Jinjuan Chen , Xiaorong Hou , Yalan Lv , Mimi Liu , Meijie Yang , Xiaoyu Zhou , Fei Du , Jia Yi , Lingqin Zhang , Guangying Li
{"title":"What digital competencies should medical students in China possess in the AI era?","authors":"Jinjuan Chen , Xiaorong Hou , Yalan Lv , Mimi Liu , Meijie Yang , Xiaoyu Zhou , Fei Du , Jia Yi , Lingqin Zhang , Guangying Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>With the advancement of the digital society and the extensive application of digital medical technologies, the demand for digital competencies among medical students is becoming increasingly critical. Digital competence of medical students refers to the ability of medical students to effectively select and use digital or intelligent technologies and applications to accomplish their studies, research, and future clinical practice. Currently in China, no digital competency framework for medical students has been established based on clinical practice requirements. Therefore, the study aimes to investigate digital competencies for medical students and provide recommendations for future digital competency training initiatives and framework development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Focusing on competency theory, we reviewed and analyzed literature related to digital competency. Twenty experts participated in a two-round Delphi method to iteratively refine and correct the indicator items. Finally, the weights of indicators were calculated through the Analytic Hierarchy Process.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty experts were invited to participate in two rounds of the Delphi survey, achievinga 100 % response rate in both rounds, with Expert Authority Coefficients of 0.81 and 0.82, indicating the credibility and professional expertise the panelists. Furthermore, Kendall’s consistency coefficient (Kendall’s W) ranged from 0.143 to 0.275 (p < 0.05), indicating that experts reached a consensus on the indicators. The final framework comprises 3 domains, 9 primary indicators, and 27 secondary indicators.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A digital competency framework for medical students was developed using the Delphi method. This framework facilitates the self-development of medical students and serves as a reference for the development of digital medical curricula.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 106043"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625002606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
With the advancement of the digital society and the extensive application of digital medical technologies, the demand for digital competencies among medical students is becoming increasingly critical. Digital competence of medical students refers to the ability of medical students to effectively select and use digital or intelligent technologies and applications to accomplish their studies, research, and future clinical practice. Currently in China, no digital competency framework for medical students has been established based on clinical practice requirements. Therefore, the study aimes to investigate digital competencies for medical students and provide recommendations for future digital competency training initiatives and framework development.
Methods
Focusing on competency theory, we reviewed and analyzed literature related to digital competency. Twenty experts participated in a two-round Delphi method to iteratively refine and correct the indicator items. Finally, the weights of indicators were calculated through the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Results
Twenty experts were invited to participate in two rounds of the Delphi survey, achievinga 100 % response rate in both rounds, with Expert Authority Coefficients of 0.81 and 0.82, indicating the credibility and professional expertise the panelists. Furthermore, Kendall’s consistency coefficient (Kendall’s W) ranged from 0.143 to 0.275 (p < 0.05), indicating that experts reached a consensus on the indicators. The final framework comprises 3 domains, 9 primary indicators, and 27 secondary indicators.
Conclusions
A digital competency framework for medical students was developed using the Delphi method. This framework facilitates the self-development of medical students and serves as a reference for the development of digital medical curricula.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings.
The scope of journal covers:
Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.;
Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc.
Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general;
Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.