Approach and Management of Multiple Victims of Civilian Bombing Events With Abdominopelvic Injuries: A 20-Year Institutional Experience in Pakistan.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Muhammad Nadeem Ahmad, Zahra Fatima Rahmatullah, Muhammad Masood Alam, Fatima Bhojani, Mallick Muhammad Zohaib Uddin, Shahzeb Ali, Naila Nadeem, Muhammad Salman Khan, Uffan Zafar
{"title":"Approach and Management of Multiple Victims of Civilian Bombing Events With Abdominopelvic Injuries: A 20-Year Institutional Experience in Pakistan.","authors":"Muhammad Nadeem Ahmad, Zahra Fatima Rahmatullah, Muhammad Masood Alam, Fatima Bhojani, Mallick Muhammad Zohaib Uddin, Shahzeb Ali, Naila Nadeem, Muhammad Salman Khan, Uffan Zafar","doi":"10.1177/00031348251358443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeBomb blast injuries in non-combat settings have seen a surge in the last two to three decades. Third-world countries like Pakistan have been at the receiving end of these attacks. However, the extent of the damage inflicted in these regions is not fully understood due to gross underreporting. We aim to assist radiologists in identifying common abdominopelvic injuries in bomb blast victims and highlighting specific injury patterns to guide more effective management.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study designed to analyze abdominopelvic injuries among bomb blast victims treated at our institution. Data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic health records and included demographic information (age and sex), injury classification, imaging results, treatment received, and clinical outcomes.ResultsChi-square and t-tests showed no statistically significant difference in the gender or mean age distribution between patients who underwent abdominopelvic surgery and those who did not. The most common single injury category among the patients analyzed was secondary injury, while the most common combination of injuries observed was a combination of secondary and tertiary injuries. CT was the most frequently requested first-line radiological investigation, while US was most frequently requested as a second-line modality. Injuries to the liver were the most frequently observed solid-organ injury.ConclusionEfficient practices are essential in radiology departments to manage the surge in patient numbers seen after bomb blast incidents. Our study emphasizes the role of radiology scans and details the types of abdominopelvic injury patterns observed in bomb blast victims.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251358443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251358443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeBomb blast injuries in non-combat settings have seen a surge in the last two to three decades. Third-world countries like Pakistan have been at the receiving end of these attacks. However, the extent of the damage inflicted in these regions is not fully understood due to gross underreporting. We aim to assist radiologists in identifying common abdominopelvic injuries in bomb blast victims and highlighting specific injury patterns to guide more effective management.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study designed to analyze abdominopelvic injuries among bomb blast victims treated at our institution. Data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic health records and included demographic information (age and sex), injury classification, imaging results, treatment received, and clinical outcomes.ResultsChi-square and t-tests showed no statistically significant difference in the gender or mean age distribution between patients who underwent abdominopelvic surgery and those who did not. The most common single injury category among the patients analyzed was secondary injury, while the most common combination of injuries observed was a combination of secondary and tertiary injuries. CT was the most frequently requested first-line radiological investigation, while US was most frequently requested as a second-line modality. Injuries to the liver were the most frequently observed solid-organ injury.ConclusionEfficient practices are essential in radiology departments to manage the surge in patient numbers seen after bomb blast incidents. Our study emphasizes the role of radiology scans and details the types of abdominopelvic injury patterns observed in bomb blast victims.

处理和管理多名平民爆炸事件受害者的腹部和骨盆损伤:巴基斯坦20年的机构经验。
在过去的二三十年里,非战斗环境中的炸弹爆炸伤害激增。巴基斯坦等第三世界国家一直是这些袭击的受害国。然而,由于严重漏报,这些地区遭受的破坏程度尚不完全清楚。我们的目标是协助放射科医生识别炸弹爆炸受害者常见的腹部骨盆损伤,并突出具体的损伤模式,以指导更有效的治疗。方法回顾性观察分析我院收治的炸弹爆炸患者的骨盆损伤情况。数据从医院的电子健康记录中检索,包括人口统计信息(年龄和性别)、损伤分类、成像结果、接受的治疗和临床结果。结果经χ 2检验和t检验,两组患者的性别和平均年龄分布差异无统计学意义。在分析的患者中,最常见的单一损伤类别是继发性损伤,而观察到的最常见的损伤组合是继发性和三期损伤的组合。CT是最常要求的一线放射检查,而US是最常要求的二线方式。肝脏损伤是最常见的实体器官损伤。结论在处理炸弹爆炸事故后激增的病人时,放射科必须采取有效的措施。我们的研究强调了放射学扫描的作用,并详细介绍了在炸弹爆炸受害者中观察到的腹部骨盆损伤类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信