“Protect the public—that's first. The second [goal] is getting the nurse to recovery”: Interviews with alternative-to-discipline program administrators
Emily Naiser , Ashley Myers , Christina Orzabal , Georges Naufal , Cindy Weston , Nancy Fahrenwald , Jane N. Bolin
{"title":"“Protect the public—that's first. The second [goal] is getting the nurse to recovery”: Interviews with alternative-to-discipline program administrators","authors":"Emily Naiser , Ashley Myers , Christina Orzabal , Georges Naufal , Cindy Weston , Nancy Fahrenwald , Jane N. Bolin","doi":"10.1016/j.jnr.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Substance use disorder (SUD) among nurses presents significant challenges for both healthcare professionals and patient safety. Rough estimates suggest that 10 % of nurses, or more than half a million nursing professionals, experience SUD in the United States. Alternative-to-discipline (ATD) programs offer a nonpunitive approach to rehabilitation for nurses while ensuring public safety.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study examines the effectiveness and functioning of ATD programs through the perspectives of state-level program administrators.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with ATD program administrators in the United States. Using a thematic analysis approach, common successes and challenges related to ATD programs were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Administrators from eight ATD programs participated in the interviews, and one submitted written responses to the interview questions. Findings revealed that functionally, ATD programs vary in the supports and restrictions given to nurses and that these decisions are primarily based on public safety. The ATD program administrators utilized the resources available to them but wished they could serve more nurses, minimize the costs to nurses, and provide additional support. While ATD programs facilitate recovery and professional reintegration, barriers such as stigma and resource limitations persist.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the need for standardized program guidelines and enhanced support structures to optimize outcomes. These insights contribute to a broader understanding of SUD intervention strategies in nursing, inform policy improvements, and identify future research directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"16 2","pages":"Pages 111-117"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825625000699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Substance use disorder (SUD) among nurses presents significant challenges for both healthcare professionals and patient safety. Rough estimates suggest that 10 % of nurses, or more than half a million nursing professionals, experience SUD in the United States. Alternative-to-discipline (ATD) programs offer a nonpunitive approach to rehabilitation for nurses while ensuring public safety.
Purpose
This study examines the effectiveness and functioning of ATD programs through the perspectives of state-level program administrators.
Methods
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with ATD program administrators in the United States. Using a thematic analysis approach, common successes and challenges related to ATD programs were identified.
Results
Administrators from eight ATD programs participated in the interviews, and one submitted written responses to the interview questions. Findings revealed that functionally, ATD programs vary in the supports and restrictions given to nurses and that these decisions are primarily based on public safety. The ATD program administrators utilized the resources available to them but wished they could serve more nurses, minimize the costs to nurses, and provide additional support. While ATD programs facilitate recovery and professional reintegration, barriers such as stigma and resource limitations persist.
Conclusions
This study highlights the need for standardized program guidelines and enhanced support structures to optimize outcomes. These insights contribute to a broader understanding of SUD intervention strategies in nursing, inform policy improvements, and identify future research directions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.