{"title":"Reflections on dynamic prediction of Alzheimer's disease: advancements in modeling longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data.","authors":"Durong Chen, Meiling Zhang, Hongjuan Han, Yalu Wen, Hongmei Yu","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02618-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individualized prediction of health outcomes supports clinical medicine and decision making. Our primary objective was to offer a comprehensive survey of methods for the dynamic prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD), encompassing both conventional statistical methods and deep learning techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles were sourced from PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases using keywords related to dynamic prediction of AD. A set of criteria was developed to identify included studies. The correlation information for the construction of models was extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four methodological frameworks for dynamic prediction from 18 studies with two-stage model (n = 3), joint model (n = 11), landmark model (n = 2) and deep learning (n = 2). We reported and summarized the specific construction of models and their applications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each framework possesses distinctive principles and attendant benefits. The dynamic prediction models excel in predicting the prognosis of individual patients in a real-time manner, surpassing the limitations of traditional baseline-only prediction models. Future work should consider various data types, complex longitudinal data, missing data, assumption violations, survival outcomes, and interpretability of models.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02618-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Individualized prediction of health outcomes supports clinical medicine and decision making. Our primary objective was to offer a comprehensive survey of methods for the dynamic prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD), encompassing both conventional statistical methods and deep learning techniques.
Methods: Articles were sourced from PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases using keywords related to dynamic prediction of AD. A set of criteria was developed to identify included studies. The correlation information for the construction of models was extracted.
Results: We identified four methodological frameworks for dynamic prediction from 18 studies with two-stage model (n = 3), joint model (n = 11), landmark model (n = 2) and deep learning (n = 2). We reported and summarized the specific construction of models and their applications.
Conclusions: Each framework possesses distinctive principles and attendant benefits. The dynamic prediction models excel in predicting the prognosis of individual patients in a real-time manner, surpassing the limitations of traditional baseline-only prediction models. Future work should consider various data types, complex longitudinal data, missing data, assumption violations, survival outcomes, and interpretability of models.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.