Bing Liu , Caixiang Zhang , Jidao Xie , Mingjian Gao , Shuxin Huang , Ruihan Xiong , Hao Luo
{"title":"Influence of weathering-driven mineralogical evolution on phosphorite dissolution behavior","authors":"Bing Liu , Caixiang Zhang , Jidao Xie , Mingjian Gao , Shuxin Huang , Ruihan Xiong , Hao Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The phosphorite dissolution and aqueous species release play a pivotal role in the global phosphorus (P) cycle. To elucidate differences in dissolution mechanisms between phosphorite of different weathering degrees, three phosphorite samples (with high, moderate, and low weathering degrees) were collected from field environments; then, a series of mineralogical characterizations coupled with dissolution experiments were conducted. Compared to primary phosphorite, weathered phosphorite exhibited substantial depletion of carbonate minerals, while silicate minerals and phosphate minerals were relatively enriched, and secondary minerals (e.g., FePO<sub>4</sub> and CaF<sub>2</sub>) were formed. Furthermore, the dissolution rates of phosphorite samples within a pH range of 3–7 were determined using a mixed-flow reactor. The results demonstrated a negative linear relationship between the logarithm of dissolution rate and pH (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.54–0.94). The P release rate constant (from 0.7 to 1.52 mol g<sup>−1</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>) and kinetic reaction order (from 0.58 to 0.74) of weathered phosphorite were significantly higher than those of primary phosphorite. We modeled the co-dissolution behavior of associated minerals with fluorapatite using transition state theory. Calcite exhibited the strongest inhibitory effect on fluorapatite dissolution, whereas the effects of other minerals were relatively weak. In the column leaching experiment, compared to the primary phosphorite, the elements released from weathered phosphorite were predominantly present in ionic forms with a higher migration capability. During the leaching process, phosphate minerals in phosphorite were mainly converted to Exchangeable/loosely bound P (Ex-P), Iron-bound P (Fe–P), and Calcium-bound P (Ca–P); Ca<sup>2+</sup> and CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2−</sup> were mainly converted to dolomite, and F<sup>−</sup> was mainly converted to fluorite and fluorapatite. This systematic investigation provides critical insights into weathering-driven mineralogical evolution and its mechanistic control on phosphorite dissolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 106502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292725002252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The phosphorite dissolution and aqueous species release play a pivotal role in the global phosphorus (P) cycle. To elucidate differences in dissolution mechanisms between phosphorite of different weathering degrees, three phosphorite samples (with high, moderate, and low weathering degrees) were collected from field environments; then, a series of mineralogical characterizations coupled with dissolution experiments were conducted. Compared to primary phosphorite, weathered phosphorite exhibited substantial depletion of carbonate minerals, while silicate minerals and phosphate minerals were relatively enriched, and secondary minerals (e.g., FePO4 and CaF2) were formed. Furthermore, the dissolution rates of phosphorite samples within a pH range of 3–7 were determined using a mixed-flow reactor. The results demonstrated a negative linear relationship between the logarithm of dissolution rate and pH (R2 = 0.54–0.94). The P release rate constant (from 0.7 to 1.52 mol g−1 s−1) and kinetic reaction order (from 0.58 to 0.74) of weathered phosphorite were significantly higher than those of primary phosphorite. We modeled the co-dissolution behavior of associated minerals with fluorapatite using transition state theory. Calcite exhibited the strongest inhibitory effect on fluorapatite dissolution, whereas the effects of other minerals were relatively weak. In the column leaching experiment, compared to the primary phosphorite, the elements released from weathered phosphorite were predominantly present in ionic forms with a higher migration capability. During the leaching process, phosphate minerals in phosphorite were mainly converted to Exchangeable/loosely bound P (Ex-P), Iron-bound P (Fe–P), and Calcium-bound P (Ca–P); Ca2+ and CO32− were mainly converted to dolomite, and F− was mainly converted to fluorite and fluorapatite. This systematic investigation provides critical insights into weathering-driven mineralogical evolution and its mechanistic control on phosphorite dissolution.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application.
Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.