Emergency Preparedness and Factors Influencing Decision-Making in a Sample of Public K-12 Schools During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laima Licitis, India Rose, Zachary Oberholtzer, Colleen Murray, Catherine N Rasberry, Lisa C Barrios, Sanjana Pampati
{"title":"Emergency Preparedness and Factors Influencing Decision-Making in a Sample of Public K-12 Schools During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Laima Licitis, India Rose, Zachary Oberholtzer, Colleen Murray, Catherine N Rasberry, Lisa C Barrios, Sanjana Pampati","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2025.10102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate factors influencing the decision-making processes of school administrators and investigate the existence and use of emergency operations plans (EOPs) during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using survey data representative of US K-12 public schools in 2022, the prevalence of 16 factors that influenced reporting school administrators' COVID-19 prevention strategy implementation decision-making (Wave 4; <i>N</i> = 399) and the presence and use of school EOPs (Wave 5; <i>N</i> = 400) are presented overall and by urban-rural classification, poverty level, and school level. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of school administrators and used thematic analysis to understand factors influencing implementation of prevention strategies and emergency preparedness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>School district requirements or recommendations (81.6%) was the top reported factor influencing decisions on the use of COVID-19 prevention strategies. Although most schools created or updated their EOP during the 2021/2022 school year (78.1%), only 26.7% implemented or exercised an EOP during the COVID-19 pandemic. Themes from qualitative analysis focused on factors influencing the implementation of prevention strategies, limitations of current EOPs, and importance of continuous investment in school preparedness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Investing in actions to improve schools' capacity to respond to emergencies such as developing comprehensive EOPs, building partnerships, and defining roles and responsibilities is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":"19 ","pages":"e194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.10102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate factors influencing the decision-making processes of school administrators and investigate the existence and use of emergency operations plans (EOPs) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Using survey data representative of US K-12 public schools in 2022, the prevalence of 16 factors that influenced reporting school administrators' COVID-19 prevention strategy implementation decision-making (Wave 4; N = 399) and the presence and use of school EOPs (Wave 5; N = 400) are presented overall and by urban-rural classification, poverty level, and school level. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of school administrators and used thematic analysis to understand factors influencing implementation of prevention strategies and emergency preparedness.

Results: School district requirements or recommendations (81.6%) was the top reported factor influencing decisions on the use of COVID-19 prevention strategies. Although most schools created or updated their EOP during the 2021/2022 school year (78.1%), only 26.7% implemented or exercised an EOP during the COVID-19 pandemic. Themes from qualitative analysis focused on factors influencing the implementation of prevention strategies, limitations of current EOPs, and importance of continuous investment in school preparedness.

Conclusions: Investing in actions to improve schools' capacity to respond to emergencies such as developing comprehensive EOPs, building partnerships, and defining roles and responsibilities is important.

COVID-19大流行期间公立K-12学校样本的应急准备和影响决策的因素:一项混合方法研究
目的:评估影响学校管理者决策过程的因素,调查2019冠状病毒病大流行期间应急行动计划(EOPs)的存在和使用情况。方法:利用具有代表性的2022年美国K-12公立学校的调查数据,分析16个影响报告学校管理人员COVID-19预防策略实施决策的因素的流行情况(Wave 4;N = 399)和学校eop的存在和使用(第5波;N = 400)总体呈现,并按城乡分类、贫困水平和学校水平呈现。对一部分学校管理人员进行了定性访谈,并使用专题分析来了解影响实施预防战略和应急准备的因素。结果:学区要求或建议(81.6%)是影响使用COVID-19预防策略决策的首要因素。尽管大多数学校(78.1%)在2021/2022学年建立或更新了EOP,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,只有26.7%的学校实施或实施了EOP。定性分析的主题侧重于影响预防战略实施的因素、当前EOPs的局限性以及持续投资于学校防备的重要性。结论:投资行动以提高学校应对突发事件的能力非常重要,如制定全面的EOPs、建立伙伴关系、明确角色和责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信