Intrapatient Variation in Response to Systemic Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1200/PO-25-00015
Philip J Johnson, Ellen L Boswell
{"title":"Intrapatient Variation in Response to Systemic Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Philip J Johnson, Ellen L Boswell","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Progression-free survival (PFS) has been proposed as a surrogate end point in clinical trials for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). However, there have been concerns about the discrepancy between PFS and overall survival. Here, we aimed to characterize the behavior of individual lesions within the same patient/liver that play a key role in response assessment to a systemic treatment and how this changed temporally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained serial lesion measurement data from six clinical trials undertaken in the modern era (by which we mean since the first controlled trial in aHCC). In each patient, the percentage change of their lesion size was calculated at each visit compared with the baseline/screening phase. To assess lesion behavior, the patients were classified according to the degree of divergence (DOD) categories that ranged from 0 (all lesions behaved similarly) to 2 (completely discordant behavior). Finally, the results were summarized per treatment arm as the proportion of patients in each divergence category per follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 8,260 visits where DOD was assessed in patients, there was a considerable proportion of patients with divergent lesion behavior at the treatment arm level-approximately 58% were DOD 0, 38% were DOD 1, and 4% were DOD 2. Individually, there was evidence of lesions both increasing and decreasing in size within the same liver despite the treatment remaining the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence presented here suggests that caution should be exercised in the application of progression-based metrics such as PFS as an end point in HCC clinical trials. Ultimately, there was consistently a considerable proportion of patients who were classified as having lesions within their liver which had a divergent response to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500015"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Progression-free survival (PFS) has been proposed as a surrogate end point in clinical trials for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). However, there have been concerns about the discrepancy between PFS and overall survival. Here, we aimed to characterize the behavior of individual lesions within the same patient/liver that play a key role in response assessment to a systemic treatment and how this changed temporally.

Methods: We obtained serial lesion measurement data from six clinical trials undertaken in the modern era (by which we mean since the first controlled trial in aHCC). In each patient, the percentage change of their lesion size was calculated at each visit compared with the baseline/screening phase. To assess lesion behavior, the patients were classified according to the degree of divergence (DOD) categories that ranged from 0 (all lesions behaved similarly) to 2 (completely discordant behavior). Finally, the results were summarized per treatment arm as the proportion of patients in each divergence category per follow-up visit.

Results: Of the 8,260 visits where DOD was assessed in patients, there was a considerable proportion of patients with divergent lesion behavior at the treatment arm level-approximately 58% were DOD 0, 38% were DOD 1, and 4% were DOD 2. Individually, there was evidence of lesions both increasing and decreasing in size within the same liver despite the treatment remaining the same.

Conclusion: The evidence presented here suggests that caution should be exercised in the application of progression-based metrics such as PFS as an end point in HCC clinical trials. Ultimately, there was consistently a considerable proportion of patients who were classified as having lesions within their liver which had a divergent response to treatment.

晚期肝细胞癌患者对全身治疗反应的内部差异。
目的:无进展生存期(PFS)已被提议作为晚期肝细胞癌(aHCC)临床试验的替代终点。然而,PFS和总生存期之间的差异令人担忧。在这里,我们的目的是描述同一患者/肝脏内单个病变的行为,这些病变在对全身治疗的反应评估中起关键作用,以及这种情况如何在时间上发生变化。方法:我们从现代(我们指的是自aHCC的第一个对照试验以来)进行的六项临床试验中获得了一系列病变测量数据。在每个患者中,与基线/筛查阶段相比,计算每次就诊时病变大小的百分比变化。为了评估病变行为,根据差异程度(DOD)类别对患者进行分类,范围从0(所有病变行为相似)到2(完全不一致行为)。最后,将每个治疗组的结果总结为每次随访中每个差异类别的患者比例。结果:在对患者进行DOD评估的8,260次就诊中,有相当比例的患者在治疗组水平上具有不同的病变行为-约58%为DOD 0, 38%为DOD 1, 4%为DOD 2。个别而言,有证据表明,尽管治疗方法保持不变,但在同一肝脏内,病变的大小既增加又减少。结论:本文提供的证据表明,在HCC临床试验中应用基于进展的指标(如PFS)作为终点时应谨慎。最终,有相当大比例的患者被归类为肝脏病变,对治疗有不同的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信