对2021年5月至2022年12月我院感染性疾病科及门诊收治的60例初治PBC患者进行前瞻性分析。所有患者口服UDCA胶囊1年,随机分为UDCA + VitD组(UDCA联合VitD (1200 IU/天)治疗)和UDCA单药治疗组。治疗一年后,UDCA单药治疗组采用相同的方法进一步分为两个亚组,并延长治疗一年,以进一步验证VitD在UDCA治疗PBC中的作用。收集治疗前后的临床表现、血液检查和影像学检查。采用Paris I和Barcelona标准评价疗效,采用FibroTouch肝刚度测量法(LSM)评价肝刚度值的改善情况。结果:治疗1年后,UDCA + VitD组AST、GGT、ALP、Tbil、PT、INR、IgM、LSM水平较UDCA单药治疗组降低,ALB、25(OH)D水平升高,差异有统计学意义。25(OH)D水平与LSM水平呈负相关。此外,UDCA + VitD组中80.0%的患者符合巴黎I标准,而86.7%的患者符合巴塞罗那标准,UDCA单药治疗组中50.0%的患者符合巴黎I标准,63.3%的患者符合巴塞罗那标准。两种标准下,UDCA + VitD组的有效率均高于UDCA单药治疗组。在第二次随机化后的研究第二年,UDCA + VitD亚组中86.7%的患者符合Paris I标准,而93.3%的患者符合Barcelona标准。UDCA单药治疗亚组中53.3%的患者符合Paris I标准,66.7%符合Barcelona标准。与UDCA单药治疗亚组相比,UDCA + VitD亚组具有更高的Paris I缓解率。结论:UDCA联合VitD可提高UDCA的药物反应率,改善PBC患者肝功能和肝纤维化。VitD可能在PBC的治疗中起重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信