EFL learners’ perceptual perezhivaniya and actual writing revision behaviors mediated by GenAI: A sociocultural theory perspective

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lili Qin , Jingjing Dong
{"title":"EFL learners’ perceptual perezhivaniya and actual writing revision behaviors mediated by GenAI: A sociocultural theory perspective","authors":"Lili Qin ,&nbsp;Jingjing Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has gained prominence as a valuable tool in enhancing EFL learners’ experiences in Second Language Acquisition (SLA). However, empirical studies specifically investigating on GenAI’s role in mediating the revision stage of EFL learners’ L2 writing processes remain scarce. Notably, research exploring the connection between learners’ perceived <em>perezhivaniya</em>—derived from Vygotskyan theory, denoting an individual’<sub>’</sub>s subjective lived experiences—and their actual revision behaviors is particularly limited. To address this lacuna, we employed interviews, Q-methodology, and the <em>Translog</em> screen recording tool to investigate the revision processes of nineteen EFL learners at a university in Southern China as they revised L2 continuation writing tasks using GenAI. A key contribution of this study is the development of a novel seven-dimensional L2 writing revision taxonomy (word choice, content, discourse, syntax, errors, alignment, and typographic elements), which guided both the Q-questionnaire design and the <em>Translog</em> data coding. This framework uniquely facilitated a comparison between perceived <em>perezhivaniya</em> and actual revision behaviors by integrating online revision with offline reflective perceptions, thereby capturing an essential dynamic aspect of the concept of <em>perezhivanie</em>. Results indicated a strong consistency between most of the learners’ perceived experiences and their actual revision behaviors, in <strong>content</strong>, <strong>alignment</strong>, and <strong>typographic</strong> elements. However, for some learners, <strong>alignment</strong>—vital for continuation writing—was frequently overlooked despite its perceptual recognition, highlighting significant pedagogical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103769"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has gained prominence as a valuable tool in enhancing EFL learners’ experiences in Second Language Acquisition (SLA). However, empirical studies specifically investigating on GenAI’s role in mediating the revision stage of EFL learners’ L2 writing processes remain scarce. Notably, research exploring the connection between learners’ perceived perezhivaniya—derived from Vygotskyan theory, denoting an individual’s subjective lived experiences—and their actual revision behaviors is particularly limited. To address this lacuna, we employed interviews, Q-methodology, and the Translog screen recording tool to investigate the revision processes of nineteen EFL learners at a university in Southern China as they revised L2 continuation writing tasks using GenAI. A key contribution of this study is the development of a novel seven-dimensional L2 writing revision taxonomy (word choice, content, discourse, syntax, errors, alignment, and typographic elements), which guided both the Q-questionnaire design and the Translog data coding. This framework uniquely facilitated a comparison between perceived perezhivaniya and actual revision behaviors by integrating online revision with offline reflective perceptions, thereby capturing an essential dynamic aspect of the concept of perezhivanie. Results indicated a strong consistency between most of the learners’ perceived experiences and their actual revision behaviors, in content, alignment, and typographic elements. However, for some learners, alignment—vital for continuation writing—was frequently overlooked despite its perceptual recognition, highlighting significant pedagogical implications.
GenAI介导的英语学习者的感知偏差和实际写作修改行为:一个社会文化理论视角
近年来,生成式人工智能(GenAI)作为提高英语学习者第二语言习得体验的重要工具而受到重视。然而,专门调查GenAI在英语学习者第二语言写作过程的修正阶段中的中介作用的实证研究仍然很少。值得注意的是,关于学习者感知的“主观生活经验”(源自维果茨基理论,指个人的主观生活经验)与他们实际的复习行为之间关系的研究尤其有限。为了解决这一空白,我们采用访谈、q -方法论和Translog屏幕记录工具来调查中国南方一所大学的19名英语学习者在使用GenAI修改第二语言续篇写作任务时的复习过程。本研究的一个关键贡献是开发了一种新颖的七维二语写作修订分类法(词汇选择、内容、话语、句法、错误、对齐和排版元素),该分类法指导了q -问卷设计和Translog数据编码。该框架通过整合在线复习和离线反思感知,独特地促进了感知到的复习行为和实际复习行为之间的比较,从而捕获了复习概念的基本动态方面。结果表明,在内容、对齐和排版元素方面,大多数学习者的感知体验与他们的实际修改行为之间存在很强的一致性。然而,对于一些学习者来说,对齐-对继续写作至关重要-经常被忽视,尽管它具有感性认识,突出了重要的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信