{"title":"The hidden toll: psychological and physical consequences of providing informal care to adults in China.","authors":"Lu Zhang, Hai Gu, Yun Kou, Jinghong Gu","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid population ageing and insufficient formal care have led over 80% of Chinese older adults to rely on informal care. Yet, research on caregivers' health costs in developing countries remains scarce and inconclusive. This study aims to assess the relationship between informal caregiving and caregivers' multidimensional health and identify the vulnerable groups. Utilizing data from the Harmonized CHARLS, which includes 16 287 participants from 28 Chinese provinces, we assessed psychological health via the CES-D10 scale and physical health by chronic disease count. Ordinary least squares evaluated the association between informal caregiving and psychological health, and Zero-inflated Poisson regression examined the relationship with physical health. We also applied propensity score matching and placebo tests to mitigate potential endogeneity. Our findings reveal that informal caregivers have significantly higher CES-D10 scores [b = 0.859, SE = 0.339, P = 0.011, confidence interval (CI) (0.194, 1.525)] and a greater likelihood of chronic diseases [odds ratio (OR) = 1.213, SE = 0.039, P < 0.001, CI (1.117, 1.269)] compared with non-caregivers. The negative health effects are especially pronounced among women, rural hukou holders, and the employed. Our study argues that policies should prioritize the health deterioration of informal caregivers over their cost-effectiveness, particularly among vulnerable groups. It calls for adequate support for informal caregivers, including gender-sensitive subsidies for female caregivers, improved primary healthcare for rural caregivers, and flexible working arrangements for employed caregivers to reduce their burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rapid population ageing and insufficient formal care have led over 80% of Chinese older adults to rely on informal care. Yet, research on caregivers' health costs in developing countries remains scarce and inconclusive. This study aims to assess the relationship between informal caregiving and caregivers' multidimensional health and identify the vulnerable groups. Utilizing data from the Harmonized CHARLS, which includes 16 287 participants from 28 Chinese provinces, we assessed psychological health via the CES-D10 scale and physical health by chronic disease count. Ordinary least squares evaluated the association between informal caregiving and psychological health, and Zero-inflated Poisson regression examined the relationship with physical health. We also applied propensity score matching and placebo tests to mitigate potential endogeneity. Our findings reveal that informal caregivers have significantly higher CES-D10 scores [b = 0.859, SE = 0.339, P = 0.011, confidence interval (CI) (0.194, 1.525)] and a greater likelihood of chronic diseases [odds ratio (OR) = 1.213, SE = 0.039, P < 0.001, CI (1.117, 1.269)] compared with non-caregivers. The negative health effects are especially pronounced among women, rural hukou holders, and the employed. Our study argues that policies should prioritize the health deterioration of informal caregivers over their cost-effectiveness, particularly among vulnerable groups. It calls for adequate support for informal caregivers, including gender-sensitive subsidies for female caregivers, improved primary healthcare for rural caregivers, and flexible working arrangements for employed caregivers to reduce their burdens.
人口老龄化迅速,正规护理不足,导致中国80%以上的老年人依赖于非正规护理。然而,对发展中国家护理人员卫生费用的研究仍然很少,而且没有定论。本研究旨在评估非正式照护与照护者多维健康的关系,并识别弱势群体。利用来自中国28个省份的16287名参与者的CHARLS数据,我们通过CES-D10量表评估心理健康状况,通过慢性病计数评估身体健康状况。普通最小二乘法评估非正式照顾与心理健康的关系,零膨胀泊松回归检验与身体健康的关系。我们还应用倾向评分匹配和安慰剂测试来减轻潜在的内生性。我们的研究结果显示,与非护理人员相比,非正式护理人员的CES-D10得分显著高于非护理人员[b = 0.859, SE = 0.339, P = 0.011,可信区间(CI)(0.194, 1.525)],患慢性病的可能性更高[优势比(OR) = 1.213, SE = 0.039, P < 0.001, CI(1.117, 1.269)]。对健康的负面影响在妇女、农村户口持有者和就业人员中尤为明显。我们的研究认为,政策应该优先考虑非正式照顾者的健康恶化,而不是其成本效益,特别是在弱势群体中。它呼吁为非正规护理人员提供充分支持,包括对女性护理人员提供性别敏感的补贴,改善农村护理人员的初级保健,并为受雇护理人员提供灵活的工作安排,以减轻其负担。
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.