On the viability of higher-order theories.

IF 4.3 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Stefano Ansoldi, Aaron Collavini
{"title":"On the viability of higher-order theories.","authors":"Stefano Ansoldi, Aaron Collavini","doi":"10.1098/rsta.2023.0286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In physics, all dynamical equations that describe fundamental interactions are second-order differential equations in the time derivatives. In the literature, this property is traced back to a result obtained by Ostrogradski in the mid-nineteenth century, which is the technical basis of a <i>no-go</i> theorem for higher-order theories. In this work, we review the connection of symmetry properties with the order of dynamical equations, before reconsidering Ostrogradski's result. Then, we show how Ostrogradski's conclusion is reached by applying to higher-order theories concepts and methods that have been specifically developed for second-order theories. We discuss a potential lack of consistency in this approach, to support the claim that Ostrogradski's result applies to a class of higher-order theories that is nowhere representative of generic ones: we support this claim by giving an example of a higher-order Lagrangian that is asymptotically stable, but that would be unstable under Ostrogradski's criterion. We also conclude that, when considering higher-order theories as fundamental, we may need to reconsider and extend the conceptual framework on which our standard treatment of second-order theories is based.This article is part of the theme issue 'Newton, Principia, Newton Geneva Edition (17th-19th) and modern Newtonian mechanics: heritage, past & present'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19879,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences","volume":"383 2301","pages":"20230286"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In physics, all dynamical equations that describe fundamental interactions are second-order differential equations in the time derivatives. In the literature, this property is traced back to a result obtained by Ostrogradski in the mid-nineteenth century, which is the technical basis of a no-go theorem for higher-order theories. In this work, we review the connection of symmetry properties with the order of dynamical equations, before reconsidering Ostrogradski's result. Then, we show how Ostrogradski's conclusion is reached by applying to higher-order theories concepts and methods that have been specifically developed for second-order theories. We discuss a potential lack of consistency in this approach, to support the claim that Ostrogradski's result applies to a class of higher-order theories that is nowhere representative of generic ones: we support this claim by giving an example of a higher-order Lagrangian that is asymptotically stable, but that would be unstable under Ostrogradski's criterion. We also conclude that, when considering higher-order theories as fundamental, we may need to reconsider and extend the conceptual framework on which our standard treatment of second-order theories is based.This article is part of the theme issue 'Newton, Principia, Newton Geneva Edition (17th-19th) and modern Newtonian mechanics: heritage, past & present'.

关于高阶理论的可行性。
在物理学中,所有描述基本相互作用的动力学方程都是时间导数的二阶微分方程。在文献中,这一性质可以追溯到Ostrogradski在19世纪中期得到的一个结果,这个结果是高阶理论的no-go定理的技术基础。在本文中,我们在重新考虑Ostrogradski的结果之前,回顾了对称性质与动力学方程阶的联系。然后,我们展示了Ostrogradski的结论是如何通过将专门为二阶理论开发的概念和方法应用于高阶理论而得出的。我们讨论了这种方法中潜在的缺乏一致性,以支持Ostrogradski的结果适用于一类不能代表一般理论的高阶理论的主张:我们通过给出一个高阶拉格朗日渐近稳定的例子来支持这一主张,但它在Ostrogradski的准则下是不稳定的。我们还得出结论,当将高阶理论视为基本理论时,我们可能需要重新考虑并扩展我们对二阶理论的标准处理所基于的概念框架。本文是主题问题“牛顿,原理,牛顿日内瓦版(17 -19)和现代牛顿力学:遗产,过去和现在”的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Continuing its long history of influential scientific publishing, Philosophical Transactions A publishes high-quality theme issues on topics of current importance and general interest within the physical, mathematical and engineering sciences, guest-edited by leading authorities and comprising new research, reviews and opinions from prominent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信