Perception of scholarly collaboration and its influencing factors among doctoral-prepared and -preparing nurses: A regional nursing society-based survey

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jinbing Bai PhD, MSN, RN, FAAN (Associate Professor) , Rebecca Koszalinski PhD, RN, CRRN, FIEL, FARN (Associate Professor) , Yuhua Wu BSN, RN (PhD Student) , Lenora Smith PhD, FNP-BC, CRNP, CDP (Associate Professor) , Katherine R. Brooks DNP, AGPCNP-BC (PhD Student) , Theresa Garcia PhD, RN (Associate Professor)
{"title":"Perception of scholarly collaboration and its influencing factors among doctoral-prepared and -preparing nurses: A regional nursing society-based survey","authors":"Jinbing Bai PhD, MSN, RN, FAAN (Associate Professor) ,&nbsp;Rebecca Koszalinski PhD, RN, CRRN, FIEL, FARN (Associate Professor) ,&nbsp;Yuhua Wu BSN, RN (PhD Student) ,&nbsp;Lenora Smith PhD, FNP-BC, CRNP, CDP (Associate Professor) ,&nbsp;Katherine R. Brooks DNP, AGPCNP-BC (PhD Student) ,&nbsp;Theresa Garcia PhD, RN (Associate Professor)","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurses with research- and practice-focused doctorate degrees complement each other's work and contribute to the advancement of nursing profession. Understanding perceived scholarly collaboration and its influencing factors can facilitate effective teamwork, benefit the nursing profession, and improve patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the perceived scholarly collaboration and its influencing factors among nurses with or pursing doctoral degrees.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a descriptive cross-sectional design, 181 doctoral-prepared and -preparing nurses were recruited using a convenient sampling method. Participants were recruited from a nursing society-based region in the Southern United States and completed an online survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Research-focused nurses reported a higher rate of collaboration than practice-focused nurses (73.5 % versus 63.8 %). Young age and early career stage were associated with less scholarly collaboration among practice-focused nurses. Five themes were identified to improve PhD-DNP scholarly collaboration: connections; clarification; education, training, and communication; mentorship; and funding support.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results highlight the importance of considering age and career trajectory when devising strategies to enhance scholarly collaboration. More studies are needed to identify solutions (e.g. building connections, clarifying role ambiguities, and providing mentorship) to promote PhD-DNP scholarly collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722325001097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nurses with research- and practice-focused doctorate degrees complement each other's work and contribute to the advancement of nursing profession. Understanding perceived scholarly collaboration and its influencing factors can facilitate effective teamwork, benefit the nursing profession, and improve patient outcomes.

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the perceived scholarly collaboration and its influencing factors among nurses with or pursing doctoral degrees.

Methods

Using a descriptive cross-sectional design, 181 doctoral-prepared and -preparing nurses were recruited using a convenient sampling method. Participants were recruited from a nursing society-based region in the Southern United States and completed an online survey.

Results

Research-focused nurses reported a higher rate of collaboration than practice-focused nurses (73.5 % versus 63.8 %). Young age and early career stage were associated with less scholarly collaboration among practice-focused nurses. Five themes were identified to improve PhD-DNP scholarly collaboration: connections; clarification; education, training, and communication; mentorship; and funding support.

Conclusion

The results highlight the importance of considering age and career trajectory when devising strategies to enhance scholarly collaboration. More studies are needed to identify solutions (e.g. building connections, clarifying role ambiguities, and providing mentorship) to promote PhD-DNP scholarly collaboration.
专科护士与专科护士学术合作认知及其影响因素:一项基于区域护理学会的调查
拥有以研究和实践为重点的博士学位的护士相互补充,为护理职业的发展做出贡献。了解感知学术合作及其影响因素可以促进有效的团队合作,有利于护理专业,改善患者预后。目的探讨博士及在读护士对学术合作的认知及其影响因素。方法采用描述性横断面设计,采用方便抽样法对181名博士预备护士进行调查。参与者是从美国南部的一个护理协会招募的,并完成了一项在线调查。结果以研究为中心的护士报告的合作率高于以实践为中心的护士(73.5%对63.8%)。年轻的年龄和早期的职业生涯阶段与较少的学术合作,以实践为重点的护士。确定了五个主题来改善博士- dnp的学术合作:联系;澄清;教育、培训和交流;指导;以及资金支持。结论研究结果强调了在制定促进学术合作策略时考虑年龄和职业轨迹的重要性。需要更多的研究来确定解决方案(例如建立联系、澄清角色模糊和提供指导),以促进博士- dnp的学术合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信