Ethical-legal implications of AI-powered healthcare in critical perspective.

IF 4.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2025.1619463
Mohammad Nasir, Kaif Siddiqui, Samreen Ahmed
{"title":"Ethical-legal implications of AI-powered healthcare in critical perspective.","authors":"Mohammad Nasir, Kaif Siddiqui, Samreen Ahmed","doi":"10.3389/frai.2025.1619463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in the field of healthcare, from diagnosis to medical decision making and patient care, necessitates identification of its potential benefits, risks and challenges. This requires an appraisal of AI use from a legal and ethical perspective. A review of the existing literature on AI in healthcare available on PubMed, Oxford Academic and Scopus revealed several common concerns regarding the relationship between AI, ethics, and healthcare-(i) the question of data: the choices inherent in collection, analysis, interpretation, and deployment of data inputted to and outputted by AI systems; (ii) the challenges to traditional patient-doctor relationships and long-held assumptions about privacy, identity and autonomy, as well as to the functioning of healthcare institutions. The potential benefits of AI's application need to be balanced against the legal-ethical issues emanating from its use-bias, consent, access, privacy and cost-to guard against detrimental effects of uncritical AI use. The authors suggest that a legal framework for AI should adopt a critical and grounded perspective-cognizant of the material political realities of AI and its wider impact on more marginalized communities. The largescale utilization of health datasets often without consent, responsibility or accountability, further necessitates regulation in the field of technology design, given the entwined nature of AI research with advancements in wearables and sensor technology. Taking into account the 'superhuman' and 'subhuman' traits of AI, regulation should aim to encourage the development of AI systems that augment rather than outrightly replace human effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"1619463"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1619463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in the field of healthcare, from diagnosis to medical decision making and patient care, necessitates identification of its potential benefits, risks and challenges. This requires an appraisal of AI use from a legal and ethical perspective. A review of the existing literature on AI in healthcare available on PubMed, Oxford Academic and Scopus revealed several common concerns regarding the relationship between AI, ethics, and healthcare-(i) the question of data: the choices inherent in collection, analysis, interpretation, and deployment of data inputted to and outputted by AI systems; (ii) the challenges to traditional patient-doctor relationships and long-held assumptions about privacy, identity and autonomy, as well as to the functioning of healthcare institutions. The potential benefits of AI's application need to be balanced against the legal-ethical issues emanating from its use-bias, consent, access, privacy and cost-to guard against detrimental effects of uncritical AI use. The authors suggest that a legal framework for AI should adopt a critical and grounded perspective-cognizant of the material political realities of AI and its wider impact on more marginalized communities. The largescale utilization of health datasets often without consent, responsibility or accountability, further necessitates regulation in the field of technology design, given the entwined nature of AI research with advancements in wearables and sensor technology. Taking into account the 'superhuman' and 'subhuman' traits of AI, regulation should aim to encourage the development of AI systems that augment rather than outrightly replace human effort.

批判视角下人工智能医疗的伦理-法律影响。
人工智能(AI)系统在医疗保健领域的应用越来越多,从诊断到医疗决策和患者护理,需要识别其潜在的好处、风险和挑战。这需要从法律和伦理的角度对人工智能的使用进行评估。通过对PubMed、Oxford Academic和Scopus上现有的关于人工智能在医疗保健领域的文献的回顾,揭示了关于人工智能、伦理和医疗保健之间关系的几个常见问题——(i)数据问题:人工智能系统输入和输出数据的收集、分析、解释和部署中固有的选择;(二)对传统医患关系和长期以来关于隐私、身份和自主权的假设的挑战,以及对医疗机构运作的挑战。人工智能应用的潜在好处需要与使用偏见、同意、访问、隐私和成本产生的法律伦理问题相平衡,以防止不加批判地使用人工智能的有害影响。作者建议,人工智能的法律框架应该采用一种批判性的、有根据的视角——认识到人工智能的物质政治现实及其对更边缘化社区的更广泛影响。鉴于人工智能研究与可穿戴设备和传感器技术的进步相互交织的性质,卫生数据集的大规模使用往往未经同意、没有责任或问责,因此进一步需要对技术设计领域进行监管。考虑到人工智能的“超人”和“次人类”特征,监管的目标应该是鼓励人工智能系统的发展,这些系统可以增强而不是完全取代人类的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信