Lohitvenkatesh Oswal , Mary Sue Gorski , Catherine Woodard
{"title":"Potential discrimination in nursing complaint intake cases","authors":"Lohitvenkatesh Oswal , Mary Sue Gorski , Catherine Woodard","doi":"10.1016/j.jnr.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many leading nursing and healthcare organizations have called for discrimination against patients and nurses to be addressed. Discrimination has been identified as a factor contributing to nursing workforce shortages and other prominent issues. However, few existing studies have looked at regulation or disciplinary cases in particular.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Closed Washington State Board of Nursing (WABON) disciplinary cases were reviewed to identify instances of discrimination that may have been better addressed through opening the case for investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifty-nine closed nursing complaint cases were found across 6 months that had elements of implicit and explicit bias and potential discrimination. A descriptive qualitative approach was used to characterize the types of discrimination that arose in our collected cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 59 total collected cases, discrimination was identified across 37 cases (62.7 %). Among the 9 types of discrimination identified, race (15 cases), disability (12 cases), and sex (10 cases) were the most commonly identified types of discrimination. Many cases reported multiple instances of discrimination—a total of 57 references to a type of discrimination were found across the 37 cases. Intersectional discrimination was noted among cases that referenced two or more types of discrimination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study will be used to better understand discrimination complaints and improve intake processes for these cases. At the WABON, we used study results to improve disciplinary processes: updating our complaint intake form with new questions regarding discrimination, updating our criteria for opening cases, and publishing a policy statement on discrimination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"16 2","pages":"Pages 92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825625000754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Many leading nursing and healthcare organizations have called for discrimination against patients and nurses to be addressed. Discrimination has been identified as a factor contributing to nursing workforce shortages and other prominent issues. However, few existing studies have looked at regulation or disciplinary cases in particular.
Purpose
Closed Washington State Board of Nursing (WABON) disciplinary cases were reviewed to identify instances of discrimination that may have been better addressed through opening the case for investigation.
Methods
Fifty-nine closed nursing complaint cases were found across 6 months that had elements of implicit and explicit bias and potential discrimination. A descriptive qualitative approach was used to characterize the types of discrimination that arose in our collected cases.
Results
Of 59 total collected cases, discrimination was identified across 37 cases (62.7 %). Among the 9 types of discrimination identified, race (15 cases), disability (12 cases), and sex (10 cases) were the most commonly identified types of discrimination. Many cases reported multiple instances of discrimination—a total of 57 references to a type of discrimination were found across the 37 cases. Intersectional discrimination was noted among cases that referenced two or more types of discrimination.
Conclusion
This study will be used to better understand discrimination complaints and improve intake processes for these cases. At the WABON, we used study results to improve disciplinary processes: updating our complaint intake form with new questions regarding discrimination, updating our criteria for opening cases, and publishing a policy statement on discrimination.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.