Occupational Therapists' Use of Interpretative Description: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Ema Tokolahi, Elizabeth Martin, Helen Jeffery, Rita Robinson, Heidi Cathcart, Sian Griffiths
{"title":"Occupational Therapists' Use of Interpretative Description: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ema Tokolahi, Elizabeth Martin, Helen Jeffery, Rita Robinson, Heidi Cathcart, Sian Griffiths","doi":"10.1177/15394492251353566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interpretive description is a qualitative research methodology. The aim of this study was to map the use of interpretive description in occupational therapy research and understand its implementation. Peer-reviewed studies were located from Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre (ANZRC), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Proquest, Pubmed, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies focused on occupational therapy/science research, by occupational therapists, using interpretive description. Data extracted were location, research question/aim, methods, explicit use of credibility criteria, explicit disciplinary positioning, authors' and participants' ethnicities stated, and number of citations. Forty-two articles were included, published between 2014 and 2023. Use of interpretive description has steadily increased, most commonly using semi-structured interviews, exploring peoples' experiences to inform and influence practice. Reported positioning of the researcher(s) in terms of reflexivity, culture, and disciplinary perspective was limited. Occupational therapy researchers using interpretive description should position themselves in terms of discipline, culture, and theoretical lens effectively, adhere to credibility criteria and utilize opportunities for diverse data collection methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":" ","pages":"15394492251353566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492251353566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpretive description is a qualitative research methodology. The aim of this study was to map the use of interpretive description in occupational therapy research and understand its implementation. Peer-reviewed studies were located from Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre (ANZRC), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Proquest, Pubmed, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies focused on occupational therapy/science research, by occupational therapists, using interpretive description. Data extracted were location, research question/aim, methods, explicit use of credibility criteria, explicit disciplinary positioning, authors' and participants' ethnicities stated, and number of citations. Forty-two articles were included, published between 2014 and 2023. Use of interpretive description has steadily increased, most commonly using semi-structured interviews, exploring peoples' experiences to inform and influence practice. Reported positioning of the researcher(s) in terms of reflexivity, culture, and disciplinary perspective was limited. Occupational therapy researchers using interpretive description should position themselves in terms of discipline, culture, and theoretical lens effectively, adhere to credibility criteria and utilize opportunities for diverse data collection methods.

职业治疗师对解释性描述的使用:范围回顾。
解释性描述是一种定性研究方法。本研究的目的是绘制解释性描述在职业治疗研究中的使用,并了解其实施情况。同行评议的研究来自澳大利亚/新西兰参考中心(ANZRC)、护理和相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Medline、Proquest、Pubmed和谷歌Scholar。合格的研究集中于职业治疗/科学研究,由职业治疗师使用解释性描述。提取的数据包括地点、研究问题/目的、方法、明确使用的可信度标准、明确的学科定位、作者和参与者所陈述的种族以及引用次数。纳入了2014年至2023年间发表的42篇文章。解释性描述的使用稳步增加,最常见的是使用半结构化访谈,探索人们的经验,以告知和影响实践。据报道,研究人员在反身性、文化和学科视角方面的定位是有限的。使用解释性描述的职业治疗研究人员应该有效地从学科、文化和理论的角度来定位自己,坚持可信度标准,并利用各种数据收集方法的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信