Simon Tiziani, Julian Scherer, Patrick Saurenmann, Sasha Halvachizadeh, Roman Pfeifer, Kai Sprengel, Hans-Christoph Pape, Georg Osterhoff
{"title":"Using the Timed Up and Go test to measure mobility in non-geriatric patients after pelvic ring injury.","authors":"Simon Tiziani, Julian Scherer, Patrick Saurenmann, Sasha Halvachizadeh, Roman Pfeifer, Kai Sprengel, Hans-Christoph Pape, Georg Osterhoff","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05992-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic ring injuries are rare injuries that frequently are associated with prolonged recovery and low return-to-work rates. Since radiological outcome not always correlates with overall patient-reported outcome, the assessement of functional outcome has become a focus of follow up. The Timed-Up and Go test (TUG) would be a simple way to quantify patient mobility, but has not yet been adequately validated in a non-geriatric patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients younger than 70 years who underwent functional outcome testing as routine follow-up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, or 6 months after pelvic ring injuries between 11/2017 and 10/2018 were included in this study. In addition to a TUG test, all patients completed a specific functional outcome score for pelvic ring injuries (Majeed-Score) and a general health score (Eq. 5D-3 L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients (mean age 40 years, range 18 to 68 years, 24 female), ) of which 28 were treated operatively were included in the study. The mean Majeed-Score was 75.0 (SD 23.3, range 20 to 100) and the mean Eq. 5D-3 L-VAS was 69.9 (SD 22.5, range 5 to 100). The mean time for TUG was 7.8 s. (SD 4.1, range 2 to 22.). TUG time strongly correlated with the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.633, p = 0.0001) and with the mobility portion of the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.524, p = 0.001). For a threshold value of 10 s in the TUG test, the ROC analysis revealed a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 82% in predicting an impaired Majeed score of below 60 (AUC 0.935).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TUG correlated strongly with the Majeed score and the mobility part of the Majeed-Score indicating that achieved values reflect the subjective accounts provided by patients. The TUG can be used as a quick screening in non-geriatric patients with pelvic ring injuries to quantify mobility. A TUG longer than 10 s indicates an impaired Majeed score. For academic purposes, however, it should be accompanied by the Majeed-Score.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05992-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pelvic ring injuries are rare injuries that frequently are associated with prolonged recovery and low return-to-work rates. Since radiological outcome not always correlates with overall patient-reported outcome, the assessement of functional outcome has become a focus of follow up. The Timed-Up and Go test (TUG) would be a simple way to quantify patient mobility, but has not yet been adequately validated in a non-geriatric patient population.
Methods: Consecutive patients younger than 70 years who underwent functional outcome testing as routine follow-up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, or 6 months after pelvic ring injuries between 11/2017 and 10/2018 were included in this study. In addition to a TUG test, all patients completed a specific functional outcome score for pelvic ring injuries (Majeed-Score) and a general health score (Eq. 5D-3 L).
Results: Forty patients (mean age 40 years, range 18 to 68 years, 24 female), ) of which 28 were treated operatively were included in the study. The mean Majeed-Score was 75.0 (SD 23.3, range 20 to 100) and the mean Eq. 5D-3 L-VAS was 69.9 (SD 22.5, range 5 to 100). The mean time for TUG was 7.8 s. (SD 4.1, range 2 to 22.). TUG time strongly correlated with the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.633, p = 0.0001) and with the mobility portion of the Majeed-Score (r= - 0.524, p = 0.001). For a threshold value of 10 s in the TUG test, the ROC analysis revealed a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 82% in predicting an impaired Majeed score of below 60 (AUC 0.935).
Conclusion: The TUG correlated strongly with the Majeed score and the mobility part of the Majeed-Score indicating that achieved values reflect the subjective accounts provided by patients. The TUG can be used as a quick screening in non-geriatric patients with pelvic ring injuries to quantify mobility. A TUG longer than 10 s indicates an impaired Majeed score. For academic purposes, however, it should be accompanied by the Majeed-Score.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).