Auger electron-emitting EGFR-targeted and non-targeted [197Hg]Hg-gold nanoparticles for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

IF 4.4 Q1 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR
Madeline K Brown, Zhongli Cai, Constantine J Georgiou, Shaohuang Chen, Yumeela Ganga-Sah, Valery Radchenko, James T Rutka, Raymond M Reilly
{"title":"Auger electron-emitting EGFR-targeted and non-targeted [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-gold nanoparticles for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).","authors":"Madeline K Brown, Zhongli Cai, Constantine J Georgiou, Shaohuang Chen, Yumeela Ganga-Sah, Valery Radchenko, James T Rutka, Raymond M Reilly","doi":"10.1186/s41181-025-00367-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We describe here radiation nanomedicines for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) composed of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) that integrate the Auger electron-emitter, <sup>197</sup>Hg. [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs were conjugated to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) panitumumab or were non-targeted. Our aim was to compare the cytotoxicity and DNA-damaging properties in vitro of panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs and non-targeted [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs on U251-Luc human GBM cells and estimate their cellular dosimetry. We further aimed to compare the biodistribution in vivo of panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs and [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs after convection-enhanced delivery (CED) in NRG mice with U251-Luc tumours in the brain and estimate the absorbed doses in the tumour and surrounding margins of healthy brain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs (26.8 ± 6.4 nm) were produced with a radiochemical yield of 98 ± 1% by incorporating <sup>197</sup>Hg into the Turkevich synthesis method, forming a mercury-gold amalgam. Panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs exhibited high affinity (K<sub>D</sub> = 1.8 × 10<sup>-9</sup> mol/L) binding to EGFR-positive U251-Luc cells. The binding of panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs to U251-Luc cells was 15-fold higher than [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs, and internalization and nuclear uptake were 12-fold and 18-fold greater, respectively. Panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs caused 84-fold more DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in U251-Luc cells than [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs. Panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs were ninefold more effective at reducing the clonogenic survival of U251-Luc cells than [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs. Panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs were twofold more cytotoxic than non-radioactive panitumumab-AuNPs (P = 0.04) and fivefold more cytotoxic than panitumumab (P = 0.01). The absorbed doses in the nucleus of U251-Luc cells treated in vitro with panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs or [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs were 8.8 ± 2.9 Gy and 0.6 ± 0.1 Gy, respectively. SPECT/CT imaging showed that panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs and [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs were strongly retained at the infusion site in the brain after CED up to 7 d in NRG mice with orthotopic U251-Luc tumours. Uptake of panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs in the tumour-bearing right hemisphere [484.5% injected dose/g (%ID/g)] was 172-fold and 579-fold greater than in the healthy left hemisphere and cerebellum, respectively. The uptake of [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs (423.9% ID/g) in the tumour-bearing right hemisphere was 85-fold and 64-fold higher than the left hemisphere and cerebellum, respectively. Most normal tissue uptake was < 1% ID/g, except for kidneys (9-20% ID/g), spleen (3.5-6.6% ID/g) and liver (0.6-3.3% ID/g). Dosimetry showed that 58% of the tumour received > 190 Gy for CED of 1.0 MBq of panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs vs. 0.6% of the tumour for non-targeted [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs, but both agents deposited > 50 Gy in 95% of the tumour. Doses decreased dramatically to 1.7 and 3.3 Gy at 1-3 mm from the tumour edge for panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs and [<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiation nanomedicines incorporating the AE-emitter, <sup>197</sup>Hg administered by CED are a promising approach to treatment of GBM. Panitumumab-[<sup>197</sup>Hg]Hg-AuNPs are particularly attractive due to their EGFR-mediated binding, internalization and nuclear importation in GBM cells, which amplifies their in vitro cytotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":534,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry","volume":"10 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-025-00367-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We describe here radiation nanomedicines for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) composed of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) that integrate the Auger electron-emitter, 197Hg. [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs were conjugated to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) panitumumab or were non-targeted. Our aim was to compare the cytotoxicity and DNA-damaging properties in vitro of panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs and non-targeted [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs on U251-Luc human GBM cells and estimate their cellular dosimetry. We further aimed to compare the biodistribution in vivo of panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs and [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs after convection-enhanced delivery (CED) in NRG mice with U251-Luc tumours in the brain and estimate the absorbed doses in the tumour and surrounding margins of healthy brain.

Results: [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs (26.8 ± 6.4 nm) were produced with a radiochemical yield of 98 ± 1% by incorporating 197Hg into the Turkevich synthesis method, forming a mercury-gold amalgam. Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs exhibited high affinity (KD = 1.8 × 10-9 mol/L) binding to EGFR-positive U251-Luc cells. The binding of panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs to U251-Luc cells was 15-fold higher than [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs, and internalization and nuclear uptake were 12-fold and 18-fold greater, respectively. Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs caused 84-fold more DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in U251-Luc cells than [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs. Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs were ninefold more effective at reducing the clonogenic survival of U251-Luc cells than [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs. Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs were twofold more cytotoxic than non-radioactive panitumumab-AuNPs (P = 0.04) and fivefold more cytotoxic than panitumumab (P = 0.01). The absorbed doses in the nucleus of U251-Luc cells treated in vitro with panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs or [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs were 8.8 ± 2.9 Gy and 0.6 ± 0.1 Gy, respectively. SPECT/CT imaging showed that panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs and [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs were strongly retained at the infusion site in the brain after CED up to 7 d in NRG mice with orthotopic U251-Luc tumours. Uptake of panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs in the tumour-bearing right hemisphere [484.5% injected dose/g (%ID/g)] was 172-fold and 579-fold greater than in the healthy left hemisphere and cerebellum, respectively. The uptake of [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs (423.9% ID/g) in the tumour-bearing right hemisphere was 85-fold and 64-fold higher than the left hemisphere and cerebellum, respectively. Most normal tissue uptake was < 1% ID/g, except for kidneys (9-20% ID/g), spleen (3.5-6.6% ID/g) and liver (0.6-3.3% ID/g). Dosimetry showed that 58% of the tumour received > 190 Gy for CED of 1.0 MBq of panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs vs. 0.6% of the tumour for non-targeted [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs, but both agents deposited > 50 Gy in 95% of the tumour. Doses decreased dramatically to 1.7 and 3.3 Gy at 1-3 mm from the tumour edge for panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs and [197Hg]Hg-AuNPs, respectively.

Conclusion: Radiation nanomedicines incorporating the AE-emitter, 197Hg administered by CED are a promising approach to treatment of GBM. Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs are particularly attractive due to their EGFR-mediated binding, internalization and nuclear importation in GBM cells, which amplifies their in vitro cytotoxicity.

俄格电子发射egfr靶向和非靶向[197Hg] hg -金纳米颗粒治疗多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)。
背景:我们在此描述了针对多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的辐射纳米药物,该药物由整合了Auger电子发射器197Hg的金纳米颗粒(AuNPs)组成。[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs与抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)帕尼单抗结合或非靶向。我们的目的是比较panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs和非靶向[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs对U251-Luc人GBM细胞的体外细胞毒性和dna损伤特性,并评估它们的细胞剂量学。我们进一步旨在比较paritumumab -[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs和[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs在具有U251-Luc肿瘤的NRG小鼠体内对流增强递送(CED)后的生物分布,并估计肿瘤和健康大脑周围边缘的吸收剂量。结果:在Turkevich合成法中加入197Hg,得到[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs(26.8±6.4 nm),放射化学产率为98±1%。Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs与egfr阳性的U251-Luc细胞具有高亲和力(KD = 1.8 × 10-9 mol/L)。panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs与U251-Luc细胞的结合是[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs的15倍,内化和核摄取分别是[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs的12倍和18倍。Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs在U251-Luc细胞中引起的DNA双链断裂(DSBs)比[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs多84倍。Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs在降低U251-Luc细胞克隆性存活方面的有效性是[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs的9倍。Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs的细胞毒性比非放射性Panitumumab- aunps高2倍(P = 0.04),比Panitumumab高5倍(P = 0.01)。panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs和[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs体外处理U251-Luc细胞的细胞核吸收剂量分别为8.8±2.9 Gy和0.6±0.1 Gy。SPECT/CT成像显示,pitumumab -[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs和[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs在患有正位U251-Luc肿瘤的NRG小鼠中,在CED后长达7 d的大脑输注部位被强烈保留。帕尼珠单抗-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs在荷瘤右半球的摄取[484.5%注射剂量/g (%ID/g)]分别是健康左半球和小脑的172倍和579倍。荷瘤右半球对[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs的摄取(423.9% ID/g)分别比左半球和小脑高85倍和64倍。panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs的正常组织摄取为1.0 MBq的CED为190 Gy,而非靶向[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs的正常组织摄取为0.6%,但两种药物在95%的肿瘤中沉积了50 Gy。panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs和[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs的剂量分别在距肿瘤边缘1- 3mm处急剧下降至1.7 Gy和3.3 Gy。结论:含ae -发射器、197Hg的辐射纳米药物是治疗GBM的一种很有前途的方法。Panitumumab-[197Hg]Hg-AuNPs因其egfr介导的GBM细胞结合、内化和核输入而特别具有吸引力,这增强了其体外细胞毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信