Potential discrimination in nursing complaint intake cases

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Lohitvenkatesh Oswal , Mary Sue Gorski , Catherine Woodard
{"title":"Potential discrimination in nursing complaint intake cases","authors":"Lohitvenkatesh Oswal ,&nbsp;Mary Sue Gorski ,&nbsp;Catherine Woodard","doi":"10.1016/j.jnr.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many leading nursing and healthcare organizations have called for discrimination against patients and nurses to be addressed. Discrimination has been identified as a factor contributing to nursing workforce shortages and other prominent issues. However, few existing studies have looked at regulation or disciplinary cases in particular.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Closed Washington State Board of Nursing (WABON) disciplinary cases were reviewed to identify instances of discrimination that may have been better addressed through opening the case for investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifty-nine closed nursing complaint cases were found across 6 months that had elements of implicit and explicit bias and potential discrimination. A descriptive qualitative approach was used to characterize the types of discrimination that arose in our collected cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 59 total collected cases, discrimination was identified across 37 cases (62.7 %). Among the 9 types of discrimination identified, race (15 cases), disability (12 cases), and sex (10 cases) were the most commonly identified types of discrimination. Many cases reported multiple instances of discrimination—a total of 57 references to a type of discrimination were found across the 37 cases. Intersectional discrimination was noted among cases that referenced two or more types of discrimination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study will be used to better understand discrimination complaints and improve intake processes for these cases. At the WABON, we used study results to improve disciplinary processes: updating our complaint intake form with new questions regarding discrimination, updating our criteria for opening cases, and publishing a policy statement on discrimination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"16 2","pages":"Pages 92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825625000754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many leading nursing and healthcare organizations have called for discrimination against patients and nurses to be addressed. Discrimination has been identified as a factor contributing to nursing workforce shortages and other prominent issues. However, few existing studies have looked at regulation or disciplinary cases in particular.

Purpose

Closed Washington State Board of Nursing (WABON) disciplinary cases were reviewed to identify instances of discrimination that may have been better addressed through opening the case for investigation.

Methods

Fifty-nine closed nursing complaint cases were found across 6 months that had elements of implicit and explicit bias and potential discrimination. A descriptive qualitative approach was used to characterize the types of discrimination that arose in our collected cases.

Results

Of 59 total collected cases, discrimination was identified across 37 cases (62.7 %). Among the 9 types of discrimination identified, race (15 cases), disability (12 cases), and sex (10 cases) were the most commonly identified types of discrimination. Many cases reported multiple instances of discrimination—a total of 57 references to a type of discrimination were found across the 37 cases. Intersectional discrimination was noted among cases that referenced two or more types of discrimination.

Conclusion

This study will be used to better understand discrimination complaints and improve intake processes for these cases. At the WABON, we used study results to improve disciplinary processes: updating our complaint intake form with new questions regarding discrimination, updating our criteria for opening cases, and publishing a policy statement on discrimination.
护理投诉受理案件中可能存在的歧视
许多领先的护理和医疗保健组织呼吁解决对患者和护士的歧视问题。歧视已被确定为导致护理人员短缺和其他突出问题的一个因素。然而,很少有现有的研究特别关注监管或纪律案件。目的已关闭的华盛顿州护理委员会(WABON)纪律案件进行审查,以确定歧视的情况下,可能已经更好地解决通过开放案件进行调查。方法对6个月间59例存在显性、隐性偏见及潜在歧视的护理投诉进行回顾性分析。描述性定性方法用于描述我们收集的病例中出现的歧视类型。结果59例患者中,有37例(62.7%)存在歧视。在确定的9种歧视类型中,种族(15例)、残疾(12例)和性别(10例)是最常见的歧视类型。许多案件报告了多重歧视事件——在37起案件中,总共发现了57起涉及一种歧视的案件。在涉及两种或两种以上歧视的案件中注意到交叉歧视。结论本研究将有助于更好地了解歧视投诉,并改善此类案件的受理流程。在WABON,我们利用研究结果来改进纪律处分程序:更新我们的投诉接收表格,加入有关歧视的新问题,更新我们的案件审理标准,并发布关于歧视的政策声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信