Digitalization of Access to Primary Care: Is There an Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off?

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1002/hec.70014
Daniela Rodrigues, Noemi Kreif, Ara Darzi, Mauricio Barahona, Erik Mayer
{"title":"Digitalization of Access to Primary Care: Is There an Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off?","authors":"Daniela Rodrigues,&nbsp;Noemi Kreif,&nbsp;Ara Darzi,&nbsp;Mauricio Barahona,&nbsp;Erik Mayer","doi":"10.1002/hec.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the English National Health Service, most patients can use an online platform to send a written request to the practice, in addition to calling or visiting the practice in person. However, there are concerns that the availability of an online access route to primary care can adversely impact healthcare provision for older or lower socioeconomic groups. To examine those concerns, we explore the differential timing of online platforms' implementation between 2019 and 2020 across 289 practices covering over 2.5 million patients in North West London. We find no evidence of an impact of the online access route on age and socioeconomic-related inequity in synchronous interactions in primary care, but observe an increase in all interactions in this setting and in some cases, a small reduction (worst case, no changes) in unplanned hospital care. These findings suggest that having an online access route to primary care can improve the provision of healthcare services, at no detriment to patients from older and lower socioeconomic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 10","pages":"1943-1962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the English National Health Service, most patients can use an online platform to send a written request to the practice, in addition to calling or visiting the practice in person. However, there are concerns that the availability of an online access route to primary care can adversely impact healthcare provision for older or lower socioeconomic groups. To examine those concerns, we explore the differential timing of online platforms' implementation between 2019 and 2020 across 289 practices covering over 2.5 million patients in North West London. We find no evidence of an impact of the online access route on age and socioeconomic-related inequity in synchronous interactions in primary care, but observe an increase in all interactions in this setting and in some cases, a small reduction (worst case, no changes) in unplanned hospital care. These findings suggest that having an online access route to primary care can improve the provision of healthcare services, at no detriment to patients from older and lower socioeconomic groups.

Abstract Image

初级保健的数字化:是否存在公平-效率的权衡?
在英国国民健康服务体系中,除了打电话或亲自前往诊所外,大多数患者还可以使用在线平台向诊所发送书面请求。然而,有人担心,初级保健的在线访问途径的可用性可能对老年人或社会经济地位较低群体的医疗保健提供产生不利影响。为了研究这些问题,我们探讨了2019年至2020年期间在线平台在伦敦西北部覆盖250多万患者的289种实践中的实施时间差异。我们没有发现在线访问途径对初级保健同步互动中年龄和社会经济相关不平等的影响的证据,但观察到在这种情况下所有互动都有所增加,在某些情况下,计划外的医院护理略有减少(最坏的情况下,没有变化)。这些发现表明,通过在线途径获得初级保健可以改善医疗保健服务的提供,而不会损害老年人和社会经济地位较低群体的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信