Supporting Pharmacists with Legislative Changes: Pharmacist Knowledge and Comfort with Contraception Prescribing.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Emily J Zielinski, Todd A Walroth, Kala L Sanders, Christopher J Wickesberg, Todd Bailey Cox, Rajarpreet Sandhu, Charity Cicak, Ashley H Meredith
{"title":"Supporting Pharmacists with Legislative Changes: Pharmacist Knowledge and Comfort with Contraception Prescribing.","authors":"Emily J Zielinski, Todd A Walroth, Kala L Sanders, Christopher J Wickesberg, Todd Bailey Cox, Rajarpreet Sandhu, Charity Cicak, Ashley H Meredith","doi":"10.1177/08971900251356350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDue to contraceptive access scarcity and other variables, the U.S. exhibits high rates of unintended pregnancy, and Healthy People 2030 has a goal to address this through increased use of birth control. In 2023, Indiana passed legislation allowing pharmacists to prescribe self-administered contraception. Uptake of pharmacist contraceptive prescribing has been limited, and many states are not utilizing this opportunity to advance reproductive equity. We aimed to address significant gaps in literature assessing pharmacists' comfortability and knowledge regarding the implementation and utilization of this protocol.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacists' comfort and knowledge level before and after a formal education program on conducting contraceptive care via a pharmacist-driven protocol.MethodsThis was a retrospective, cohort study conducted at a safety-net, academic medical center in Indianapolis, Indiana. A formal education program with associated pharmacist surveys took place over two training sessions in November and December 2023.ResultsA total of 30 paired pre- and post-pharmacist surveys were included in analysis (63% response rate). The median [IQR] composite score (knowledge and comfort level) increased pre- vs post-survey from 38 [34,57] to 86 [81,91] (<i>P</i> < .001). Overall correct median [IQR] knowledge scores increased from 40% [40,50] to 70% [60,80] (<i>P</i> < .001). Overall median [IQR] comfort level scores increased from 36% [27,68] to 95% [86 100] (<i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionFollowing completion of a formal education program, pharmacists demonstrated an increase in knowledge and comfort level with prescribing contraception. Intentional training opportunities should be provided to pharmacists prior to implementation. Other health-systems could benefit from offering a similar program.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900251356350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251356350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDue to contraceptive access scarcity and other variables, the U.S. exhibits high rates of unintended pregnancy, and Healthy People 2030 has a goal to address this through increased use of birth control. In 2023, Indiana passed legislation allowing pharmacists to prescribe self-administered contraception. Uptake of pharmacist contraceptive prescribing has been limited, and many states are not utilizing this opportunity to advance reproductive equity. We aimed to address significant gaps in literature assessing pharmacists' comfortability and knowledge regarding the implementation and utilization of this protocol.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacists' comfort and knowledge level before and after a formal education program on conducting contraceptive care via a pharmacist-driven protocol.MethodsThis was a retrospective, cohort study conducted at a safety-net, academic medical center in Indianapolis, Indiana. A formal education program with associated pharmacist surveys took place over two training sessions in November and December 2023.ResultsA total of 30 paired pre- and post-pharmacist surveys were included in analysis (63% response rate). The median [IQR] composite score (knowledge and comfort level) increased pre- vs post-survey from 38 [34,57] to 86 [81,91] (P < .001). Overall correct median [IQR] knowledge scores increased from 40% [40,50] to 70% [60,80] (P < .001). Overall median [IQR] comfort level scores increased from 36% [27,68] to 95% [86 100] (P < .001).ConclusionFollowing completion of a formal education program, pharmacists demonstrated an increase in knowledge and comfort level with prescribing contraception. Intentional training opportunities should be provided to pharmacists prior to implementation. Other health-systems could benefit from offering a similar program.

支持药剂师与立法变化:药剂师的知识和舒适的避孕处方。
由于避孕药具的稀缺和其他变量,美国的意外怀孕率很高,健康人群2030的目标是通过增加避孕措施的使用来解决这一问题。2023年,印第安纳州通过了一项立法,允许药剂师开自行避孕的处方。使用药剂师开具的避孕处方受到限制,许多州没有利用这一机会促进生殖平等。我们的目的是解决文献中评估药剂师对该方案的实施和利用的舒适度和知识的重大差距。目的本研究的目的是评估药剂师在通过药剂师驱动的方案进行避孕护理的正规教育计划前后的舒适度和知识水平。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,在印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯的一个安全网学术医疗中心进行。在2023年11月和12月的两次培训课程中,进行了正式的教育计划和相关的药剂师调查。结果共纳入30份成对调查,有效率为63%。中位[IQR]综合评分(知识和舒适度)从调查前的38分[34,57分]增加到调查后的86分[81,91分](P < .001)。总体正确中位数[IQR]知识得分从40%[40,50]增加到70% [60,80](P < .001)。总体中位[IQR]舒适度评分从36%[27,68]上升至95% [86 100](P < .001)。结论在完成正规教育项目后,药剂师对处方避孕的知识和舒适度有所提高。实施前应向药师提供有意的培训机会。其他卫生系统也可以从提供类似的项目中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信