Simona Stefan, Paula Stroian, Liviu-Andrei Fodor, Matu Silviu, Diana Nechita, Daniel Mătiță, Mircea Mustățea, Alice Ioana, Ancuta Tamas, Eckhard Roediger
{"title":"Contextual schema therapy for social anxiety and depression symptoms-A two sessions, online, group randomized trial.","authors":"Simona Stefan, Paula Stroian, Liviu-Andrei Fodor, Matu Silviu, Diana Nechita, Daniel Mătiță, Mircea Mustățea, Alice Ioana, Ancuta Tamas, Eckhard Roediger","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2523480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the current randomized control trial, we tested the efficacy of a transdiagnostic, two-session Contextual Schema Therapy intervention, delivered in an online group format, for individuals with social anxiety and/or depressive symptoms and examined self-criticism and experiential avoidance as potential mediators.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample included 134 participants scoring above the 30 Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale cut-off point and/or above 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory-II, who were randomized to either the contextual schema therapy group intervention or an online psychoeducation control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant reductions in social anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.038, d = 0.35 at post-intervention) and depression (<i>p</i> = 0.015, d = 0.41 at post-intervention) and an increase in quality of life (<i>p</i> = 0.033, d = 0.36 at follow-up) were found in the contextual schema therapy group compared to the control group (in the absence of clustering effects), while no significant differences were found for self-criticism and experiential avoidance, the proposed mediators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results support the efficacy of this brief contextual schema intervention format, while its mechanisms of change remain to be investigated further.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2523480","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In the current randomized control trial, we tested the efficacy of a transdiagnostic, two-session Contextual Schema Therapy intervention, delivered in an online group format, for individuals with social anxiety and/or depressive symptoms and examined self-criticism and experiential avoidance as potential mediators.
Method: The sample included 134 participants scoring above the 30 Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale cut-off point and/or above 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory-II, who were randomized to either the contextual schema therapy group intervention or an online psychoeducation control group.
Results: Significant reductions in social anxiety (p = 0.038, d = 0.35 at post-intervention) and depression (p = 0.015, d = 0.41 at post-intervention) and an increase in quality of life (p = 0.033, d = 0.36 at follow-up) were found in the contextual schema therapy group compared to the control group (in the absence of clustering effects), while no significant differences were found for self-criticism and experiential avoidance, the proposed mediators.
Conclusions: The results support the efficacy of this brief contextual schema intervention format, while its mechanisms of change remain to be investigated further.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.