Rationale and design of the rheumatoid arthritis non-responders to treatment (RANT) study: Use of a bioinformatics platform and “decentralized” clinical recruitment design
Gregory C. McDermott , Mary Jeffway , Thany Seyok , Harrison Zhang , Elena Myasoedova , John M. Davis III , Jon Giles , Jonathan Coblyn , Simon Helfgott , Elena Massarotti , Robert Sands , Michael E. Weinblatt , Tracy Johansson , Gabriela Schmajuk , Kaleb Michaud , Cassandra Perry , Susanne Churchill , Katherine P. Liao
{"title":"Rationale and design of the rheumatoid arthritis non-responders to treatment (RANT) study: Use of a bioinformatics platform and “decentralized” clinical recruitment design","authors":"Gregory C. McDermott , Mary Jeffway , Thany Seyok , Harrison Zhang , Elena Myasoedova , John M. Davis III , Jon Giles , Jonathan Coblyn , Simon Helfgott , Elena Massarotti , Robert Sands , Michael E. Weinblatt , Tracy Johansson , Gabriela Schmajuk , Kaleb Michaud , Cassandra Perry , Susanne Churchill , Katherine P. Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.108000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Rheumatoid Arthritis Non-responders to Treatment (RANT) study (<span><span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05447182</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) uses a novel bioinformatics platform to facilitate a “decentralized” patient oriented clinical study. The goal is to identify genetic factors associated with inadequate response to biologic and targeted synthetic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) medications. The study was advertised through social media, research website postings, and targeted recruitment of potentially eligible patients in academic practices and existing RA research registries. Interested RA patients who failed two or more biologic or targeted synthetic RA therapies completed a self-directed online informed consent and questionnaires on RA treatment history and granted access to electronic health records through a third-party vendor. After confirming eligibility by reviewing participant responses, participants received a blood sample kit by mail, had blood sample tubes drawn locally, and returned the kit by mail to the study genomic lab for whole genome sequencing. The study enrolled 164 eligible patients. The majority of eligible participants were identified through an established RA research registry (<em>n</em> = 101, 61.6 %) and through clinic recruitment at academic practices (<em>n</em> = 47, 28.7 %). Of the participants who were mailed a blood kit, 118/130 (90.7 %) returned the kit with blood sample by mail. Clinical and genetic factors of RA treatment non-responders will be compared to RA treatment responders from established research cohorts. This study demonstrates the feasibility of decentralized patient-oriented clinical studies in medicine, and highlights the importance of “traditional” recruitment methods like patient registries and academic practices. Future study results will identify potential clinical and genetic predictors of treatment refractory RA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 108000"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425001946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Rheumatoid Arthritis Non-responders to Treatment (RANT) study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05447182) uses a novel bioinformatics platform to facilitate a “decentralized” patient oriented clinical study. The goal is to identify genetic factors associated with inadequate response to biologic and targeted synthetic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) medications. The study was advertised through social media, research website postings, and targeted recruitment of potentially eligible patients in academic practices and existing RA research registries. Interested RA patients who failed two or more biologic or targeted synthetic RA therapies completed a self-directed online informed consent and questionnaires on RA treatment history and granted access to electronic health records through a third-party vendor. After confirming eligibility by reviewing participant responses, participants received a blood sample kit by mail, had blood sample tubes drawn locally, and returned the kit by mail to the study genomic lab for whole genome sequencing. The study enrolled 164 eligible patients. The majority of eligible participants were identified through an established RA research registry (n = 101, 61.6 %) and through clinic recruitment at academic practices (n = 47, 28.7 %). Of the participants who were mailed a blood kit, 118/130 (90.7 %) returned the kit with blood sample by mail. Clinical and genetic factors of RA treatment non-responders will be compared to RA treatment responders from established research cohorts. This study demonstrates the feasibility of decentralized patient-oriented clinical studies in medicine, and highlights the importance of “traditional” recruitment methods like patient registries and academic practices. Future study results will identify potential clinical and genetic predictors of treatment refractory RA.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.