The challenges of family group conferences for at-risk children: risk assessment by parents and social workers

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Yasmin Aboud-Halabi , Yan Serdtse , Orna Shemer
{"title":"The challenges of family group conferences for at-risk children: risk assessment by parents and social workers","authors":"Yasmin Aboud-Halabi ,&nbsp;Yan Serdtse ,&nbsp;Orna Shemer","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study examined the family group conference (FGC) model implemented in Israel from 2018 to 2021 as an alternative to conventional welfare services for protecting at-risk children. The model fosters deep partnerships among the family, local community, and professionals. This collaboration manifests in defining children’s concerns and creating tailored intervention plans and strategies for the family and child. The study examined the concerns of parents and social workers who participated in the FGC regarding the children and changes in their perceptions following the implementation of the model. The data was collected through closed-ended questionnaires. The findings indicate mixed outcomes regarding the change in the situation of children who participated in FGC. Differences were found in the perceptions of parents and social workers regarding risk and, as such, also in their evaluation of the achievement of goals. Parents found that achieving the goals set in the FCG reduced their children’s risk, while the social workers reported contrasting perceptions. These discrepancies highlight the challenges in implementing FGC and suggest that while the model has the potential to enhance children’s protection, further examination of FGC implementation, and particularly the professional perceptions that guide social workers in child protection, is required. The study contributes to understanding FGC as a practice promoting the protection of children and families.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925003573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study examined the family group conference (FGC) model implemented in Israel from 2018 to 2021 as an alternative to conventional welfare services for protecting at-risk children. The model fosters deep partnerships among the family, local community, and professionals. This collaboration manifests in defining children’s concerns and creating tailored intervention plans and strategies for the family and child. The study examined the concerns of parents and social workers who participated in the FGC regarding the children and changes in their perceptions following the implementation of the model. The data was collected through closed-ended questionnaires. The findings indicate mixed outcomes regarding the change in the situation of children who participated in FGC. Differences were found in the perceptions of parents and social workers regarding risk and, as such, also in their evaluation of the achievement of goals. Parents found that achieving the goals set in the FCG reduced their children’s risk, while the social workers reported contrasting perceptions. These discrepancies highlight the challenges in implementing FGC and suggest that while the model has the potential to enhance children’s protection, further examination of FGC implementation, and particularly the professional perceptions that guide social workers in child protection, is required. The study contributes to understanding FGC as a practice promoting the protection of children and families.
高危儿童家庭小组会议的挑战:父母和社会工作者的风险评估
目前的研究考察了2018年至2021年在以色列实施的家庭小组会议(FGC)模式,作为保护高危儿童的传统福利服务的替代方案。这种模式在家庭、当地社区和专业人士之间建立了深厚的伙伴关系。这种合作体现在确定儿童关注的问题,并为家庭和儿童制定量身定制的干预计划和策略。这项研究调查了参与儿童福利计划的家长和社会工作者对儿童的关注,以及他们在实施该模式后看法的变化。数据是通过封闭式问卷收集的。研究结果表明,参与FGC的儿童的情况发生了变化,结果好坏参半。父母和社会工作者对风险的看法存在差异,因此,他们对目标实现情况的评价也存在差异。父母发现,达到FCG中设定的目标可以降低孩子的风险,而社会工作者的看法却截然相反。这些差异凸显了实施儿童福利的挑战,并表明虽然该模式有可能加强对儿童的保护,但需要进一步审查儿童福利的实施,特别是指导社会工作者保护儿童的专业观念。这项研究有助于了解女性割礼是一种促进保护儿童和家庭的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信