Willingness to pay for assisted reproductive technologies among individuals with infertility in China.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chaofan Li, Hongbin Cong, Stephen Jan, Lei Si, Ling Geng, Shunping Li
{"title":"Willingness to pay for assisted reproductive technologies among individuals with infertility in China.","authors":"Chaofan Li, Hongbin Cong, Stephen Jan, Lei Si, Ling Geng, Shunping Li","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infertility, a widely prevalent condition globally, incurs high economic burdens. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are effective treatments, but public health financing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rarely covers ART services. In China, where birth rates are declining, willingness to pay (WTP) can inform insurance reimbursement policies by reducing out-of-pocket expenses. However, there is no consensus on WTP thresholds for assessing the cost-effectiveness of fertility treatments in LMICs. This study aimed to assess WTP for ART among individuals with infertility in China. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey conducted at five hospitals across different geographical and socioeconomic regions in China. Individuals with infertility were recruited using a quota sampling method. A contingent valuation method was employed, with three hypothetical WTP scenarios developed to present detailed information on the success rates, costs, and the treatment processes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF), artificial insemination (AI), and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). A total of 570 individuals with infertility participated in the survey (94.4% female; mean [SD] age: 33.0 [4.7] years). The sampled respondents were willing to pay RMB 30,163 ($4259, 95% CI: RMB 29,650-30,675) for IVF, RMB 6046 ($854, 95% CI: RMB 5987-6106) for AI, and RMB 47,234 ($6669, 95% CI: RMB 46,435-48,033) for PGT. These WTPs were equivalent to 0.34, 0.07, and 0.53 times the GDP per capita in China, respectively. Older age and male-factor or unexplained infertility were significantly associated with lower WTP (P<0.05), while higher education and patient-physician communication about costs were positively associated with WTP (P<0.05). These findings suggest that public health insurance schemes should establish appropriate cost-effectiveness thresholds and reimbursement ceilings for ART to improve affordability and access. Incorporating patient-physician communication about cost into clinical practice may facilitate shared decision-making and potentially increase patients' perceived value of ART.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infertility, a widely prevalent condition globally, incurs high economic burdens. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are effective treatments, but public health financing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rarely covers ART services. In China, where birth rates are declining, willingness to pay (WTP) can inform insurance reimbursement policies by reducing out-of-pocket expenses. However, there is no consensus on WTP thresholds for assessing the cost-effectiveness of fertility treatments in LMICs. This study aimed to assess WTP for ART among individuals with infertility in China. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey conducted at five hospitals across different geographical and socioeconomic regions in China. Individuals with infertility were recruited using a quota sampling method. A contingent valuation method was employed, with three hypothetical WTP scenarios developed to present detailed information on the success rates, costs, and the treatment processes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF), artificial insemination (AI), and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). A total of 570 individuals with infertility participated in the survey (94.4% female; mean [SD] age: 33.0 [4.7] years). The sampled respondents were willing to pay RMB 30,163 ($4259, 95% CI: RMB 29,650-30,675) for IVF, RMB 6046 ($854, 95% CI: RMB 5987-6106) for AI, and RMB 47,234 ($6669, 95% CI: RMB 46,435-48,033) for PGT. These WTPs were equivalent to 0.34, 0.07, and 0.53 times the GDP per capita in China, respectively. Older age and male-factor or unexplained infertility were significantly associated with lower WTP (P<0.05), while higher education and patient-physician communication about costs were positively associated with WTP (P<0.05). These findings suggest that public health insurance schemes should establish appropriate cost-effectiveness thresholds and reimbursement ceilings for ART to improve affordability and access. Incorporating patient-physician communication about cost into clinical practice may facilitate shared decision-making and potentially increase patients' perceived value of ART.

中国不孕症患者支付辅助生殖技术的意愿。
不孕症是全球普遍存在的一种疾病,造成了很高的经济负担。辅助生殖技术是有效的治疗方法,但低收入和中等收入国家的公共卫生资金很少涵盖辅助生殖技术服务。在中国,出生率正在下降,支付意愿(WTP)可以通过减少自付费用来为保险报销政策提供信息。然而,对于用于评估中低收入国家生育治疗成本效益的WTP阈值尚无共识。本研究旨在评估中国不孕不育患者抗逆转录病毒治疗的WTP。数据来自在中国不同地理和社会经济区域的五家医院进行的横断面调查。使用配额抽样方法招募不孕症患者。采用条件评估方法,开发了三种假设的WTP情景,以提供有关体外受精(IVF)、人工授精(AI)和植入前基因检测(PGT)的成功率、成本和治疗过程的详细信息。共有570名不孕症患者参与了调查(94.4%为女性;平均[SD]年龄:33.0[4.7]岁)。抽样调查对象愿意为试管婴儿支付30163元人民币(4259美元,95% CI: 29,650-30,675元人民币),为人工智能支付6046元人民币(8554美元,95% CI: 5987-6106元人民币),为PGT支付47,234元人民币(6669美元,95% CI: 46,435-48,033元人民币)。这些WTPs分别相当于中国人均GDP的0.34倍、0.07倍和0.53倍。年龄较大、男性因素或不明原因的不孕症与较低的WTP (P)显著相关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信