A systematic review of personal and situational factors associated with intercultural adaptation of international students: Unravelling the resources and demands

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Werede Tareke Gebregergis , Csilla Csukonyi
{"title":"A systematic review of personal and situational factors associated with intercultural adaptation of international students: Unravelling the resources and demands","authors":"Werede Tareke Gebregergis ,&nbsp;Csilla Csukonyi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid increase in international student mobility has led to a growing body of empirical research examining the factors affecting the students’ intercultural adaptation processes and outcomes. This highlights the need for a systematic analysis to understand and organize these factors comprehensively. Previous reviews in this area have primarily focused on studies conducted in specific regions, such as the US, China, and Australia. In contrast, this review analyzed 48 quantitative studies published between 2010 and 2024 across 25 countries, involving 17,774 participants. The analysis reveals a sharp increase in publications, particularly since 2018, with the International Journal of Intercultural Relations emerging as the leading outlet for research in this field. Building on Job Demands-Resources theory, the review identifies five key clusters of factors influencing intercultural adaptation: personal resources, situational resources, personal demands, situational demands, and demographic factors. The findings of the review reveal that personal resources (e.g., emotional intelligence, cultural intelligence, psychological capital, self-determination, multicultural personality, personal growth initiatives, academic self-efficacy) and situational resources (e.g., social support, social connectedness, attachment, social media use) play a critical role in facilitating adaptation. Conversely, personal demands (e.g., acculturative stress, academic strain, intergroup anxiety) and situational demands (e.g., perceived discrimination, cultural distance, sociocultural difficulties) negatively impact adaptation outcomes. Demographic factors (e.g., gender, age, and educational level) are also associated with adaptation, though the results remain inconsistent. The review also addresses the quality assessment of methods, research gaps, limitations, and implications, emphasizing the importance of these findings in understanding the intercultural adaptation of international students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725001154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid increase in international student mobility has led to a growing body of empirical research examining the factors affecting the students’ intercultural adaptation processes and outcomes. This highlights the need for a systematic analysis to understand and organize these factors comprehensively. Previous reviews in this area have primarily focused on studies conducted in specific regions, such as the US, China, and Australia. In contrast, this review analyzed 48 quantitative studies published between 2010 and 2024 across 25 countries, involving 17,774 participants. The analysis reveals a sharp increase in publications, particularly since 2018, with the International Journal of Intercultural Relations emerging as the leading outlet for research in this field. Building on Job Demands-Resources theory, the review identifies five key clusters of factors influencing intercultural adaptation: personal resources, situational resources, personal demands, situational demands, and demographic factors. The findings of the review reveal that personal resources (e.g., emotional intelligence, cultural intelligence, psychological capital, self-determination, multicultural personality, personal growth initiatives, academic self-efficacy) and situational resources (e.g., social support, social connectedness, attachment, social media use) play a critical role in facilitating adaptation. Conversely, personal demands (e.g., acculturative stress, academic strain, intergroup anxiety) and situational demands (e.g., perceived discrimination, cultural distance, sociocultural difficulties) negatively impact adaptation outcomes. Demographic factors (e.g., gender, age, and educational level) are also associated with adaptation, though the results remain inconsistent. The review also addresses the quality assessment of methods, research gaps, limitations, and implications, emphasizing the importance of these findings in understanding the intercultural adaptation of international students.
与国际学生跨文化适应相关的个人和情境因素的系统回顾:揭示资源和需求
随着国际学生流动性的迅速增加,越来越多的实证研究开始审视影响学生跨文化适应过程和结果的因素。这就突出了对这些因素进行系统分析、全面理解和组织的必要性。这一领域以前的综述主要集中在特定地区进行的研究,如美国、中国和澳大利亚。相比之下,本综述分析了2010年至2024年间在25个国家发表的48项定量研究,涉及17,774名参与者。分析显示,特别是自2018年以来,出版物急剧增加,《国际跨文化关系杂志》成为该领域研究的主要渠道。在工作需求-资源理论的基础上,本文确定了影响跨文化适应的五个关键因素集群:个人资源、情境资源、个人需求、情境需求和人口因素。研究发现,个人资源(如情绪智力、文化智力、心理资本、自我决定、多元文化人格、个人成长主动性、学业自我效能感)和情境资源(如社会支持、社会联系、依恋、社交媒体使用)在促进适应中起着关键作用。相反,个人需求(如异文化压力、学业压力、群体间焦虑)和情境需求(如感知歧视、文化距离、社会文化困难)对适应结果产生负向影响。人口因素(如性别、年龄和教育水平)也与适应有关,但结果仍不一致。本综述还讨论了方法的质量评估、研究差距、局限性和影响,强调了这些发现对理解国际学生的跨文化适应的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信