Individual differences in word learning from print and digital shared book reading

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Laura Diprossimo, Kate Cain
{"title":"Individual differences in word learning from print and digital shared book reading","authors":"Laura Diprossimo,&nbsp;Kate Cain","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared book reading is an important context for children’s vocabulary development. Yet, the process by which word learning is influenced by the characteristics of both the learning material and the learner remains poorly understood – particularly in relation to contemporary digital literacy practice. We examined the effects of book format (print vs. digital) and individual differences in prior vocabulary knowledge and executive functions on children’s word learning. English-speaking caregivers and their 4- to 5-year-olds took part in this study (<em>N</em> = 99; child’s M<sub>age</sub> = 57.5 months; 57.6 % girls). In a cross-sectional, within-subjects design, dyads read one of two custom storybooks in print, and the other in digital format, with order of book and format presentation counterbalanced across participants. Word learning was assessed with tests of production, definition, and comprehension. There was no evidence of a main effect of book format across word learning measures, however, several child characteristics influenced word learning. Prior vocabulary knowledge predicted performance on all word learning measures, boys were more accurate than girls in tests of definition and comprehension, and executive functions significantly predicted performance in the definition test. In addition, there was a significant cross-over interaction between book format and executive functions for the comprehension test scores. In the digital book condition only, higher comprehension test scores were obtained by children who scored more highly on the measures of executive functions. Overall, these findings underscore the importance of considering individual differences and multiple outcomes when studying learning from different media.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 106345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096525001511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared book reading is an important context for children’s vocabulary development. Yet, the process by which word learning is influenced by the characteristics of both the learning material and the learner remains poorly understood – particularly in relation to contemporary digital literacy practice. We examined the effects of book format (print vs. digital) and individual differences in prior vocabulary knowledge and executive functions on children’s word learning. English-speaking caregivers and their 4- to 5-year-olds took part in this study (N = 99; child’s Mage = 57.5 months; 57.6 % girls). In a cross-sectional, within-subjects design, dyads read one of two custom storybooks in print, and the other in digital format, with order of book and format presentation counterbalanced across participants. Word learning was assessed with tests of production, definition, and comprehension. There was no evidence of a main effect of book format across word learning measures, however, several child characteristics influenced word learning. Prior vocabulary knowledge predicted performance on all word learning measures, boys were more accurate than girls in tests of definition and comprehension, and executive functions significantly predicted performance in the definition test. In addition, there was a significant cross-over interaction between book format and executive functions for the comprehension test scores. In the digital book condition only, higher comprehension test scores were obtained by children who scored more highly on the measures of executive functions. Overall, these findings underscore the importance of considering individual differences and multiple outcomes when studying learning from different media.
从印刷和数字共享阅读中学习单词的个体差异
共同阅读是儿童词汇发展的重要语境。然而,单词学习受到学习材料和学习者特征影响的过程仍然知之甚少,特别是在当代数字扫盲实践中。本研究考察了图书格式(印刷版与电子版)和个体差异对儿童词汇学习的影响,以及先前词汇知识和执行功能的影响。说英语的照顾者和他们4到5岁的孩子参加了这项研究(N = 99;儿童法师= 57.5个月;57.6%女孩)。在横断面的主题内设计中,二人组阅读两本定制的印刷故事书中的一本,另一本是数字格式的,书的顺序和格式呈现在参与者之间是平衡的。单词学习通过生成、定义和理解测试进行评估。没有证据表明书籍格式对单词学习有主要影响,然而,几个儿童特征影响单词学习。先前的词汇知识预测了所有单词学习测试的成绩,男孩在定义和理解测试中比女孩更准确,执行功能显著预测了定义测试的成绩。此外,书本格式与执行功能对理解测试成绩有显著的交叉交互作用。仅在电子书条件下,执行功能测试得分较高的儿童获得了更高的理解测试分数。总的来说,这些发现强调了在研究从不同媒体学习时考虑个体差异和多种结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信