Climate risk performance and tail risk contagion in energy stock markets: Evidence from China

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Xiaoyun Xing , Zihan Xu , Xiuya Wang , Kun Guo
{"title":"Climate risk performance and tail risk contagion in energy stock markets: Evidence from China","authors":"Xiaoyun Xing ,&nbsp;Zihan Xu ,&nbsp;Xiuya Wang ,&nbsp;Kun Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change has resulted in unexpected changes to the energy market. This paper constructs a GARCH-MIDAS model to examine the impact of climate risk performance on the risk contagion within and across China’s energy markets, from both perspectives of tail risk spillovers and firm-level systemic importance. Moreover, Granger causality test is employed to capture the heterogeneity with respect to region and enterprise characteristics. The results show that climate policy significantly intensifies the risk contagion effect in China’s energy markets, in which the clean energy sectors are the most susceptible. It is further found that climate concern tends to affect the spillovers ”from” and ”to” those clean energies that are currently in high demands for funding, while climate physical risk only renders significant effects on the cross-sector connectedness related to coal industry. In addition, the results of heterogeneity analysis indicate enterprises in south China are easily affected by investors’ concern about climate change, while those in east and southwest provinces are susceptible to physical risk. Also, we find that the systemic importance of state-owned enterprises are easily altered by physical risk and climate policy, while that of private firms is vulnerable to investors’ climate concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103035"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925002910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change has resulted in unexpected changes to the energy market. This paper constructs a GARCH-MIDAS model to examine the impact of climate risk performance on the risk contagion within and across China’s energy markets, from both perspectives of tail risk spillovers and firm-level systemic importance. Moreover, Granger causality test is employed to capture the heterogeneity with respect to region and enterprise characteristics. The results show that climate policy significantly intensifies the risk contagion effect in China’s energy markets, in which the clean energy sectors are the most susceptible. It is further found that climate concern tends to affect the spillovers ”from” and ”to” those clean energies that are currently in high demands for funding, while climate physical risk only renders significant effects on the cross-sector connectedness related to coal industry. In addition, the results of heterogeneity analysis indicate enterprises in south China are easily affected by investors’ concern about climate change, while those in east and southwest provinces are susceptible to physical risk. Also, we find that the systemic importance of state-owned enterprises are easily altered by physical risk and climate policy, while that of private firms is vulnerable to investors’ climate concern.
能源股票市场的气候风险表现和尾部风险传染:来自中国的证据
气候变化给能源市场带来了意想不到的变化。本文构建了GARCH-MIDAS模型,从尾部风险溢出和企业层面的系统重要性两个角度考察了气候风险绩效对中国能源市场内部和整个风险传染的影响。此外,采用格兰杰因果检验来捕捉区域和企业特征的异质性。结果表明,气候政策显著加剧了中国能源市场的风险传染效应,其中清洁能源领域最易受影响。研究进一步发现,气候担忧倾向于影响当前资金需求较高的清洁能源“从”和“到”的溢出效应,而气候物理风险仅对煤炭行业相关的跨部门连通性产生显著影响。此外,异质性分析结果表明,华南地区的企业容易受到投资者对气候变化担忧的影响,而东部和西南省份的企业容易受到实物风险的影响。此外,我们发现国有企业的系统重要性容易受到物理风险和气候政策的影响,而私营企业的系统重要性容易受到投资者气候关注的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信