Refining Intra-Arterial Therapy Selection for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Deep Learning Approach Based on Covariate Interaction Analysis.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-07-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S532116
Chao An, Lei Li, Yang Luo, Mengxuan Zuo, Wendao Liu, Chengzhi Li, Peihong Wu
{"title":"Refining Intra-Arterial Therapy Selection for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Deep Learning Approach Based on Covariate Interaction Analysis.","authors":"Chao An, Lei Li, Yang Luo, Mengxuan Zuo, Wendao Liu, Chengzhi Li, Peihong Wu","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S532116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global health burden, with most patients presenting at advanced stages, limiting treatment options to intra-arterial therapy (IAT) such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). However, optimizing IAT selection for large HCC remains challenging due to tumor heterogeneity and varying patient responses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for guidance of decision-making between TACE and HAIC for unresectable HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multi-center study involving 900 patients with large HCC treated with IATs. The DEep Learning for Interaction and Covariate Analysis in Intra-arterial Therapy SElection (DELICAITE) model integrates deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) with covariate interaction analysis. The model was trained on dual-modal clinical and imaging data to predict treatment response and was validated using prospective and independent external validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DELICAITE model demonstrated superior discriminative ability and accuracy in predicting progressive disease (PD) in both internal and external test sets, with AUCs of 0.756, 0.664, and 0.701, respectively. Patients classified by the model into the \"Maintain\" group showed significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to the \"Alter\" group (11.3 months vs 8.1 months, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The model's performance was further supported by its ability to stratify patients into subgroups most likely to benefit from TACE or HAIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DELICAITE model provides a precise and innovative approach to refine IAT schemes for large HCC, offering clinicians a reliable tool to select the most suitable treatment option and potentially improve patient survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"1393-1405"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S532116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global health burden, with most patients presenting at advanced stages, limiting treatment options to intra-arterial therapy (IAT) such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). However, optimizing IAT selection for large HCC remains challenging due to tumor heterogeneity and varying patient responses.

Aim: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for guidance of decision-making between TACE and HAIC for unresectable HCC.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-center study involving 900 patients with large HCC treated with IATs. The DEep Learning for Interaction and Covariate Analysis in Intra-arterial Therapy SElection (DELICAITE) model integrates deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) with covariate interaction analysis. The model was trained on dual-modal clinical and imaging data to predict treatment response and was validated using prospective and independent external validation cohorts.

Results: The DELICAITE model demonstrated superior discriminative ability and accuracy in predicting progressive disease (PD) in both internal and external test sets, with AUCs of 0.756, 0.664, and 0.701, respectively. Patients classified by the model into the "Maintain" group showed significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to the "Alter" group (11.3 months vs 8.1 months, P < 0.001). The model's performance was further supported by its ability to stratify patients into subgroups most likely to benefit from TACE or HAIC.

Conclusion: The DELICAITE model provides a precise and innovative approach to refine IAT schemes for large HCC, offering clinicians a reliable tool to select the most suitable treatment option and potentially improve patient survival outcomes.

改进大肝细胞癌动脉内治疗选择:基于协变量相互作用分析的深度学习方法。
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)是全球主要的健康负担,大多数患者出现在晚期,限制了治疗选择动脉内治疗(IAT),如经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)和肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)。然而,由于肿瘤的异质性和不同的患者反应,优化IAT选择对于大型HCC仍然具有挑战性。目的:建立并验证一种深度学习(DL)模型,用于指导不可切除HCC的TACE和HAIC之间的决策。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性的多中心研究,涉及900例接受IATs治疗的大肝癌患者。在动脉内治疗选择中的相互作用和协变量分析的深度学习(DELICAITE)模型集成了深度卷积神经网络(DCNN)和协变量相互作用分析。该模型采用双模临床和影像数据进行训练,以预测治疗反应,并使用前瞻性和独立的外部验证队列进行验证。结果:DELICAITE模型在预测进行性疾病(PD)的内部和外部测试集上均表现出较好的判别能力和准确性,auc分别为0.756、0.664和0.701。根据模型划分为“维持”组的患者的总生存期(OS)明显长于“改变”组(11.3个月vs 8.1个月,P < 0.001)。该模型的性能进一步得到了其将患者分为最有可能从TACE或HAIC获益的亚组的能力的支持。结论:DELICAITE模型提供了一种精确和创新的方法来完善大型HCC的IAT方案,为临床医生选择最合适的治疗方案提供了可靠的工具,并有可能改善患者的生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信