Determinants of health shocks: A comparative analysis of communicable and non-communicable diseases severity in the Campo Ma’an National Park Communities, Cameroon
{"title":"Determinants of health shocks: A comparative analysis of communicable and non-communicable diseases severity in the Campo Ma’an National Park Communities, Cameroon","authors":"Raoul Ndikebeng Kometa , Wanie Clarkson Mvo , Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The burden of health shocks continues to pose significant threats on human wellbeing, development and livelihoods especially in sub-Saharan African countries. Evidence on its perceptions and severity on natural resource dependent communities in Cameroon are lacking. To bridge this gap, the study uses the case of the Campo Ma’an National Park to i) identify the typology of health shocks in natural resources dependent communities, ii) explore the perceptions of natural resource dependent communities on health shocks, and iii) evaluate the severity of health shocks on natural resource-based livelihoods. To attain these objectives, a survey of 200 natural resource dependent households was conducted in four zones of the Campo Ma’an National Park, complemented by expert interviews (N = 4), and key informant interviews (N = 6). The results indicate that the Campo Ma’an National Park communities are experiencing both communicable and non-communicable diseases with higher burden. Also, the perception of health shocks was more on human-induce phenomena, followed by natural induce phenomena. In addition, varied perceptions on health shock severity revealed an increase in forest, land and water resources and livelihoods during health shocks in the region, while some perceived a decline in their livelihoods over the past five years. There is a significant difference in the severity of communicable health shocks over non-communicable health shocks in Campo Ma’an National Park communities. Diseases like malaria, HIV and AIDS, tuberculosis and COVID-19 in the area around the Campo Ma’an National Park have significant effects on the livelihoods of the local communities. The study provides empirical evidence on the link between health shocks and livelihoods in natural resource settings with emphasis on the typology and severity of health shocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 127013"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125001906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The burden of health shocks continues to pose significant threats on human wellbeing, development and livelihoods especially in sub-Saharan African countries. Evidence on its perceptions and severity on natural resource dependent communities in Cameroon are lacking. To bridge this gap, the study uses the case of the Campo Ma’an National Park to i) identify the typology of health shocks in natural resources dependent communities, ii) explore the perceptions of natural resource dependent communities on health shocks, and iii) evaluate the severity of health shocks on natural resource-based livelihoods. To attain these objectives, a survey of 200 natural resource dependent households was conducted in four zones of the Campo Ma’an National Park, complemented by expert interviews (N = 4), and key informant interviews (N = 6). The results indicate that the Campo Ma’an National Park communities are experiencing both communicable and non-communicable diseases with higher burden. Also, the perception of health shocks was more on human-induce phenomena, followed by natural induce phenomena. In addition, varied perceptions on health shock severity revealed an increase in forest, land and water resources and livelihoods during health shocks in the region, while some perceived a decline in their livelihoods over the past five years. There is a significant difference in the severity of communicable health shocks over non-communicable health shocks in Campo Ma’an National Park communities. Diseases like malaria, HIV and AIDS, tuberculosis and COVID-19 in the area around the Campo Ma’an National Park have significant effects on the livelihoods of the local communities. The study provides empirical evidence on the link between health shocks and livelihoods in natural resource settings with emphasis on the typology and severity of health shocks.
健康冲击的负担继续对人类福祉、发展和生计构成重大威胁,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲国家。缺乏关于其对喀麦隆依赖自然资源的社区的看法和严重程度的证据。为了弥补这一差距,本研究以坎波马安国家公园为例,i)确定依赖自然资源的社区健康冲击的类型,ii)探索依赖自然资源的社区对健康冲击的看法,以及iii)评估健康冲击对基于自然资源的生计的严重程度。为了实现这些目标,在Campo Ma 'an国家公园的四个区域对200个依赖自然资源的家庭进行了调查,并辅以专家访谈(N = 4)和关键信息提供者访谈(N = 6)。结果表明,Campo Ma 'an国家公园社区正在经历传染病和非传染性疾病,负担较高。此外,对健康冲击的感知更多是由人为引起的现象,其次是自然引起的现象。此外,对健康冲击严重程度的不同看法表明,在健康冲击期间,该区域的森林、土地和水资源和生计有所增加,而一些人则认为他们的生计在过去五年中有所下降。在坎波马安国家公园社区,传染性健康冲击的严重程度与非传染性健康冲击的严重程度存在显著差异。坎波马安国家公园周边地区的疟疾、艾滋病毒/艾滋病、结核病和COVID-19等疾病对当地社区的生计产生了重大影响。该研究提供了关于自然资源环境中健康冲击与生计之间联系的经验证据,重点是健康冲击的类型和严重程度。
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.