Monte Carlo Dose Estimation of Absorbed Dose to the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Layer of the Bone Marrow Assuming Nonuniform Distribution Around the Vascular Endothelium of the Bone Marrow: Simulation and Analysis Study.

JMIRx med Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI:10.2196/68029
Noriko Kobayashi
{"title":"Monte Carlo Dose Estimation of Absorbed Dose to the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Layer of the Bone Marrow Assuming Nonuniform Distribution Around the Vascular Endothelium of the Bone Marrow: Simulation and Analysis Study.","authors":"Noriko Kobayashi","doi":"10.2196/68029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies have shown that hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are concentrated around the endothelium of the sinusoidal capillaries. However, the current dosimetry model proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) does not account for the heterogeneity of bone marrow tissue and stem cell distribution. If the location of the hematopoietic stem cell layer differs from previous assumptions, it is necessary to re-evaluate the dose. It is especially important for short-range alpha particles where the energy deposited in the target HSC layer can vary greatly depending on the distance from the source region.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the red bone marrow doses assuming that the hematopoietic stem cell layer of the bone marrow is localized in the vascular endothelium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model of the trabecular bone tissues in the cervical vertebrae was developed using the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport System code. Radiation transport simulations were performed for beta and alpha radionuclides as well as noble gases, and the absorbed doses to the stem cell layer within the perivascular HSC layer of the bone marrow from inhaled radionuclides were estimated. The estimated doses were then compared with the absorbed dose based on the ICRP 60 and ICRP 103 recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absorbed doses to the bone marrow obtained from the model calculations were not significantly different from ICRP 60 and ICRP 103 for beta-nuclides. However, for alpha-nuclides, the absorbed doses were much lower than previously estimated. In addition, the contribution of red bone marrow and blood sources was greater than that of trabecular bone for alpha-nuclides. Noble gases in the red bone marrow may also affect the bone marrow stem cell layer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bone marrow dose assessment for alpha nuclides and noble gases should be re-examined using a precise model based on computed tomography images from the perspective of occupational and public radiation protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":73558,"journal":{"name":"JMIRx med","volume":"6 ","pages":"e68029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIRx med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown that hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are concentrated around the endothelium of the sinusoidal capillaries. However, the current dosimetry model proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) does not account for the heterogeneity of bone marrow tissue and stem cell distribution. If the location of the hematopoietic stem cell layer differs from previous assumptions, it is necessary to re-evaluate the dose. It is especially important for short-range alpha particles where the energy deposited in the target HSC layer can vary greatly depending on the distance from the source region.

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the red bone marrow doses assuming that the hematopoietic stem cell layer of the bone marrow is localized in the vascular endothelium.

Methods: A model of the trabecular bone tissues in the cervical vertebrae was developed using the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport System code. Radiation transport simulations were performed for beta and alpha radionuclides as well as noble gases, and the absorbed doses to the stem cell layer within the perivascular HSC layer of the bone marrow from inhaled radionuclides were estimated. The estimated doses were then compared with the absorbed dose based on the ICRP 60 and ICRP 103 recommendations.

Results: The absorbed doses to the bone marrow obtained from the model calculations were not significantly different from ICRP 60 and ICRP 103 for beta-nuclides. However, for alpha-nuclides, the absorbed doses were much lower than previously estimated. In addition, the contribution of red bone marrow and blood sources was greater than that of trabecular bone for alpha-nuclides. Noble gases in the red bone marrow may also affect the bone marrow stem cell layer.

Conclusions: The bone marrow dose assessment for alpha nuclides and noble gases should be re-examined using a precise model based on computed tomography images from the perspective of occupational and public radiation protection.

假设骨髓血管内皮周围非均匀分布的骨髓造血干细胞层吸收剂量的蒙特卡罗剂量估计:模拟与分析研究。
背景:近年来的研究表明,造血干细胞(hsc)主要集中在窦状毛细血管内皮周围。然而,目前由国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)提出的剂量学模型并没有考虑到骨髓组织和干细胞分布的异质性。如果造血干细胞层的位置与先前的假设不同,则需要重新评估剂量。这对于短程α粒子尤其重要,其中沉积在目标HSC层中的能量可以根据与源区域的距离而发生很大变化。目的:本研究的目的是评估假设骨髓造血干细胞层定位于血管内皮的红骨髓剂量。方法:利用粒子和重离子传输系统代码建立颈椎骨小梁骨组织模型。对β和α放射性核素以及惰性气体进行了辐射输运模拟,并估计了吸入放射性核素对骨髓血管周围HSC层内干细胞层的吸收剂量。然后将估计剂量与ICRP 60和ICRP 103建议的吸收剂量进行比较。结果:模型计算得到的β -核素对骨髓的吸收剂量与ICRP 60和ICRP 103无显著差异。然而,对于α -核素,吸收剂量远低于先前的估计。此外,红骨髓和血源对α -核素的贡献大于骨小梁。红色骨髓中的惰性气体也可能影响骨髓干细胞层。结论:应从职业和公共辐射防护的角度出发,采用基于计算机断层扫描图像的精确模型重新评估α -核素和惰性气体的骨髓剂量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信