Enhancing military airway suction devices with a focus on performance and portability.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Maria J Londono, Saketh R Peri, Rakib Hasan, Connor J Evans, David Restrepo, Robert A De Lorenzo, R Lyle Hood
{"title":"Enhancing military airway suction devices with a focus on performance and portability.","authors":"Maria J Londono, Saketh R Peri, Rakib Hasan, Connor J Evans, David Restrepo, Robert A De Lorenzo, R Lyle Hood","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01262-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airway management is critical in combat casualty care, with airway compromise being the second leading cause of preventable battlefield deaths. Suction devices are essential for clearing obstructions during airway management; however, many medics choose not to carry them due to their excessive weight. Current standards for suction devices mention a minimum liquid flow rate of 1.2 L/min and a maximum device weight of 6 kg, but these standards fail to meet the practical needs of military end-users. The team conducted an I-Corps funded end-user assessment study with over 100 participants, in which a minimum flow rate of 1 L/min and a maximum weight of 4.5 kg were indicated as preferred among respondents. This gap between the standards and user preferences results in exclusion of existing devices from military kits due to weight concerns despite meeting performance criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this gap, the Suction Combat Ready Advanced Multifunctional Machine (SCRAMM) was developed with input from U.S. Military clinical stakeholders to emphasize both performance and portability. SCRAMM is designed to handle diverse medical scenarios simultaneously and was characterized against the market leaders Zoll 330 and Impact 326M. Liquid flow rates and device weights were measured and analyzed according to ISO standards and end-user requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zoll 330 and Impact 326M exceeded the ISO-required liquid flow rate by 145%, with weights of 4.8 kg and 5.1 kg, respectively. Additionally, both devices were heavier than the user-preferred weight limit of 4.5 kg. SCRAMM, with three suction lines for simultaneous diverse medical tasks, exceeded the ISO flow rate by 23%. It remained within the preferred weight range at 3.4 kg, demonstrating greater performance-to-weight balance in consideration of actual user needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the successful development and characterization of SCRAMM. It met ISO flow rate standards and remained under the 4.5 kg weight threshold preferred by end-users-outperforming current market leaders in portability while maintaining effective suction. These results highlight the importance of incorporating a performance-to-weight metric in evaluating portable suction devices. We recommend that future standards balance performance with portability to better suit military and emergency medical needs.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01262-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Airway management is critical in combat casualty care, with airway compromise being the second leading cause of preventable battlefield deaths. Suction devices are essential for clearing obstructions during airway management; however, many medics choose not to carry them due to their excessive weight. Current standards for suction devices mention a minimum liquid flow rate of 1.2 L/min and a maximum device weight of 6 kg, but these standards fail to meet the practical needs of military end-users. The team conducted an I-Corps funded end-user assessment study with over 100 participants, in which a minimum flow rate of 1 L/min and a maximum weight of 4.5 kg were indicated as preferred among respondents. This gap between the standards and user preferences results in exclusion of existing devices from military kits due to weight concerns despite meeting performance criteria.

Methods: To address this gap, the Suction Combat Ready Advanced Multifunctional Machine (SCRAMM) was developed with input from U.S. Military clinical stakeholders to emphasize both performance and portability. SCRAMM is designed to handle diverse medical scenarios simultaneously and was characterized against the market leaders Zoll 330 and Impact 326M. Liquid flow rates and device weights were measured and analyzed according to ISO standards and end-user requirements.

Results: Zoll 330 and Impact 326M exceeded the ISO-required liquid flow rate by 145%, with weights of 4.8 kg and 5.1 kg, respectively. Additionally, both devices were heavier than the user-preferred weight limit of 4.5 kg. SCRAMM, with three suction lines for simultaneous diverse medical tasks, exceeded the ISO flow rate by 23%. It remained within the preferred weight range at 3.4 kg, demonstrating greater performance-to-weight balance in consideration of actual user needs.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the successful development and characterization of SCRAMM. It met ISO flow rate standards and remained under the 4.5 kg weight threshold preferred by end-users-outperforming current market leaders in portability while maintaining effective suction. These results highlight the importance of incorporating a performance-to-weight metric in evaluating portable suction devices. We recommend that future standards balance performance with portability to better suit military and emergency medical needs.

Clinical trial number: not applicable.

提高军用气道吸入装置的性能和便携性。
背景:气道管理在战斗伤亡护理中至关重要,气道损伤是可预防的战场死亡的第二大原因。在气道管理过程中,吸入装置对于清除阻塞至关重要;然而,由于它们的重量过重,许多医生选择不携带它们。目前的抽吸装置标准要求最小液体流量为1.2 L/min,最大设备重量为6kg,但这些标准不能满足军事终端用户的实际需求。该团队进行了一项由I-Corps资助的最终用户评估研究,参与者超过100人,其中最小流量为1 L/min,最大重量为4.5 kg,受访者表示首选。标准和用户偏好之间的差距导致现有设备由于重量问题而被排除在军用套件之外,尽管满足性能标准。方法:为了解决这一差距,根据美国军方临床利益相关者的意见,开发了吸气战斗准备先进多功能机器(冲压机床),以强调性能和便携性。超燃冲压设计用于同时处理各种医疗场景,其特点是针对市场领导者Zoll 330和Impact 326M。根据ISO标准和最终用户要求测量和分析液体流速和设备重量。结果:Zoll 330和Impact 326M超过iso要求的液体流速145%,重量分别为4.8 kg和5.1 kg。此外,这两款设备的重量都超过了用户首选的4.5公斤的重量限制。同时具有多种医疗任务的三条吸入线的超燃冲压比ISO流量高出23%。它保持在3.4 kg的首选重量范围内,在考虑到实际用户需求时显示出更好的性能-重量平衡。结论:本研究证明了超燃冲压材料的成功开发和表征。它符合ISO流量标准,并保持在最终用户首选的4.5 kg重量阈值以下,在便携性方面优于当前市场领先者,同时保持了有效的吸力。这些结果强调了在评估便携式吸引装置时纳入性能重量度量的重要性。我们建议未来的标准在性能和便携性之间取得平衡,以更好地满足军事和紧急医疗需求。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信